Monday, January 19, 2026

Congress Should Enact Trump’s Great Healthcare Plan Now

 From Amuse on X:

The American healthcare system presents a familiar puzzle. It absorbs nearly $5T each year, yet ordinary patients rarely know what care will cost, why prices differ so wildly, or who is accountable when costs rise without corresponding improvements in outcomes. Conservatives have long diagnosed the problem correctly. It is not that Americans spend too little on healthcare. It is that spending is insulated from market discipline, obscured by intermediaries, and structured to protect incumbents rather than patients. President Donald J Trump’s Great Healthcare Plan is best understood as a systematic attempt to reverse those distortions by restoring agency to patients and accountability to providers, insurers, and drug manufacturers.

 Begin with prescription drugs. Americans pay more for the same medications than patients in other developed countries. This is not an accident of chemistry or logistics. It is the predictable result of a pricing system in which the largest buyer in the world, the US government, refuses to negotiate as aggressively as smaller foreign systems and allows manufacturers to segment markets to maximize revenue. Trump’s Most-Favored-Nation framework cuts directly through this structure. The principle is simple. Americans should not subsidize lower prices abroad. If a drug company is willing to sell a medication for a given price in Germany or Japan, it can sell it for that price here.

 Critics often respond that such an approach risks innovation. But this objection confuses incentives. Innovation depends on expected returns across global markets, not on extracting monopoly rents from one population while offering discounts to another. By anchoring US prices to verified international benchmarks, the Great Healthcare Plan forces manufacturers to compete on efficiency and value rather than political leverage. The experience of Trump’s first term insulin reforms and the Administration’s recent voluntary negotiations confirms the point. Prices fell. Access expanded. Innovation did not collapse. (Read more.)


Share

No comments: