Louis XVI was very much a part of the Catholic Enlightenment, with his reforms and his promotion of the sciences. From
The Imaginative Conservative (via
Stephanie Mann):
The sum of Dr. Lehner’s argument is
this: contrary to popular and secular mythologies, the Church possessed a
number of critical personalities and intellectual leaders who actively
engaged the ideas of democracy, individualism, liberalism (properly
understood), and what would be called, ultimately, modernity. All of
this happened between the Council of Trent and the end of the French
Revolution. Surprisingly, at least to me, Catholic scholars and
theologians considered, studied, and digested the importance of the
thought of John Locke, Immanuel Kant, and even Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
Indeed, they not only took the ideas of non-Catholic scholars seriously,
they actually attempted to meld secular thought with Catholic theology.
Dr. Lehner, much to his credit, never over-makes his case. He
recognizes that there were many, many “Enlightenments” during the few
centuries leading up to the French Revolution, just as our own John
Willson stresses the need to acknowledge many “Foundings” in the
American Founding period. Additionally, Dr. Lehner never claims that
these Catholic Enlighteners—as he calls them—dominated scholarship or
the thinking of the Church as a whole. Rather, he notes, time and time
again throughout his book, they attracted attention, bonded with one
another, and changed, shaped, and delimited the philosophical and
theological discussion within the Church.
It is best to allow Dr. Lehner to explain this himself:
What was on the agenda of Catholic
Enlighteners? Their aim was (a) to use the newest achievement of
philosophy and science to defend the essential dogmas of Catholic
Christianity by explaining them in the new language, and (b) to
reconcile Catholicism with modern culture. If anything held these
diverse thinkers together, it was their belief that Catholicism had to
modernize if it wanted to be a viable intellectual alternative to the
persuasive arguments of the anti-clerical Enlighteners. Catholic
Enlighteners differed among themselves as to how such a modernization
should be brought about, but all agreed that Aristotelian scholasticism
could not longer serve as the universal foundation for theology.
(Read more.)
Share
No comments:
Post a Comment