Tuesday, January 6, 2026

Trump Acted. Raskin Whined.

 From Direct Line News:

Let’s start with the core reality Raskin tiptoes around while pretending to acknowledge it: Nicolás Maduro is not a normal head of state. He is not a misunderstood reformer. He is a narco-dictator indicted by the United States, accused of turning an entire nation into a cocaine pipeline while starving its people and exporting chaos throughout the hemisphere. When the U.S. government acts against someone like Maduro, it is not “imperialism.” It is law enforcement on a scale.

Raskin’s constitutional argument collapses under scrutiny. The president did not declare war on Venezuela. He authorized a targeted military operation to apprehend an indicted criminal enemy of the United States. Presidents of both parties have conducted such operations for decades without prior congressional approval against terrorists, warlords, pirates, and narco-traffickers. Congress is not consulted before every special operation any more than a judge convenes a jury before issuing an arrest warrant. The Constitution makes the president commander-in-chief for a reason.

Raskin’s second claim that drug trafficking was merely a “pretext” is even more detached from reality. The U.S. Department of Justice has spent years building a case against Maduro, accusing him of conspiring to flood the United States with cocaine using state institutions and foreign terrorist groups. This is not speculative. It is documented. Maduro’s regime has been sanctioned, indicted, and internationally isolated precisely because it operates as a criminal enterprise masquerading as a government.

To distract from that reality, Raskin points to President Trump’s pardon of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández. This is classic whataboutism masquerading as moral clarity. Hernández’s pardon, controversial or not, does not magically erase Maduro’s crimes. Nor does it invalidate the mountains of evidence against the Venezuelan regime. Law enforcement does not stop arresting bank robbers because one criminal elsewhere received clemency. That argument would be laughed out of any courtroom. (Read more.)

Share

No comments: