Moreover, it can be difficult to talk “choice” when a woman is coerced into having an abortion by a husband, boyfriend, parent, or even a grandparent. When, as research indicates, as many as 60% of abortions are coerced, the so-called “choice” is often made by someone other than the mother of the child.
Still, what finally made me abandon the term “pro-choice” was the recognition that anyone who laid claim to the term was campaigning to shore up the abortion industry—to continue the tragedy known as abortion on demand. Pro-choicers were making a conscious decision to see that the abortion trade continues, in spite of the fact that abortion takes one innocent life and leaves a mother to grieve the loss of an irreplaceable child.
It is fascinating to note that many abortion advocates themselves are abandoning the “pro-choice” terminology and instead embracing phrases such as “reproductive justice” or “repro rights.” In a real sense these new monikers are even more deceptive than “pro-choice.” But, no matter what you call it, the result is the same—more than 62 million preborn children’s lives tragically ended. (Read more.)
The Last Judgment
19 hours ago
1 comment:
I notice they avoid the word Abortion. The evil in the word is too much even for them to swallow. They believe that by changing the terminology that will make it acceptable. They can manipulate the language, but that doesn't change the biological fact anymore than their use of language in an effort to deny the biological fact of gender.
Post a Comment