Meanwhile, the Catholic Church enjoys less esteem in Los Angeles—a city named by Catholic missionaries in honor of the Virgin Mary,
“Lady of the Angels”—than a gaggle of gay men styling themselves “The
Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence,” who dress up as nuns, observe Easter
by holding X-rated “Hunky Jesus” and “Foxy Mary” beauty contests, and
who make their acidic contempt for Catholicism crystal clear.
If the “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence” had shown their
mascara-drenched faces at Ebbets Field at the start of Vin’s long stint
in the broadcast booth in Brooklyn, the only question is who would have
ejected them first: the largely Irish cops, the predominantly Italian
and Irish fans, or players from both benches. Today, the furor arose
when the Dodgers temporarily rescinded the award scheduled to be
presented to the “Sisters” at “Pride Night,” a relatively recent
addition to baseball’s calendar, but now observed by every MLB team
except the Texas Rangers.
The Los Angeles Times even speculated that the Dodgers might lose their ace pitcher,
Clayton Kershaw, an evangelical Christian, because he publicly
criticized the team’s decision. Kershaw’s courage stood in contrast to
the actions of many on the Catholic left, who praised the “Sisters” and
reserved their vitriol for the American bishops who had criticized them.
Sister Jeannine Gramick, a long-time dissenter from Catholic teaching, opined that
“the choice of clothing, even if offensive to some, can never trump the
works of mercy.” One doubts that Sister Gramick would be as indulgent
of men who enjoy wearing the flowing robes of the Ku Klux Klan or the
Hugo Boss-made uniforms of the SS, no matter how many soup kitchens they
ran.
The constant celebration of all things LGBTQIA may be reaching its
peak, though. The reason that Americans generally made peace with gay
marriage and have not strongly objected to “Pride Month” as is quickly
becoming, borrowing a phrase from Sam Francis, “the month otherwise
known as June,” is that most Americans became persuaded that sexual
orientation is not chosen. Given the traditional American belief that
life is much easier with a partner and the modern belief that life
without sex is almost unthinkable, greater rights for gay couples were
inevitable. If such rights had been secured by appeals to tolerance and
privacy and expressed in legislation that provided for nonsexual unions
as well as sexual ones, it is possible that the madhouse of Drag Queen
Story Hour, the 37 genders, and the lionizing of anti-Catholic
fetishists could have been avoided.
We are where we are because activists made their successful case for
gay marriage by appeals to unfettered personal autonomy and absolute
equality. If those are your guiding principles, our current destination
is inevitable, as is the legalization of pedophilia. The only way out is
by recognizing that the one thing that can be said with certainty in
this area is that gay unions are in no way equal to real marriage.
If you doubt me, try this thought experiment. The habitable world is
reduced to two desert islands. One island is given to 100 married
couples; the other is divided in two, with one half going to 50 gay
couples and one half going to 50 lesbian couples. A century later, which
island will be a cemetery, and which a growing human habitation? (Read more.)