My Lagan Love

Where Lagan stream sings lullaby 
There blows a lily fair 
The twilight gleam is in her eye 
The night is on her hair 
And like a love-sick leánan sídhe
She has my heart in thrall 
Nor life I own nor liberty 
For love is lord of all.  

Her father sails a running-barge 
'Twixt Leamh-beag and The Druim; 
And on the lonely river-marge 
She clears his hearth for him. 
When she was only fairy-high 
Her gentle mother died; 
But dew-Love keeps her memory 
Green on the Lagan side.  

And often when the beetle's horn 
Hath lulled the eve to sleep 
I steal unto her shieling lorn 
And thru the dooring peep. 
There on the cricket's singing stone, 
She spares the bogwood fire, 
And hums in sad sweet undertone 
The songs of heart's desire  

Her welcome, like her love for me, 
Is from her heart within: 
Her warm kiss is felicity 
That knows no taint of sin.
And, when I stir my foot to go, 
'Tis leaving Love and light
To feel the wind of longing blow 
From out the dark of night.  

Where Lagan stream sings lullaby 
There blows a lily fair 
The twilight gleam is in her eye 
The night is on her hair 
And like a love-sick leánan sídhe
She has my heart in thrall 
Nor life I owe nor liberty 
For love is lord of all. 

(from an old Irish song)
A beautiful rendition, HERE, HERE and HERE.

To quote from Mary O'Hara's notes on this song, from her book A Song For Ireland:

The leánan sídhe (fairy mistress) mentioned in the song is a malicious figure who frequently crops up in Gaelic love stories. One could call her the femme fatale of Gaelic folklore. She sought the love of men; if they refused, she became their slave, but if they consented, they became her slaves and could only escape by finding another to take their place. She fed off them so her lovers gradually wasted away - a common enough theme in Gaelic medieval poetry, which often saw love as a kind of sickness. Most Gaelic poets in the past had their leanán sídhe to give them inspiration. This malignant fairy was for them a sort of Gaelic muse. On the other hand, the crickets mentioned in the song are a sign of good luck and their sound on the hearth a good omen. It was the custom of newly-married couples about to set up home to bring crickets from the hearths of their parents' house....

(Artwork)

Share

Eating the Elephant One Bite at a Time

 From Tierney's Real News:

Trump has always been honest about what he values: battlefield presence, TV “central casting” presence, and the ability to sell his strategies to the public and keep the base fired up.

Pam Bondi did her job — she empaneled grand juries, put boots on the ground in Florida, and set the stage for the prosecutions Trump wanted to see. Ultimately, her track record in cases is the best the DOJ has seen in 50 years. But she never really learned how to play the media board. She is better in a courtroom than on TV.

Bondi is good at the mechanics of the job. She lined up cases. She did her best to put the right prosecutors in place. She cleared the way for the kind of RICO‑style grand conspiracy work now targeting figures like John Brennan. In that sense, she was the perfect rook: you move her straight into the right squares and then let someone else handle the finishing moves.

Trump loved Pam Bondi enough to put her in the Attorney General’s chair, but he also found out she’s not built for the TV war — so he’s moved her to the private sector, where she can amplify his message like Dan Bongino is doing right now - rather than slow‑walk it from inside the DOJ. Remember, President Trump said nobody knows how someone will perform until they are tested. Correct!

Now Tulsi Gabbard, Todd Blanche, Kash Patel, and Joe diGenova are lining up the pieces for what could be the biggest legal reckoning in the deep state’s history.

Trump still loves her, but he’s not blind. He knows that if you’re going to run the Justice Department in a hyper‑visible political war, you need someone who can show up on TV, talk directly to the camera, and keep the Fox‑News‑and‑talk‑radio‑aligned audience engaged. That’s not Bondi’s strength. That’s Blanche’s role now.

Her move to the private sector could be a lot more useful than harmful. She can go out and talk, write, build a media presence, and operate like Dan Bongino — not from inside the bureaucracy, but as an outside voice that amplifies what the administration is doing. That’s often more powerful than a hesitant, over‑cautious mouthpiece in a government chair. (Read more.)

Share

Romans, Not “Byzantines”

 From Medievalists:

Few historical civilizations suffer from a greater identity mismatch than the Byzantine Empire. To modern readers, “Byzantine” conjures images of decadence, intrigue, and a shadowy afterlife of ancient Rome. Yet to the people who lived in the empire we now call Byzantine, this label would have been meaningless. They did not call themselves Byzantines. They did not believe they lived in a successor state. They were Rhomaioi—Romans—and their empire was the Roman Empire.

Understanding how Byzantines saw themselves is more than a matter of semantics. It reshapes our understanding of medieval history, Roman continuity, and the profound cultural divide between Eastern and Western Europe. The Byzantine self-image as Roman endured for more than a thousand years, surviving language change, religious transformation, territorial loss, and even the fall of Rome itself. (Read more.)

Share

Mystery of a 17th-Century Portrait

 

 From ArtNet:

It is not known when the painting entered the collection of the Sidney family, which has lived at Penshurst Place since Tudor times. However, it was first recorded at the family home in 1743 and has been on public display since 1947.

The NPG’s senior curator for research, Charlotte Bolland, has described the painting as “an incredibly early” full-length depiction of a person of African heritage in England. She told ITV that portraits were typically reserved for elite subjects “who were interested in conveying messages about themselves.” She described the portrait as particularly “ambitious and unusual” in its presentation of two young boys side-by-side.

Conservators have lifted layers of discolored varnish from the canvas, allowing the work to “really come to life,” said Bolland.

A deeper investigation into the portrait has so far included both a technical analysis, including examining pigments and using radiography to look beneath the surface, and extensive archival research to try and find hints about who the two boys might be. Speaking to the BBC, Bolland described the work as “a real collaborative effort.” Dress historians, hunting historians, and genealogists are among the experts who will weigh in. (Read more.)

Share

Why America is at War with Iran

 From Culturcidal:

America’s entanglement with Iran really started when they elected a prime minister who soon thereafter nationalized their oil industry, which the British then controlled. We tried to mediate the issue between the countries, but we were closer allies with Britain and soon began to fear that Iran was going to drift toward the Soviet Union’s sphere of influence. During the Cold War, when the United States and the Soviets treated the whole planet like pieces on a chessboard, this drove a lot of our foreign policy decisions. In this case, it prompted us to partner with Britain and help the Shah of Iran, who was already part of the government, to take FULL CONTROL of the country.

The Shah was friendly to us. He also wanted to Westernize Iran and make it into a regional power. He had some success on this front. Economic conditions improved rapidly, he gave women the right to vote (although voting for everyone was limited), their military became stronger, and things were going in the right direction in Iran in many respects.

That being said, the Shah was a dictator and would still throw you in prison if you stood against him. This led to the Iranian Revolution in 1979.

Although many groups across Iran helped to get rid of the Shah, ultimately, the religious crazies led by the Ayatollah Khomeini ended up in charge. As it turned out, they were more oppressive than the Shah, more murderous, and the rapid improvement of Iran that happened under the Shah dramatically slowed down and even regressed in many ways. (Read more.)

Share

That Vulgar Necklace

 Marie-Antoinette was the victim of the entire debacle. From Country Life:

The story begins in 1772, when Louis XV commissioned an enormous diamond necklace for his maîtresse-en-titre, Madame du Barry. For 200,000,000 livres (about £12 million today), the royal jewellers Boehmer and Bassenge were to create a rivière consisting of 647 flawless, perfectly matched diamonds; a necklace so heavy that it would have to have diamond streamers down the back to prevent the wearer from toppling forward.

In 1774, Louis XV died. Undeterred, Boehmer and Bassenge completed the necklace and, in 1778, just after war had been declared on Britain, offered it to Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette. For whatever reason — Thomas Carlyle quotes the queen as saying ‘We have more need of seventy-fours [ships] than necklaces’ — she refused it.

For the next two years, Boehmer and Bassenge hawked the necklace around the royal courts of Europe without success. In 1781, following the birth of the dauphin, they again tried to sell it to Louis XVI — and again were rebuffed. This was the year in which Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy, an impoverished and unscrupulous young woman, began to insinuate herself into royal circles by pretending to be one of Marie Antoinette’s closest confidantes. In 1783, she achieved her greatest social success when she was taken up by Cardinal de Rohan — nearly twice her age, extremely wealthy and, frankly, not that bright.

De Rohan had lost all chance of preferment, having publicly insulted Marie Antoinette’s mother. He yearned to be accepted back at court and de Valois offered to carry a letter of apology to the Queen. The forged response de Valois brought back was, unsurprisingly, encouraging. Further forged letters convinced de Rohan that the Queen was in love with him and that he should give money to de Valois, which he did. Her problem now was that the cardinal kept pressing for a meeting with sa Majesté. How relieved de Valois must have been when she encountered a prostitute, Marie Nicole Leguay d’Oliva, who bore an uncanny resemblance to the Queen and was willing, for a fee, to take part in a practical joke. (Read more.)

Share

Childhood of Mary Stuart

From English Historical Fiction Writers: 

Although historians often cast the dismissal of her playmates in a harsh light, Poissy was only a few miles from Saint Germain.  The Four Maries often visited the palace on weekends and holidays. They had not been exiled to an austere convent in a backwater location. The convent school at Saint Louis Priory provided a high-quality liberal education to its aristocratic students. Even religious policies were flexible to a degree. Marie Livingston, whose family embraced the new learning, was encouraged but not forced to attend Mass. By the time the Four Maries reached puberty, they were well educated and highly polished French girls, ready to be integrated into the life at the French court.  Nevertheless, their place in the life of the Queen had been taken by the Princesses Elisabeth and Claude, and their brother Francois, the Dauphin.

By the time she was eleven, the Queen of Scots might well have been homesick for her mother, but there is no reason to think she missed or even remembered the land of which she was sovereign. (Read more.)

Share

The Deep State Diplomats Who Failed

 From Amuse on X:

On April 15, 2026, TIME published a piece by Philip Wang carrying the headline “It’s Not Working: Diplomats Fear Trump’s Iran Envoys Are Making Things Worse.” The article rests almost entirely on three named former officials, Aaron David Miller, David Satterfield, and Robert Einhorn, who are presented as sober experts watching amateurs fumble a delicate file. The framing is familiar. The evidentiary basis is weaker than the framing suggests. It is worth walking through what these three men actually did in government, what they did not do, and what the record shows about the men they are criticizing. Once that is done, a further question comes into view. It concerns whether the category “experienced diplomat” is doing the analytical work Wang assumes it is doing, and whether, in fact, the opposite proposition may be closer to the truth.

Begin with Miller. He spent 24 years at the State Department, from 1978 to 2003, advising six secretaries of state on Arab-Israeli negotiations. His principal file was the Syria-Israel track. That track produced no agreement during his tenure. The Camp David summit in July 2000, at which he was present, collapsed. Miller has been candid about this record. His own CNN biography describes him as having spent “a couple decades in and around failing Arab-Israeli negotiations,” and his 2008 book is titled “The Much Too Promised Land: America’s Elusive Search for Arab-Israeli Peace.” In a History News Network essay, he wrote that he knows “a thing or two about failure.” This is not a partisan characterization. It is his self-description. A reader is entitled to ask why a man who acknowledges having worked on failed negotiations for thirty years is positioned by TIME as the benchmark against which current envoys should be measured.

Consider next Satterfield. He is associated in the public mind with the Israel-Lebanon maritime border agreement, and he did work on an early framework for those talks between 2017 and 2019. But the agreement itself was signed on October 27, 2022, and it was brokered by Amos Hochstein, not by Satterfield. AIPAC credited Hochstein by name. Al Jazeera credited Hochstein by name. Satterfield was one of at least four American envoys who handled the file over a period of years, and he was not the one in the room when it closed. His more recent work is also worth noting. From October 2023 to May 2024, he served as President Biden’s Special Envoy for Middle East Humanitarian Issues. In December 2024, he told CBS News that Trump was “exaggerating” Turkey’s influence over Syrian rebel forces. Wang does not disclose the Biden role or the CBS appearance to his readers.(Read more.)

Share

The Last Aztec Princess

From The Collector:

 When the Spanish arrived in Tenochtitlan, the Aztec were ruled by Motecuhzoma Xocoyotzin, better and less accurately known as Moctezuma II, the powerful huey tlatoani who had expanded the empire to its greatest extent. Chroniclers marveled at his many wives, lesser wives and concubines, as well as his numerous children, with one claiming he had at least 100. History recorded just a few, however, including two sons who died during the conquest and one legitimate daughter, often called the last Aztec princess: Isabel.

Little is known for certain about Isabel’s life before the arrival of the Spanish colonizers. Her birth year, which of Moctezuma’s many wives was her mother, or even the correct translation of her Nahuatl name, are unknown. Some contemporary records and documents kept by the Spanish give her birth year as 1510, which would have made her just 9 years old at the time the conquest began in 1519, and when she first married. Others describe her as a maiden, suggesting she was not a child but a girl of marriageable age, while still others indicate she was born before Moctezuma became huey tlatoani, which occurred in 1503, making her a young adult when Hernán Cortés and his contingent of conquistadors arrived.

Contemporary accounts are equally unclear about her lineage, with some suggesting she was the daughter of Moctezuma’s first wife and others indicating she was born of one of his secondary wives. Marriages were often undertaken to cement alliances with neighboring groups, while marrying within family groups to preserve the noble or semi-divine bloodline was also common, ultimately making either wife an equally likely candidate for a child considered his heir. The ruler also had many concubines, though records do seem to agree that Isabel was not the result of any of those unions; some half-siblings who would later come to challenge her status as Moctezuma’s heir were. (Read more.)

Share

Versailles Restores Royal Bedroom to Its 1789 Splendor

 

Louis XIV was the great-grandfather of Louis XV, not his father. From ArtNet:

The 2,300-room Palace of Versailles just outside of Paris receives a seemingly constant stream of repairs. Just last year, for instance, an American-French coalition launched a restoration inside the state apartment of Sun King Louis XIV. Elsewhere, experts have been restoring one bedroom within the King’s Private Apartments, which Louis XV built and Louis XVI used, since the 1980s. Now, that project has finally come to an end. Crews just placed the very last details replicating precisely what this princely bedroom looked like on October 6, 1789—the very day that the French royal family made its final departure from Versailles.

[...]

 This particular bedroom was built in 1728. French architect Jacques V Gabriel and his son Ange-Jacques Gabriel, who both served France’s royal family, designed the space together. Antwerp-born sculptor, cabinetmaker, and ornamentalist Jacques Verberckt, meanwhile, provided structural decorations such as the space’s impossibly delicate Rocaille embellishments, just as he did for other parts of Versailles—like, the Queen’s Room in 1730. (Read more.)

Share

The Panicans were Wrong

 From Tierney's Real News:

Remember, oil was $120 a barrel under Biden and the DOW never got over 42,000. Now oil is down 35% from record highs under Obama and the DOW is up 20%!

So I’m saying this once and for all: the panicans and RINO doomers were wrong—again.

Six weeks ago, “the experts” swore that Trump’s showdown with Iran would crash the stock market, send oil over $200, and drag us into a permanent war. Instead, look at the results: oil is down around $80 per barrel, the Dow is back at record highs, the Strait of Hormuz is open and safe, and Iran has agreed not to build a nuclear weapon or keep enriched uranium. Not only that, but a ceasefire is holding in Lebanon, and Israel and Lebanon are headed to the White House for talks after 34 years of silence.

Trump didn’t run from the fight; he stared down the Iranian regime, the Axis of Resistance, and the doom‑porn media—and he won. The world is less dangerous, the markets are stronger, and the “forever‑war” narrative that his critics hyped has already collapsed. (Read more.)

Share

We Shall Not Fight on the Beaches

 From Claremont Review of Books:

In a sense, dystopian novels are both optimistic and conservative. They are optimistic in that they do not hold the future they describe to be inevitable and unavoidable. They are conservative in that they imagine a world very much worse than our own, and therefore are an encouragement to political virtues such as prudence and realism. They remind us that, short of extermination camps or other complete disasters, we always have something to lose as well as to gain and that progress often has a dark—even a very dark—side. Perfection is not of this world.

In 1973, Jean Raspail, who died aged 94 in 2020, published his dystopian novel The Camp of the Saints, for which he is now mostly remembered (certainly outside of France, though he was the author of many other well-considered novels and travelogues, and narrowly missed election to the Académie française). The Camp of the Saints is a book that refuses to lie down, so to speak, despite attempts to render it invisible or make it go away.

The plot is simple. A huge armada of rotting hulks, bearing a million impoverished and half-starved Bengalis desperate to reach Europe, which they suppose to be a land flowing with milk and honey, sets out from Calcutta and eventually reaches the south coast of France. The local population flees before this invasion, no official efforts having been made to repel it. French society collapses; the success of the armada spells the downfall of Europe, and the whole of the West, as a civilization. (Read more.)

Share

The Context of Henriette-Marie

 

An insightful assessment of My Queen, My Love from Laura Crockett at The History Desk:

Henriette Marie married Charles I of England in 1625. She became his queen but was never crowned, formally. When she married Charles, she was 15. Our modern perspective tells us that is a mere girl. Nevertheless, previous ages were practical in these matters. Henriette died when she was 59. That too, is young in our eyes.  Nonetheless, she lived to a ripe age, because the average, back in the day, was 35 years.

Vidal structures the story as one of those perfect circles, wherein she begins with Marie de Medici, Henriette’s mother, and then closes the story with Marie. What is given to us, in between the Marie sections, is the story of her daughter, who lived during a crucial development era in the history of the Western world.

Marie’s story is fascinating all on its own. Marie was an old maid of 25 before she was married. But what a marriage! Her guy was Henry IV, perhaps one of the smartest men to hold the French crown for centuries. His grandson was Louis XIV. But after that, for the French royal houses, it was all downhill. Marie was Henri’s second wife. Louis XIII, of Musketeer fame, was their first child. Henriette their last. When Henriette was still in infancy, her father was assassinated. That was an event that truly changed the trajectory of history. Henri would be considered a rather liberal thinker, in the traditional sense of the word; live, and let live. Indeed, the French coined the phrase, laissez faire; leave it alone. Wherein we get the phrase, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Henri gave us the Edict of Nance, which ended the religious wars in France. The essence of the Edict was toleration of the protestants, i.e., leave them alone. (Read more.)

Share

Trump’s Strategic Masterclass

 From Tierney's Real News:

Many people still think President Trump’s recent foreign policy moves are scattershot — a tariff here, a blockade there. But if you zoom out, and look past the bluster, the bigger picture becomes clear: there’s a method to it all, a global strategy to stop the BRICS nations, especially Communist China and Russia and Iran, from tightening their grip on the world’s oil, trade routes and resources.

Trump’s not reacting. He’s positioning. While the fake news still chases quick photo-ops and weak “summits,” Trump’s locking down key economic and military chokepoints that decide who really holds power in the modern world.

President Trump’s recent moves against Iran, Venezuela, and even Greenland aren’t random. They’re smart, calculated steps in a bigger plan to stop the Islamo-Communist BRICS nations - led by Communist China and Russia and backed by the UN - from controlling America and the world. (Read more.)

Share

Spain Gave the Death Penalty to the Victim, Not the Rapists

 From Celina's Substack:

This is how broken the West has become. On Thursday, March 26, 2026, in a clinically sterile room within an assisted living facility in Barcelona, Spain, the government executed a twenty five year old paralysed rape victim. Her name was Noelia Castillo Ramos.1 Noelia did not die of a terminal illness, nor did she pass away from natural causes. Rather, she was administered a lethal injection by the Spanish state that had dismantled her family, forced her into a hostile and horribly dangerous environment, ignored her horrific violation, and ultimately deemed her broken existence too inconvenient to maintain.2

While Noelia Castillo’s heart was stopped by a cocktail of state-sponsored chemicals, the unvetted migrant men who gang-raped her, shattered her mind, and drove her to fling herself from a fifth-floor window continue to walk the streets of Europe, entirely shielded from justice. They faced zero consequences. She faced the death penalty.

The fate of Noelia Castillo stands as a single almost perfect, undeniable illustration of everything that is broken, evil, and actively suicidal about modern Western society under progressive, woke, open-border, and secular-left governance. Progressive Europe has functionally and legally decided that native European women and girls are a disposable commodity, just collateral damage in the grand suicidal project of multiculturalism. (Read more.)

Share

Pope Leo XIII and the St. Michael Prayer

From Unveiling the Apocalypse:

I would like to recommend an excellent book by Kevin Symonds, titled Pope Leo XIII and the Prayer to St. Michael.  This recently published book, which examines the history behind the composition of the Prayer to St. Michael, presents a wealth of scholarly evidence which attests to the authenticity of the vision of Pope Leo XIII.  The author has obviously undertaken a painstaking amount of research for this book, and has translated several key documents which were previously unavailable in English.  A fresh batch of information is brought to light here, including additional material emanating from the eyewitness testimony provided by Fr. Pechenino, and a homily on Pope Leo's vision attributed to Cardinal Pedro Segura y Saenz. Among these new findings we find the surprising fact that the earliest accounts of this vision records that Satan had actually requested a period of 50-60 years in which to destroy the Church, rather than 75-100 years. 

While these documents which Symonds has unearthed are undoubtedly the earliest of their kind, and therefore possess the strongest claim to the full truth on this matter, we cannot fail to notice that this contradicts the common perception that Pope Leo's prophetic vision comprised the entirety of the 20th century, rather than just the first half of it.  On the surface, this discovery appears to indicate that the period of Satan's greater power ended around the middle of the 20th century, at the close of the Second World War. Once again, such a scenario appears to contradict the actual sequence of historical events, and it is plainly evident that the true grip of Satan's greater power only seemed to really take hold in the latter half of the 20th century, after the events of the Second World War, when the Sexual Revolution which took place in the 1960's coincided with a massive decline in the Church - paving the way for current apostasy we are still enduring today. (Read more.)

Share

Waiting Game

 From Tierney's Real News:

President Trump’s blockade in the Strait of Hormuz has shattered the Iranian regime’s long-held illusion that it could simply outwait American resolve. By choking off crude exports from Kharg Island, Trump’s pressure campaign has forced Iran into a storage crisis with just 13-16 days before tanks overflow.

The Iranian regime now finds itself in a corner. With nowhere to ship its oil, Iran faces a looming crisis: Kharg Island doesn’t have enough tanks to hold the crude being pumped from its fields. If the exports remain stalled, the regime will soon have no choice but to cut off oil extraction on the mainland entirely.

Trump’s blockade in the Strait of Hormuz, aimed squarely at Iran’s crude exports from Kharg Island, doesn’t just raise the stakes- it changes the game entirely. This is no longer about lost revenue or discounted barrels. It’s about physics. Oil has nowhere to go. And when oil can’t move, everything stops.

Iran’s export infrastructure depends heavily on Kharg Island. Oil from Iran’s fields is pumped to the island through undersea pipelines and then stored in tanks and then loaded on oil tankers - mostly headed to China. If oil tankers stop loading at the Island, crude begins to pile up. Once storage tanks on the Island fill - and by some estimates, that could happen in as little as two weeks - Iran must shut down oil extraction AND production all together! (Read more.)

Share

Galician Genes

 From EuroNews:

The official version reflected in the history books is that Columbus was born in Genoa, the seafarer of humble origins who convinced the Catholic Monarchs to finance what no one thought possible. This origin story has been questioned for decades by historians, linguists and, more recently, geneticists.

The latest chapter in this debate comes from a crypt in Gelves, a town in Seville where at least seven direct descendants of the explorer are buried. A team of researchers from the Citogen laboratory and the Complutense University of Madrid has published a preprint in 'bioRxiv' with the results of the third phase of a project that began with an exhumation in March 2022.

Its conclusions, not yet peer-reviewed, point to the Galician nobleman Pedro Álvarez de Sotomayor, known as Pedro Madruga, as the direct ancestor of the Columbian lineage.

It all started with a piece of information that did not add up. On analysing the DNA of 12 individuals exhumed from the family crypt of the Counts of Gelves, the researchers found that two of them shared genetic material without the historical documents justifying this relationship.

One was Jorge Alberto de Portugal, third Count of Gelves and great-great-grandson of Columbus. The other was María de Castro Girón de Portugal, a 17th century countess consort who had entered the family by marriage and whose lineage was Galician, she was the daughter of the 9th Count of Lemos.

That two people with no documented relationship share DNA can only be explained in one way: they have a common ancestor that the records do not show. The team applied a computational model on 16 generations of genealogies to identify that individual.

The analysis pointed, unequivocally according to the authors, to Pedro Álvarez de Sotomayor. To corroborate this, they resorted to the so-called Virtual Knock-out technique: when they virtually eliminated Pedro Madruga from the family tree, the genetic link between the two individuals disappeared. No other ancestor, among the hundreds analysed, was able to produce the same effect. (Read more.)

Share

The Fiery Sword of the Prophet Elias

  

From TFP:

In the words of Saint Bernard to Pope Eugene III, by vindicating the rights of God, Elias was the model of justice, mirror of holiness, example of piety, champion of truth, defender of the faith, doctor of Israel, teacher of the uneducated, refuge of the oppressed, advocate of the poor, an arm of widows, eye of the blind, the tongue of the dumb, avenger of crimes, dread of the wicked, glory of the righteous, rod of the mighty, hammer of tyrants, father of kings, salt of the earth, the light of the world, the prophet of the Most High, forerunner of Christ, the anointed of the Lord, terror of the Baalites and thunderbolt of idolaters.³

Elias fulfilled the threefold mission God had entrusted to him at Horeb. The time was approaching for him to leave the earth. For an ordinary person, this necessarily means passing through the threshold of death. However, divine Providence had other plans for Elias, the prophet of great exceptions. Some scholars believe the angels took him on a chariot of fire⁴ to an unknown place on earth; others, that he went to the earthly paradise. As he was taken up to heaven, he threw down his cloak to Elisha, his disciple and successor.

Thus, from his place, “consumed with zeal for the Lord God of hosts,” the prophet Elias follows the unfolding history of salvation.⁵ He contemplates the extreme decadence of modern times, when the laws of the Lord God are trampled upon like never before. He despises the idols which twenty-first century men have erected to Moloch, the God associated with child sacrifice, through the unspeakable sin of abortion; or to idols of sensuality with the increasing number of sexual immoralities added and accepted by society at large; finally, he can scarcely hold back his fiery sword when he witnesses the corruption and betrayal of members of the One True Church of Christ.

We pray to Saint Elias for the grace of perseverance and fidelity to the Lord of Hosts in these challenging times and we join our supplications to Ecclesiasticus . . .

“And who can glory like to thee? Who raisedst up a dead man from below, from the lot of death, by the word of the Lord God. Who broughtest down kings to destruction, and brokest easily their power in pieces, and the glorious from their bed. Who heardest judgment in Sina, and in Horeb the judgments of vengeance. Who anointedst kings to penance, and madest prophets successors after thee. Who wast taken up in a whirlwind of fire, in a chariot of fiery horses. Who art registered in the judgments of times to appease the wrath of the Lord, to reconcile the heart of the father to the son, and to restore the tribes of Jacob. Blessed are they that saw thee, and were honoured with thy friendship” (Ecclus. 48:4—11). (Read more.)

Share

Iran Won the Media War, Then Lost the Only War That Matters

 From Alexander Muse at Amuse on X:

For a few glorious weeks in the spring of 2026, the foreign policy establishment believed it had witnessed the impossible. Iran, a nation whose air defenses had been systematically dismantled, whose navy had been reduced to wreckage on the floor of the Persian Gulf, whose supreme leader had been killed by an American strike, had somehow emerged from 38 days of devastating combat as the victor. That, at least, was the story the drive-by media told. European leaders repeated it with undisguised satisfaction. Democrats echoed it with barely concealed glee. Iran had closed the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most critical energy chokepoint, and was now charging tolls on the tankers that dared to pass. The regime that had just absorbed more than 13,000 precision strikes was now, according to this narrative advanced by renown national security experts like UChicago Professor Robert Pape, the gatekeeper of global commerce. Checkmate. Game over.

Except none of it was true. Not the tolls, not the control, and certainly not the checkmate. What happened next revealed not Iranian strength but the strategic patience of an American president who understood something his critics either could not see or refused to admit: Iran did not control the Strait of Hormuz. It never had. And President Trump, having waited calmly while the world congratulated a broken regime on a victory it had not won, moved with devastating precision to prove it.

The story of how we arrived at this moment requires revisiting the hysteria that followed Iran’s announcement of its strait closure. When the Islamic Republic declared that it was imposing a blockade on the Strait of Hormuz and would begin collecting transit tolls from commercial shipping, the reaction from European capitals and American newsrooms was immediate and euphoric, at least for those who had spent the prior 5 weeks insisting that Operation Epic Fury was a catastrophic miscalculation. French President Macron began negotiating directly with Tehran. Pedro Sánchez, the Prime Minister of Spain, did the same. European nations that had not maintained diplomatic relations with Iran in years suddenly began reopening embassies. Iran, which just weeks earlier had been absorbing wave after wave of American airpower, was now the belle of the ball. (Read more.)

Share

The Rot That Bred the Reich

 From Celina's Substack:

To understand the death of a civilisation, one must first walk through its ruins. The scene is Berlin, sometime in the mid-1920s, beneath the blinding, electric glare of neon and the suffocating, narcotic haze of the Berliner Luft, an atmosphere that locals gleefully described as an amphetamine-like air that made hearts race, pupils dilate, and morals evaporate until dawn.1 In the shadowed, labyrinthine alleys of a shattered empire, the streets of the capital have been entirely surrendered to a bacchanalia of unprecedented depravity. Prostitutes in various stages of undress crowd the cobblestones. They are openly aggressive, their ranks swollen by pregnant mothers, desperate war widows, and adolescents, all selling their flesh for the price of a meal.2 On every street corner, hawkers peddle cocaine, morphine, and opium to passersby, while newsstands prominently display nudist magazines dedicated exclusively to the exhibition of children.3

Push past the heavy, smoke-stained velvet curtains of the subterranean cabarets, and the full, suffocating scope of the abyss reveals itself. Here, glittering shows parade acres of sweaty, perfumed flesh to the applause of an audience intoxicated by a potent mixture of ecstasy, terror, and moral decay. Cross-dressing men perform grotesque pantomimes of traditional womanhood, while tuxedo-clad women mock the remnants of patriarchal authority, puffing cigars and sneering at the ghosts of their fathers.

For the modern, liberal apologists of the era, this explosion of libertinism is often retroactively celebrated as a vibrant, avant-garde renaissance, a brief, shining moment of progressive emancipation before the darkness of fascism fell. It is romanticised in our modern cinema and theatre as a glorious rebellion against the stuffy confines of tradition. But to the ordinary, rooted citizens of the German nation, the truth was far darker and far more evident. (Read more.)

Share

Deeply Moving Story That Brings History to Life

 

A review of Generalissima from "Silver Rose":

I had previously read the first volume of this trilogy a few years ago and was captivated by the romance of King Charles I and Queen Henriette-Marie. In Book 2, they spend more time apart, but it remains romantic, leading to very poignant and memorable moments when either reuniting, departing, or, for example, attempting to read one another's encoded letters with frustration and yearning. Overall, there is much more focus on their children also in this novel. Elena Maria Vidal's superpower is her ability to vividly depict characters based on real-life historical figures so that your emotional investment and curiosity lead you to look them up. After doing so in some cases before finishing GENERALISSIMA, I actually ended up noticing foreshadowing when returning to the book. (Of course, it may be more prudent to wait to avoid spoilers. ;) ) There are other key figures that likewise warranted that Google search, among them Jeffrey the Dwarf. He had a unique personality, but I found myself intrigued in general:

While referring to their short stature rather than any sort of fantasy context, the mention of dwarfs—and even, while not seen, a giant—allowed, when coupled with beautifully lyrical references to Arthurian legend, a splash of a fairy-tale essence amidst a grittier plot. That isn't to say that fairy tales are without danger or the real within the fantastical, for they are, but, rather, that the overall tone is different here and more intense than in the first book. Nevertheless, beauty, love, and faith shine through, and there are moments of joy and Light. There is a dance scene set to "Greensleeves" that may be envisioned as one of merry yet almost ethereal times past. There are moments of prayer and Confession in even the most dismal of circumstances. While I don't wish to give spoilers, I must also mention a particular scene on the beach that is stirring in its mixture of intensity, hope, and, in other respects, overwhelming emotion. The courage of the principal characters is truly noteworthy. Of course, it is quite a moment when the title of the book comes into play. (Read more.)

Share

Talking Nonsense in the Name of God

Let us remember that the Crusades were initiated by the popes to free the Holy Land from Muslims. Various nations of Islam had committed sacrilege in the Holy Places, raped monks and nuns, destroyed churches or turned them into mosques, while enslaving thousands of Christians. Girls were sold as sex slaves. Boys were often castrated so they could serve as eunuchs in the sultan's palace. This went on for over a thousand years. Various popes called upon Christian warriors to fight the Muslims in order to free the Christians of the Middle East. So while popes encourage peace most have known that sometimes battle is necessary to liberate the persecuted.  

Meanwhile, in the present day, so many Catholics do not know the most basic moral teachings about chastity, contraception, abortion, celibacy outside of marriage, and keeping holy the Lord's Day. Not to mention all the theological teachings about the Holy Eucharist and the Blessed Mother. It is the responsibility of the Shepherds to teach them! And where is the outcry from our Shepherds about the Christians being murdered, raped and enslaved around the world, in Nigeria, Somalia, Syria, China, Indonesia, India! What about the blatant and repeated human rights violations in several Muslim countries against their own women? What about the slave trade which flourishes in Africa? What about the human trafficking in the Americas? There are some major moral issues which require the full attention of the Holy Father and the bishops.

From Andrew Klavan at The New Jerusalem:

If the faithful are nothing else, they ought to be clear-eyed and honest about the way things are. Politicians can deal in virtuous-sounding lies, but not priests. A politician can say, “Poverty is the underlying cause of crime,” in order to sell the public on some useless program that will increase his patronage power and line the pockets of his friends. But God-fearing men should see that the logic doesn’t hold. How, for instance, does such an idea explain well-heeled criminals like Jordan Belfort and Bernie Madoff? A Christian should understand that the sinful human heart, with its greed and cruelty, is crime’s real cause. Poverty merely limits the sorts of crimes one can commit. Once you see that, ideas like defund the police and end incarceration reveal themselves to be works of either ignorance or cynicism. Sin is with us until the end of days. So, therefore, are cops and jails.

Likewise war. In a world where men like Hitler and ideas like Islamism can define the ethos of a people, bullets will sometimes have to fly. I say this without jingoism or belligerence. It is a simple fact of life. We can’t love our spouses, play with our children, do our jobs, read books or stroll through parks unless tough guys with weapons guard our borders and our streets, ready to fight when the need arises. Pacifism, if it is not suicidal, is just straight up wicked. It simply shunts the moral responsibility of waging war onto another man’s shoulders.

“Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s,” Jesus said, “and unto God the things that are God’s.” I take this to mean in part that his preachments, if they are to make any sense, cannot be taken as a political program. “Love your enemy,” is not a foreign policy prescription. “Turn the other cheek,” is not a recommended reform of the justice system. These are formative ways of seeing the world and its inevitable troubles as God sees them: as tragedies that spring from the bottomless fountain of our sin. They will continue to exist as long as we are what we are. One hopes that leaders shaped by the Christian ethos will deal with them as justly as possible.

Each person born is going to find himself in that blood-soaked melodrama known as history. He may have the good luck to live in a rich and secure society governed by the rule of law, or he may get the short end of the stick and find himself dumped into the midst of chaos and oppression. Accepting Christ can teach him humility, grant him peace and lead him to salvation. But it can’t shield him from the truth — because it is only by and in and for the Truth that he is saved. (Read more.)

Share

Remembering Evelyn Waugh

 From Chronicles:

Evelyn Waugh was the 20^th century’s finest satirist and perhaps the greatest in the English-speaking world after Jonathan Swift. Born in 1903 in London, Waugh was the second son of a prominent publisher whose firm, Chapman and Hall, published many of Waugh’s own books. He was educated at Oxford, where he read history for two years and lived a rather dissipated, rebellious life, leaving without a degree. Waugh turned seriously to writing only in the late 1920s. In 1930, he married his first wife, also named Evelyn. Within a year, she abandoned Waugh for another man—a sense of betrayal haunted Waugh for decades and may have contributed to his conversion to Roman Catholicism that same year. In 1937, after his first marriage was annulled, he married Laura Herbert, a Catholic. They produced seven children.

Waugh’s first novel, Decline and Fall (1928), announces his lifelong preoccupation with the theme explored by Oswald Spengler in The Decline of the West. Though Waugh never embraced Spengler’s ponderously Teutonic theorizing about the morphology of civilizations, he shared Spengler’s view that the sun had all but set upon the West. Everywhere he turned, Waugh saw the collapse of classical and Christian moral standards and the erosion, driven by egalitarian envy, of the hierarchies that had sustained the European social order for centuries. 

In five early novels, Waugh explored the follies of the London set known as the Bright Young Things. Employing emotionally detached narrators, these novels expose—without any explicit moralizing—the utterly vacant lives of a generation of listless souls who parrot faux Cockney dialect and perpetually gad about in search of superficial distractions: champagne parties, car races, jazz clubs, scavenger hunts. Driven by ennui or apolitical nihilism, they are the disenchanted children of the British aristocracy. (Read more.)

Share

Audrey Hepburn’s Pearl Necklace In 'Breakfast At Tiffany’s'

 From British Vogue:

Under the lavender light of dawn in New York City, a yellow taxi stops in front of Tiffany & Co. on Fifth Avenue. A slender figure emerges, dressed in a sleeveless black Givenchy dress, her arms covered by elbow-length gloves. She moves slowly towards the shop window. The camera lingers first on her back: her hair swept into an elegant updo, almond-shaped diamanté clips at her ears, and the open cut of the dress revealing her shoulders. Above the black straps of her dress runs a five-strand pearl necklace, luminescent and striking. As the camera pans, the delicate features of Audrey Hepburn’s face come into view. Her eyes are hidden behind dark sunglasses; a small diamanté coronet crowns her hair. As Holly Golightly, Hepburn elegantly bites into a croissant and sips coffee from a paper cup.

The opening frames of 1961’s Breakfast at Tiffany’s are some of the most memorable – and most stylish – in cinematic history. Lily Collins (taking a break from playing Emily in Paris, Rome and potentially Greece), is set to star as Hepburn in a film about the making of the adaptation of Truman Capote’s novella. While Hepburn’s Hubert de Givenchy gown remains one of the most iconic dresses ever captured on film (she and the French couturier had a 40-year friendship, with him also designing her costumes for 1953’s Funny Face and 1957’s Sabrina), the pearl necklace she wears – which closes at the front with a sparkling clasp – is also one of the most memorable jewellery pieces in film history. Poignantly, the most famous pearl necklace in the history of cinema was not made of pearls at all. Rather it is non-precious costume jewellery, created by the French jewellery designer Roger Scemama.

To begin with, the film faithfully echoes the look described in Capote’s story, in which Golightly is introduced wearing “a slim cool black dress, black sandals, a pearl choker”. The multi-strand pearl necklace complements the architectural simplicity of the dress. On set, a necklace made of real pearls and precious stones would have been an impractical costuming choice: it would have taken longer to produce – and of course cost far more. But most importantly of all, it would not have been right for Holly Golightly – a young woman in the process of inventing her identity and her place in New York society. As her supposed talent agent, OJ Berman, memorably tells Paul Varjak (the “kept man” and struggling writer played by George Peppard): “She is a phoney.” Costume jewellery, therefore, becomes a perfect metaphor for a character whose glamour is largely performative. (Read more.)

Share

Strait Flush

 From Tierney's Real News:

My view is that the Iranians would never publicly accept any agreement at the end of these talks because that would mean admitting defeat. My guess is they’ll go back to their hidey holes and issue propaganda spinning the talks differently and then agree quietly to whatever Trump wants.

The good news is that Iran just admitted for all the world to hear that they want nukes and JD Vance confirmed it. That, to me, was worth the trip.

Meanwhile, the Strait is open for business because of America. The U.S. military has officially begun a mine-clearing operation in the Strait of Hormuz as of Saturday, April 11, 2026, under Operation Epic Fury.

Everything else you’re hearing is fake news.

Two guided-missile destroyers, the USS Frank E. Petersen Jr. (DDG-121) and USS Michael Murphy (DDG-112), have already transited the Hormuz Strait to establish a safe passage and begin the clearance process.

Their objective is to remove over a dozen Iranian naval mines (specifically Maham 3 and Maham 7 limpet mines) that were placed in the Strait by rogue IRGC small boats in the past few weeks.

The Navy is employing a layered, robot-heavy doctrine to clear the mines without risking sailors in the water:

Before robots enter, U.S. forces (including A-10 Warthogs and destroyers) continue to hunt and destroy remaining Iranian mine-laying vessels and coastal depots to prevent new mines from being deployed during the operation.

CENTCOM reports destroying over 44 mine-layers and 120+ vessels so far.

MH-60S Seahawk helicopters fly over the strait equipped with the ALMDS (Airborne Laser Mine Detection System), which uses blue-green lasers to scan the shallow water column and create 3D images of floating mines.

MK-18 Kingfish unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) and AQS-20C towed sonar systems map the sea floor to find bottom mines.

New autonomous assets like the Manta Ray and Lamprey UUVs are also reportedly on standby for long-endurance scouting. (Read more.)

Share

Rohmer at Camelot

 From Charlotte Allen at Quillette:

Rohmer was crazy about Chrétien de Troyes and especially about Perceval, which he made his adolescent students read during the decade he spent in his twenties teaching literature at a lycée before he could support himself in the film world. In 1964, he had made a 23-minute short film for French educational television titled Perceval ou le Conte du Graal (Perceval, or the Story of the Grail). For this project, he used illustrations from a 13th-century manuscript housed at the Bibliothèque Nationale de France in Paris. In an interview for L’Avant-Scène Cinéma, Rohmer described the text of Perceval as “one of the most beautiful in French literature.”

He was right. Chrétien de Troyes was not only a literary master in his own right but the inventor of “Arthurian” literature as a literary genre: stories about King Arthur and his court that have kept poets, novelists, playwrights, moviemakers, illustrators, and comic-book writers busy for more than 800 years. He didn’t invent King Arthur himself. Chroniclers in England and Wales had already taken note of Arthur—who might have been a real 5th- or 6th-century warlord, or might have simply been an invented folk-hero—as a majestic Celtic-British ruler who defended his country against the invading Angles and Saxons after the Romans deserted Britain. By the mid-12th century, thanks to the imaginative energy of chroniclers and bards, the canonical saga of Arthur’s life was well-established: the sword Excalibur, Merlin the magician, Queen Guinevere, the isle of Avalon.

But it was Chrétien who shifted the focus of the Arthurian stories away from King Arthur himself to his court and its individual knights. He likely invented Sir Lancelot as Guinevere’s secret lover in one of his narrative poems (five of them survive, and there may have been more), as well as Camelot as the site of one of Arthur’s castles. Perceval was another of his inventions, and he probably invented the Grail as well. His stories are so full-blown that generations of academic researchers and amateur scholars have searched for their possible sources in Welsh and Irish myths and legends, as well as in the oral lore of medieval Brittany, to which many Celtic Britons had fled after the Anglo-Saxon invasions. (Read more.)

Share

Desserts for Spring and Easter

 

From Victoria:

The gentle blush of a sugared rose petal adds the crowning touch to Angel Food Cakes. Beneath a rippling cloud of sweetened whipped cream, delicate sponge cake holds a luscious surprise. The first forkful reveals an abundance of raspberries and jam—the ruby-hued fruit filling a delightful complement to the other components of the dessert. For a variation on England’s chilled dessert of cooked, puréed fruit (typically gooseberries) folded into whipped cream, sample sunny Lemon Shortbread Fool. Crumbled cookies add delightful crunch to tantalizing swirls of citrus and cream. Hibiscus tea, an infusion made from the subtropical roselle bloom, adds tartness to the airy dessert filling in our decadent Chocolate Mousse in Chocolate Cups. Raspberries, edible flowers, and a dusting of confectioners’ sugar draw attention to these artful treats. Our pièce de résistance is a scrumptious pairing featuring fruits swimming in silky-smooth cream. This fresh and fragrant Berries and Cream delight mixes strawberries and raspberries with whipped cream flavored with raspberry liqueur. (Read more.)

From Southern Living:

To longtime Southern Living readers, it might come as no surprise that the most searched cake in the South is the Hummingbird Cake. Any way you slice it, this cake’s classic combination of banana, pineapple, and cinnamon has long made it one of our most popular recipes across all recipe genres. The 45-year-old recipe, first submitted to the magazine in 1978 by Mrs. L.H. Wiggins of Greensboro, North Carolina, has been reinvented into Bundt cakes, pancakes, and even whoopie pies. But the classic three-layer cake enveloped in cream cheese frosting is still our readers’ preferred way to enjoy this dessert. Nationwide, ‘dump cakes’ proved popular for their ease, with no special tools required to make these no-fail cakes. Despite the extra effort needed to assemble the hummingbird cake, Southerners are more than willing to put in the time for the final delicious result. (Read more.)

Share

Globalism is a Crime Scene

 From Welcome to Absurdistan:

 First of all, you wittering morons, MAGA is not Trump or the glitterati. MAGA grew out of the heartland, the flyover country, the people who make the world of centimillionaires like Owens, Carlson, Kelly, not to mention all the idiots on stipends at the New York Times and Atlantic and in D.C., possible. They saw what the rules-based order had created right on top of them, and they were the ones who built the ideas upon which Trump operates. They saw the results of mass migration of the violent and primitive, the insistence on bankrupting green requirements, the flooding of drugs, the destruction of the family, the stripping away of access to resources, the metric ton of regulatory horror - and said NO. That rejection is now happening in every other country in the world. Americans, the real ones, not the glitterati, led this, but everywhere, MAGA is enjoined. Just this week, for instance, the Irish literally shut down the country. Why? Remigration now, buddy.

 It didn’t work. The pallet-loads of verbiage, the suffocating nonsense that supported the Third Way, the endlessly cited rules-based order, the flood of intellectuals from the Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, the Aspen Institute, Chatham House, the Atlantic Council? Failed failed failed failed failed. They all need to fold their tents and slink away in the night. (Read more.)

Share

Something Dark Is Going On

 From Chet Nagel:

Seven of those dead scientists were working for the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) or organizations to which it provides funding. AFRL develops the most sensitive technologies in the American defense arsenal.

1. Monica Jacinto Reza disappeared in the Angeles National Forest in California on 22 June 2025. Hiking with friends, she was last seen waving to a fellow hiker 30 feet behind the group. Her body was never found despite an intensive search involving drones, helicopters and canine units. The only items of hers that were found were a cap and lip balm.

Reza, 60 years old at the time of her disappearance, was an aerospace engineer and Technical Fellow at Aerojet Rocketdyne who later moved to NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. She was the co-inventor of the Monel alloy. The Monel family of nickel-based superalloys was developed by Aerojet Rocketdyne to withstand oxygen-rich environments and extreme heat in rocket engines.

Reza’s mentor and co-inventor of the Monel alloy, Dallis Hardwick, died on 5 January 2014, seemingly of natural causes.

She worked closely with Air Force Major General William “Neil” McCasland who commanded the AFRL from 2011 to 2013 and oversaw funding for her Monel alloy research program. (Read more.)

Share

How Raphael Made—and Unmade—the Renaissance

 

From ArtNet:

Raphael is one of those names that everyone knows. He is the prince of painters, a master of the High Renaissance. And the Metropolitan Museum of Art has given him the full blockbuster treatment in a highly anticipated exhibition called “Raphael: Sublime Poetry.”

The show is the first comprehensive international loan exhibition ever dedicated to him in the United States. There are 237 works in total—33 paintings, 142 drawings—and his Sistine Chapel tapestries. There are loans from the Louvre, the Vatican Museums, the Prado, the Uffizi, and the British Museum. Many of these works, according to the Met, have never been shown together, and some have never previously left Europe. Curated by Carmen C. Bambach, it took 17 years to assemble.

No one quite captured divine beauty like Raphael did. But what is the story within the story of this artist who left indelible mark on western art? I’m joined by art critic and podcast co-host Ben Davis, who has just published a review of the exhibition, to dive into that question. (Read more.)

Share

Twelver Doomsday Cult

 From Tierney's Real News:

We all know the danger of Iran getting a nuclear weapon—it’s a nightmare scenario that could change the world overnight. A detonation would not just endanger Israel, but could rain radioactive fallout across Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and beyond. Prevailing winds would carry lethal poison across the Middle East, crippling the region and reshaping civilization as we know it.

Iran is no longer just a regional menace — it’s a global one. Advances in its missile program now give Tehran the ability to mount a nuclear warhead on an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching Europe — and, in time, even the eastern United States. A single launch could erase cities and usher in a new dark age.

Yet Iran stands out as uniquely dangerous in the region and the world - not because of its ancient Persian heritage or the Iranian people themselves, who once thrived under the Shah. Under the Shah, Iran was a prosperous ally of America and Israel. Women were free and the nation’s oil wealth funded growth.

What replaced that modern Persian confidence was something horrifying: Ayatollah Khomeini’s fusion of apocalyptic Twelver Shia Islam and atheist Soviet-style Communism. He combined them together in what is known as the Twelver Shia version of Islamo-Communism. It’s this “red‑green” hybrid — part cleric, part commissar — that makes Iran uniquely dangerous in the 21st century. (Read more.)

Share

Mary and Isabella – the Women in Cages

 From History...the Interesting Bits:

On 25 March 1306 Mary, Christian, Elizabeth and little Marjorie were all present when Robert the Bruce was crowned King Robert I by Isabella MacDuff, Countess of Buchan, who claimed her family’s hereditary right to crown Scotland’s kings (despite her being married to a Comyn). The Earls of Fife had, for centuries, claimed the hereditary right to crown Scotland’s kings. However, in 1306, the earl was only a teenager, in English custody, and a loyal devotee of Edward I. It fell to the courageous Isabella MacDuff, the young earl’s aunt, to claim the hereditary right to perform the ritual.

Isabella’s husband was John Comyn, Earl of Buchan, friend and cousin to the John Comyn killed in the church in Dumfries. Isabella knew that she was not only facing the wrath of King Edward but also her husband in participating in Robert’s inauguration as king. Isabella’s participation was an act of bravery and defiance. She would have known that her actions would mean there was no going back. In supporting Robert the Bruce, the man who stood accused of John Comyn’s murder, Isabella turned against her husband and his entire family, people she had lived among for her entire married life. Isabella is said to have stolen one of her husband’s destriers for the ride to Scone to place the crown on the new king’s head. However, it is also suggested that Robert sent the Earl of Atholl to fetch Isabella from her lands, to perform the inauguration, indicating she was rather reluctant to play her part in the open defiance of Edward I.

With the murder of Comyn hanging over him, Robert the Bruce wanted to ensure that his inauguration was an imitation of that of Alexander III, to reinforce his legitimacy and respectability as king. In the absence of the royal crown of Scotland, a gold circlet was placed on Robert’s head. The ceremony may have been overseen by bishops Wishart and Lamberton, though both claimed they were not present when questioned by Edward I. Bishop Lamberton, as Bishop of St Andrews and senior prelate in Scotland, certainly celebrated High Mass for the new king and queen two days later, on 27 March.

Robert’s coronation was the start of the most desperate period of his life – and that of his supporters. Edward I of England was never one to acquiesce when his will was flouted; he sent his army into Scotland to hunt down the new king and his adherents. After Robert’s defeat by the English at Methven in 1306, he went into hiding in the Highlands. (Read more.)

Share