Thursday, August 8, 2024

On the Pacific Crest Trail, Hikers Are Not Happy

When art is not appreciated. Personally, I think that people should respect public property. You can do what you want on your own land but not on land that belongs to everybody. From Backpack:

We’ve all come across something similar along one hiking trail or another: “fairy houses” made of sticks, rock stacks along riverbanks, designs made out of pebbles on the ground. Some hikers delight in these surprises, while others detest them. Many experienced hikers are quick to call foul on Leave No Trace violations. But is there a line between harmless tokens of creative expression and true negative impact on the environment?

In response to those clay figurines, many Facebook users were loud and clear: Nature is no place for human art of any kind.

Commenter Kat Sink wrote, “I’m an artist and I love art but wild, natural places are not where these belong. In the wild, they are trash.”

Others took a more lenient approach: “Lighten up! A giggle on the trail from an artist is fine by me,” wrote Facebook user Mike Zawatsky.

Others pointed out that this problem is small potatoes in comparison to heavy littering that exists in certain high-traffic areas. “I’d much rather see a painted rock than discarded tissue,” wrote another commenter.

It’s a fair point: Stumbling upon a mouse-sized cabin made of twigs or a lump of clay that blends into its surroundings is generally far less offensive than walking a trail littered with Snickers wrappers and cloudy Mountain Dew bottles—and something easily dismantled or made of materials found in the area is unlikely to cause lasting ecological harm. But for some hikers, any aesthetic reminder of other humans detracts from an otherwise uninterrupted experience of nature. (Read more.)

Share

No comments: