Wednesday, June 7, 2023

A Tale of Three Cities & the End of the Old New World Order

 From The Imaginative Conservative:

The year 1989 may well be seen by future historians as one of those rare pivotal years of this past millennium—like 1066, 1492, 1793, and 1914—that profoundly altered the direction of Western Civilization. It is, of course, still too early to say for certain that we as a society set ourselves on a dangerous collision course that year, but none should be surprised if it turns out that lost opportunities in 1989 (and subsequent years) will have dire consequences for the rest of this century. The events that unfolded in Beijing, Moscow, and Washington have all the elements of a jumbled Greek tragedy: good intentions, foolish misunderstandings, unspeakable violence, and that most crucial of all ingredients: overweening hubris.

In May of that same year, I was a mid-level American diplomat who had just gotten an assignment he had dreamed of for many years: Senior Watch Officer (SWO) in the State Department’s Operations Center, an office designed to detect, monitor, and report on crises around the world. Timing could not have been better. That year witnessed a stunning number of crises, but the two most influential were the Tiananmen Square Massacre and the Fall of the Berlin Wall. How we interpreted and responded to these two crises have paved our path for the foreseeable future. We might have changed direction at various points along the way, but we never did, and we are now—as in any true tragedy—increasingly unable to make amends. (Read more.)


Share

How Tolkien Teaches Us to Fight Our Dragons

 From Aleteia:

Then we compared Bilbo killing the spider to Bard the Bowman killing Smaug later in the book. Both characters triumph over fear to do the hard but right thing, and this defeat of evil emboldens them to do greater good. Finally, I asked the kids, “How can you fight your dragons, or your spiders, like Bilbo and Bard? What would it look like to kill the dragons in your own life?”

Their answers were so thoughtful! One kid said he would fight against his “dragon” of anger and a bad temper. Another would fight the “dragon” of not wanting to listen to her parents. Each child came up with a “dragon” they wanted to fight, and it was inspiring to hear their resolutions. So if you’re looking for a little inspiration today, I want to share Tolkien’s wisdom with you. Doing hard things, even when they scare us, makes us feel more confident and comfortable in our skin. We all have our dragons to fight, so let’s face them with courage and perseverance like Bilbo Baggins and his comrades. (Read more.)

Share

Tuesday, June 6, 2023

The Black Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt


 From Greek Reporter:

Netflix’s Queen Cleopatra docuseries has caused an immense storm of controversy surrounding its depiction of Cleopatra VII Philopator as a black woman, and whilst Cleopatra herself was not black, there were indeed black pharaohs who ruled over Egypt at one point in the 8th and 7th centuries BC.

The 25th Dynasty, also known as the Nubian Dynasty, or Black Pharaohs, ruled Egypt between 744 BC and 656 BC as part of the wider Kushite Empire. The 25th Dynasty originated from the city-state of Napata in Nubia, in what is today Sudan.

The Nubian Kushite civilization, from whom the 25th Dynasty originated, could, like the Egyptians,  boast of impressive architectural, artistic, and cultural achievements. Sadly, this enigmatic civilization has been overshadowed by its better-known members and does not achieve the attention it deserves in a mainstream setting. (Read more.)

 

Cleopatra's dynasty were Greek. Also from The Greek Reporter:

Cleopatra VII Philopator is one of the most famous figures of antiquity, but few people are familiar with the fascinating history of her ancestors. The Ptolemaic Dynasty, to which she belonged, was founded by Ptolemy I Soter, one of the generals of Alexander the Great. This family, of Macedonian Greek origin, ruled Egypt for almost three centuries, leaving an indelible mark on one of the oldest civilizations in the world.

Ptolemaic Egypt was an interesting and complex mixture of cultures. On the one hand, the ruling Hellenistic elite could be incredibly insular, preferring to marry almost exclusively within their own circles and preferring to adhere to Greek customs. Yet the Ptolemies also embraced the syncretism of ancient Greek and Egyptian religious beliefs, aesthetic sensibilities, and culture.

Ptolemy (Greek: Πτολεμαῖος) was born in 367 BC to a Macedonian Greek nobleman called Lagus and a woman called Arsionoe. He was present at the very beginning of Alexander the Great’s life and has been referred to as a youthful friend of the future king, although Ptolemy was about 11 years older so he more likely acted as an adviser throughout Alexander’s life.

Ptolemy accompanied Alexander during his military campaigns where he earned the king’s trust as a dependable companion. In 330 BC he was appointed to be a somatophylax, one of the seven bodyguards and deputies of Alexander. (Read more.)


Many Greeks are upset that Cleopatra's Greek heritage has been whitewashed in a recent Netflix series. From Neo Kosmos:

Never have I seen so many inaccuracies in a documentary that it is difficult to know where to begin. In a scene which is more comic relief than historic auctoritas, Afro-American Professor Shelley Haley, a Netflix chosen expert to comment on Cleopatra tells us that her grandmother had once advised her that Cleopatra was black. Haley also notes that in a dream Cleopatra emboldened her to tell the Queen’s story. As the Americans say, you just can’t make this stuff up.

So let us dissect this claim. Firstly, historical texts note that Cleopatra belonged to the Graeco-Macedonian Ptolemaic line who had ruled Egypt from 332-30 BC. Ptolemy I Soter, who had been a friend and general of Alexander the Great began the dynasty which ended with the death of Cleopatra. The Ptolemaics continued the Pharoanic custom of incestual marriages which prevented them from marrying outside their Graeco-Macedonian blood line. This is where it gets interesting. While we know that Cleopatra’s father was Ptolemy XII Auletes, it is unclear to who her mother was. This critical detail has been played up by Netflix historians to mean that Cleopatra’s mother was possibly of sub-Saharan origin, just like Professor Haley’s now famous grandmother had said. Cleopatra’s mother was more likely to have been the Ptolemaic Cleopatra Tryphaena who was mother to Cleopatra’s sister Berenice. Even if Cleopatra Tryphaena had some Egyptian blood, as the historian Duane W. Roller notes, this does not mean that Cleopatra was black African. This argument can be quickly demolished by the plethora of representations of Cleopatra depicted in sculpture, paintings and coins which show her having a Mediterranean appearance. Next, we have a written account by the Roman philosopher statesman Marcus Tullius Cicero who had met Queen Cleopatra when she had travelled to Rome in 46 BC to meet her lover Julius Caesar. Cicero refers to Cleopatra as ‘the graecula’ meaning ‘Greek woman’ in Latin. There is no mention of her being black African. Case closed.

Another point of contention of the Cleopatra documentary is its Afro-centric influence. The word “Afrocentrism” was first coined in 1962 to describe an ideological movement which focuses on the historical achievements and contributions of Africans. The movement took pace in the mid 20th century in order to challenge the dominance of European misconceptions and distortions of African societies. While its initial motivations were moral and right, Afrocentric thinkers went on to write their own distorted version of history. For example, a leading Afrocentrist Cheikh Anta Diop argued that the Egyptian civilisation was a black African civilisation – the first to develop science, farming writing, arts and the calendar. Apart from the 25th Dynasty (747-656 BC) which was ruled by black Kushite kings, all other Egyptian Pharoanic dynasties were not sub-Saharan Africans. There is no compelling evidence to support Diop’s claim. On the contrary, extensive archaeological research reveals that it was the older Sumerian civilisation in Mesopotamia which had developed the first writing and numerical systems, the plough, irrigation and farming and the wheel. (Read more.)

Share

Minimalism: The Destruction of Christian Society

 From Catholic Exchange:

In a world that is devoid of virtue and beauty there continues to be a search. It is innate that every soul experiences, as it longs for God, and can only be found fulfilled with His love. Modern society has removed the search for God and has motivated wandering souls to search for their own personal desires. And where there is a lack of Divine Love there is also a lack of beauty.

How has this lack of beauty and love manifested itself in society? It has been a slow process as personal desires based on emotion become stronger, lack of reason encompasses decision-making, and virtues are no longer interwoven with life. And what has resulted from this transformation? Minimalism. A movement that embraces simplicity without purpose. A movement that is formed for those searching towards an inner self-love rather than a Divine Love. Ultimately, a mission that is devoid of God, His mercy, His justice, and His love.

What is minimalism and how has it impacted society as a whole? Minimalism has been encouraged by a reigning group of individuals who do not promote the growth of the soul and spiritual life, but instead, where a lifestyle of simplicity without virtue is encouraged. Please do not misunderstand me – there is great beauty in simplicity. It was the earmark of Christian virtue for centuries. Even some of the saintly kings and queens had a simple aura about them, like Saint Elizabeth of Hungary, Saint Margaret of Scotland, and Saint King Louis IX. Their stately positions offered them earthly pleasures, yet, as they lived in holiness, simplicity, and beauty because they lived for God’s glory.

The concept of beauty in the modern world has been distorted. Very few women are referred to as “beautiful” anymore. Is this a result of a society lacking in virtue? Is this the result of men no longer respecting femininity? Or is this a result of feminism pushing its own form of “beauty” for decades? Whatever the case may be, there is a lack in virtuous beauty. A soul that is not in search of virtue and holiness will not exhibit true beauty. As many women find their feminine traits as barriers, rather than beneficial, society has slowly begun to move away from beauty in several areas. As a result, the decrease in beauty has led to a movement of minimalism. There is no longer a desire to embrace beauty and simplicity in parallel as so many saints have done in the past.

Minimalism has become a movement void of beauty to remove the “extras” – whether that be an intricately styled gold frame replaced with black lines to embody a painting or the architecture of a building to resemble a solid shape rather than the original interwoven designs of the Gothic era. The detailed architecture curtailing over the course of history has left the once carefully crafted designs in the dust for the history books. As so much of society desires to forget the past, so too they ignore beauty along with tradition. Rather than preserve the beauty of old architecture, every excuse is found to tear it down and rebuild with a modern style. And what is this style that has been pervading our society for over 60 decades? It is a modern abhorrence of beauty, devoid of virtuous simplicity but invigorated through minimalistic lines. (Read more.)

Share

The Crown: Monaco Edition?

 From Tatler:

The House of Windsor gave birth to The Crown. But another royal saga is in the works that is poised to offer even more scandal, drama and intrigue. Monaco will track the grand history of the ruling Grimaldi family, whose members include Prince Albert II and Princess Charlene, and the late Prince Rainier III and Grace Kelly. Tantalisingly, the project has the blessing of its royal subjects (or, more accurately, their descendants): it is being produced by a production company headed by Princess Caroline of Hanover’s sons – and Grace Kelly’s grandsons – Andrea and Pierre Casiraghi, and daughter-in-law Beatrice Casiraghi (née Borromeo). Dimitri Rassam, who is married to Princess Caroline’s daughter Charlotte Casiraghi, is also involved. 

‘I thought I knew this story but it turns out I had only scratched the surface. Simply said, it is epic in every way: family, adventure, intrigue,’ Rassam said of the project, according to Variety. ‘The true story of the foundation of the Grimaldis of Monaco some seven centuries ago is one of the most captivating stories I have had the chance of discovering thanks to the initiative of Beatrice, Andrea and Pierre.’ (Read more.)


Share

Monday, June 5, 2023

The Unbreakable Child


 Has anyone wondered where all the sadism of World War II came from when many of those engaged in brutality had grown up in Christendom, and some were even Catholic? I have read a number of things about abuse in the Church before Vatican II. It confirms what I was always told by old nuns and priests that the problems that have almost destroyed the Church since 1970 did not just come out of nowhere at the time of the Council. There were problems around that the public was not aware of. Yes, even with the Latin Mass and all the traditional devotions, novenas, processions, etc. there were several now notorious cases of abuse on the part of clergy and religious. And there were horrifically abusive family situations that spouses stayed in in order to keep the family intact. And some of the men and women who were admitted to the priesthood and religious life who became abusers were people who had been abused at home or at school. They should never have been around any children or put in charge of the well-being of others. My theory is that there was more terrible stuff going on than we realize which is why people so easily fell away from the Faith at the time of the Council, and why so many were willing to embrace heresy. Physical and emotional abuse can lead to clouded judgment as well as passivity. 

From The Northern Kentucky Tribune:

If you want to read about genuine courage, about the fabric of a real champion, read The Unbreakable Child, a memoir about forgiving the unforgivable, by Kim Michele Richardson. Richardson spent the first ten years of her life in the St. Thomas/St. Vincent Orphan Asylum, in Anchorage, an hour or so from Florence. Those were harrowing years.

In her book, she describes the continual abuse and outrage shown to her, her three sisters, and others as wards in an orphanage administered by the Sisters of Charity of Nazareth, under the auspices of the Archdiocese of Louisville.

I will not repeat the kinds of daily torture-disguised-as-discipline Richardson describes in her book. I will only say it was dangerous, callous, physical, sexual, and demeaning to the human spirit. Surely, it was far from the kind of nurturing and pious perspective one finds in Bing Crosby’s Father O’Malley in Going My Way or Peggy Wood’s Mother Abbess in The Sound of Music.

Children in the St. Thomas/St. Vincent Orphan Asylum needed love and compassion. Instead, they got slaps in the face and raps on the knuckles. They were brutalized physically and sexually, and made to work in harsh and untenable conditions. They encountered mental abuse, too. All of this, in the name of things divine.

Richardson succinctly describes her experience: “I am a survivor of clergy abuse. Abandoned to a Catholic orphanage as an infant, for nearly a decade I was exposed to unspeakable abuses by Catholic nuns and a Catholic priest.”

In an ‘Afterward’ in The Unbreakable Child, attorney William F. McMurry (he represented Richardson and others) writes: “Kim’s story is a grim but consistent account of the young lives of countless Catholic children unfortunate enough to be abandoned by society. With nowhere to turn for comfort, few children would survive their childhoods without major depression, drug addiction, dementia, or imprisonment.”

Kim Michele Richardson, blessed with a survivor’s instinct and the courage imbued in her DNA, made it out of the quagmire of despair. Others never did or perhaps never will. (Read more.)

The worst form of persecution is when the innocent are tormented by those who should not only have been physically protecting them, but also guiding them to love of God. The nuns who committed such terrible crimes were evil and crazy. But I want to know why the civil authorities kept sending generations of children to live at an orphanage were there was evidence of wrongdoing. 

More about the lawsuit, HERE.


The Unbreakable Child is available, HERE.

Share

Biden Family is Being Protected by a Dual System of Government

 From Just the News:

Former President Donald Trump says President Joe Biden and his family are being protected by an unfair justice system in the United States. Trump made the comment Thursday night during a Fox News Channel town hall-style event in which he zeroed in on the content of the hard drive of a laptop owned by Biden's son, Hunter Biden.

"When you look at all of this criminality, like the laptop has so much stuff on it," Trump told host Sean Hannity. "It’s so bad. It's so evil. And yet, they don’t want to do anything."

The first son's laptop was abandoned and recovered in a Delaware repair shop and contains information about his questionable overseas business dealings, in part when his father was vice president. (Read more.)

 

Biden is starting to scare everyone: From MSN:

 The forty-sixth president was seemingly enjoying a sunny, breezy day at the Air Force Academy in Colorado. Wearing the blue Air Force hat, staring blankly at the graduates as they came up to receive their diploma, President Joe Biden looked as though he was overcome by a random though, he pivoted on stage, and went to jog to the other side of the stage, and before he could reach his destination, the forty-sixth president was down on the floor.

More troublingly, Biden couldn’t stand up again. He needed the help of two Secret Service agents and an Air Force officer. 

As cameras zoomed in to get a better angle on the fallen president—who was clearly confused and panicked as he could not stand up quickly from the fall—many of the Air Force graduates leaving the stage with their diplomas in hand were smirking.

America’s great-grandfather had fallen. He was spastically trying to stand.

With China breathing down America’s strategic throats in the Indo-Pacific in which war between the United States and China may erupt at any moment of Taiwan. During a time in which Iran is supposedly plotting more gruesome attacks on US forces still lingering in Syria and North Korea prepares for another “satellite” launch. Biden couldn’t even garner the respect of his own Air Force graduates. 

At least half the country cheered his fall while the other half is so blinded by partisanship, they’re denying the severity of the event while admonishing (and trying to cancel) anyone who dares to even bring up the president’s recent fall. But it is something that needs to be brought up. (Read more.)

Share

History of the Potato

 From Hackernoon:

Next to wheat no plant in our part of the world is of so much importance for food as the potato. Its use was not introduced into this country until toward the end of the eighteenth century. The first appearance of the potato among our people is a curious piece of history. Why should I not relate it to you? It will show you what noble efforts and perseverance are sometimes necessary to bring about the adoption, on the part of those wedded to blind routine, of the simplest, most natural idea, and one so rich in future possibilities.

The potato is native to South America; it came to us from the high plains of Colombia, Chile, and Peru. Its first appearance in Europe dates from 1565. A century and a half later the potato flourished in England. Its introduction into general use in France was slower. The first dish of potatoes, then a high-priced rarity, was served at the table of King Louis XIII in 1616.

The royal dish is to-day at the command of the poorest; but this was not effected without a good deal of trouble, as you will see. For a long time the American tuber remained in our country a simple object of curiosity to which were attributed injurious [103]properties, and which agriculture would have nothing to do with. Finally, toward the end of the eighteenth century a worthy man succeeded in overcoming these prejudices and popularized the culture of this valuable food plant. His name is Parmentier. Remember this venerated name, my friends; he who bore it banished famine by making the potato supply the deficiency of wheat.

Parmentier communicated his ideas to Louis XVI. ‘The potato,’ said he, ‘is bread already made and requiring neither miller nor baker. Take it just as it comes out of the ground and bake it in hot ashes or cook it in boiling water, and you will have a farinaceous food rivaling wheat. Poor land unfit for other crops will raise it, and it will henceforth relieve us of all fear of those terrible dearths that France has so often suffered in the past.’

Louis XVI listened to this proposal with eager attention, but the difficulty was to make others listen also. In order to interest the world of fashion in the culture of the disdained tuber the king appeared at a public festival one day with a large bouquet of potato blossoms in his hand. Curiosity was aroused at the sight of these white flowers tinged with violet and set off by the dark green of the leaves. They were talked of at court and in town; florists made imitations of them for their artificial bouquets; in ornamental gardens they were used for the borders; and as the surest way to royal favor the nobles sent [104]potatoes to their tenant farmers with orders to plant and cultivate them.

“Behold the potato fairly started on the right road!” interposed Jules. “It cannot fail to become popular now, under the protection of king and court. (Read more.)


Share

Sunday, June 4, 2023

The Three Days of Darkness Revisited

Prophecies are meant to help and inspire the faithful but can also frighten and disturb certain souls, causing scrupulosity. In that case, there are other spiritual books. There is an article on Catholic Answers circulating online about the prophecies concerning the "Three Days of Darkness." Sadly, the writer of the article is totally out of his depth. He claims the book Profezie Private does not exist but Emmett O'Regan referred to it in Unveiling the Apocalypse. And I have the word of Desmond A. Birch that it does exist because Professor Birch used it in his book Trial, Tribulation & Triumph. Now out of print, Trial, Tribulation & Triumph compiled over twenty years worth of scholarship (by this I mean old-fashioned scholarship in libraries around the world, not just googling) and if anyone can get a copy of it, it is worth reading. 
 
The aforesaid article also claims that since the Vatican website does not mention the "Three Days of Darkness" then the entire collection of prophecies do not have Church approval. What? The prophecies of the "Three Days of Darkness" come from several different mystics over the course of a thousand years or more. The Church does not have to approve every single vision of every single mystic. The visions of St. Teresa of Avila are worthy of notice although each individual vision did not necessarily run the gamut of approval. They were scrutinized as was her entire life, but each vision did not need individual approval by ecclesiastical authorities. The Church leaves some things up to the individual Catholic’s Sensus Fidelium, a sense of the Faith which the baptized possess under the guidance of the Church. Anyway, I would refer people to other more reliable sources about traditional Catholic prophecy and mysticism than the Catholic Answers article. I hope Trial, Tribulation & Triumph is reprinted someday.

I also would like to refer people to the excellent blog of my friend Elizabeth which explores the various prophecies and mystics. Those concerning the "Three Days of Darkness" are HERE.
 
 Here is an article from 2016 about the prophecy by Irish Scripture scholar Emmett O'Regan, who also wrote a wonderful book called Unveiling the Apocalypse. The "Three Days of Darkness" may well have already happened: was it the 30 years of doctrinal confusion after V2? To quote:
I have always understood the Three Days of Darkness in various private revelations to be symbolic in nature, rather than literal. It just seems to be too extreme to imagine that God would not only flout the laws of nature in such an incredible manner, but also allow innumerable souls be carried straight to hell just for peeking out the window, or nipping down to the shops at night to pick up a few tea-bags. From the very first time hearing of the prophecies of the Three Days of Darkness, I always had an impression that they were symbolic in nature. It will be worth looking over what Bl. Anna Maria Taigi had to say concerning the Three Days of Darkness before attempting an interpretation:
God will send two punishments: one will be in the form of wars, revolutions and other evils; it shall originate on earth. The other will be sent from Heaven. There shall come over the whole earth an intense darkness lasting three days and three nights. Nothing can be seen, and the air will be laden with pestilence which will claim mainly, but not only, the enemies of religion. It will be impossible to use any man-made lighting during this darkness, except blessed candles. He, who out of curiosity, opens his window to look out, or leaves his home, will fall dead on the spot. During these three days, people should remain in their homes, pray the Rosary and beg God for mercy. All the enemies of the Church, whether known or unknown, will perish over the whole earth during that universal darkness, with the exception of a few whom God will soon convert. The air shall be infected by demons who will appear under all sorts of hideous forms. (Blessed Anna Maria Taigi, Private Prophecies, Rome, 1863)
(Read more.)

I wonder if symbolically the message is telling people to stay close to the sacraments (since beeswax candles are used at baptism) and staying inside the house, which is the Church, and not becoming involved in false religions. Symbolism does not mean it is not real. In the past 50 years all hell has been flung at the Church. From Emmett O'Regan:

I know that a symbolic interpretation of the Three Days of Darkness isn't going to prove popular with some people (especially the beeswax candle industry), but here goes my take on this particular subject anyway...The home that we are urged not to leave during this time of darkness represents the Church itself. Outside of the Church there is no salvation, only a looming darkness which threatens to drag us away into hell. The darkness is the Great Apostasy prophesied throughout the New Testament, when driven by their own selfish egos, baptised Christians would leave the sanctuary and light of the Church, and venture out into the blinkered darkness of secular atheism....(Read more.)

Share