For much of the past 500 years, to the extent that anyone bothered
to think or talk about women and the Reformation, the assumption was that since
the Reformation improved everyone’s lives, then women’s lives were made far
better as well. Luther and other Reformers had profound, deep, and
violence-inducing differences, but since they all seemed to prioritize the
“freedom of the Christian” in opposition to the rules-and-works mentality of
the prison of medieval Catholicism, that must mean that everyone was better off
(because they were more “free”) after 1517—and “everyone” includes women, does
it not? No longer forced into convents against their will, no longer told that
marriage was an inferior state, and now encouraged to read the Bible in their
own languages, the lot of the post-Reformation woman must have been an improvement over what her grandmothers had
suffered.
The first problem we run up against in this scenario is the
Reformers’ definition of “Christian freedom” and our contemporary
understanding of their understanding. Whether their understanding was an
accurate, truly biblically-based one is a matter for theologians. Whether their
sense of it was anything even close to what we think “freedom” is, even
interior freedom, is doubtful: ask Anabaptist Felix Manz, executed by drowning
for his beliefs by order of the Reform-controlled Zurich council in 1527,
barely a decade after the movement began and just a few years after Luther
published his On the Freedom of the Christian.
Setting that aside, we can turn to the question of women’s actual
lives. The impact of the Protestant Reformation on women was profound. In some
senses nothing changed: nothing Luther or the other reformers said questioned
basic, traditional, medieval Catholic assumptions about human anthropology or
the roles of men and women in marriage. What did change was something else, but
something quite simple, and with profound implications: Luther and the other
Reformers went to war against the evangelical counsels as ideals, and especially
as the core of a vowed way of life. This type of life and spirituality was no
longer an ideal; marriage and domesticity—might we call it the domestic church?—was.
The Reformation was, of course, a diverse and constantly evolving
phenomenon. Common to the entire movement, however, was this conviction that
vowed, celibate religious life as an ideal was non-scriptural, unnatural,
harmful, led to sin and hypocrisy, and must be eliminated, supplanted by
another model of ideal Christian life: the individual, saved by faith alone,
dwelling productively in the community as believer, spouse, and parent.
The strongest symbol of this non-biblical ideal of virginity was
of course, the monastery, so in Reformed lands the closing of male and female
religious houses was a top priority, and the Gospel of domesticity was preached
and enforced in their stead. Every woman, it was assumed, was meant for
marriage, children, and homemaking. Gone was that space—as the convent was—for
women to pursue intellectual and artistic pursuits, to provide
institutionalized charity, to interact with religious, political, and business
interests as leaders of their communities, and—very importantly—to support the
community and serve the living and the dead through their once highly valued,
now “useless” prayers.
And so, a survey of the large and continually growing body of
research reveals wide agreement that is, in fact, 180 degrees away from the
former view of the Reformation’s impact on women as beneficial. “The down side
of the peculiarly Protestant ‘good news’ to women,”
Lutheran historian Kirsi Stjerna notes, “was the exclusiveness of marriage as the basis for the
holy vocation. No other options received a theological blessing. Thus,
Reformation theology, generally speaking, enforced the domestication of women. …
The domestication of women to the honorable callings of motherhood and
marriage, advocated through theological argument, knitted with the Protestants’
valorization of family and marriage as the cornerstones of society, on the one
hand, and their reiteration of the Pauline rejection of women teachers and
ministers, on the other.”
In other words, what we are left with in Reformation-dominated
lands is a vision of a holy society in which worship is centered on preaching
from a literally-interpreted Bible, from which female saints have disappeared,
and in which women might no longer envision or live out their spiritual lives
in ways unrelated to earthly marriage and family life. They must be
connected to a human male in a legal, familial way in order to have social
legitimacy, human worth, and a role in the spiritual landscape. (Read more.)