From Eric Sammons at Crisis:
It’s easy to criticize the plan, and it’s easy to lay blame.
It’s also tempting to play “What If?” What if the Spirit of Vatican II
were a spirit of faithfulness and orthodoxy, rather than a spirit of
chaos and destruction? What if bishops and popes had acted quickly and
decisively to stop priestly abuse? What if the liturgical reforms that
followed Vatican II actually followed Vatican II?
These are all interesting questions,
but we live in the here and now. We can’t go back and change the
past—millions of Catholics have left the Church, we’ve lost tens of
thousands of religious vocations, and the Church’s moral standing in the
world is in tatters. Decline is a reality we can’t avoid.
Another temptation is to propose
simple solutions to this problem. “Let’s start a new diocese-wide
evangelization program!” “We need to return every parish to the
traditional Latin Mass!” “Bishops need to stop supporting liberal
politicians!” While these ideas might have value, here’s the grim
reality: No matter what we do, the Church will continue to decline in
the coming years, barring some divine intervention (which we hope and
pray for, but cannot presume). (Read more.)
Also from Crisis:
For years now, ordinary Catholics have been barraged with a number of trendy buzzwords and catchy slogans:
“A listening Church,” “accompaniment,” “pastoral,” and more. While
these words are not necessarily wrong or inappropriate for ecclesial
discourse, they often serve as a Trojan horse through which heterodoxy
and heteropraxy emerge.
As preparation for the “Synod on Synodality” begins, news regarding the extension
of the German Church’s “Synodal Way” into 2023 has ensured that such
ordinary Catholics will continue to hear the word “synodality” for the
unforeseeable future. In his opening remarks
for the synod’s preparatory phase, Pope Francis said, “There is no need
to create another church, but to create a different church.” Of course,
one wonders where the distinction between the two lies. And
furthermore, how can an ordinary, right-believing Catholic survive this
era of “synodality”? (Read more.)
From Real Clear Religion:
Continuing his pivot from ancient sources to modern times, Benedict
argued that the connection between natural law and justice was
well-understood by many Enlightenment thinkers and reflected in
documents like the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Produced partly in reaction to the horrors unleashed by National
Socialism, this text was composed by individuals ranging from a secular
French Jew, René Cassin, to the Lebanese Greek Orthodox diplomat,
Charles Malik.
The expression “natural law” appears nowhere in the 1948 Declaration.
Some of its articles are more evocative of mid-twentieth-century social
democracy than Aquinas. Yet the text’s reference to the “inherent
dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the
human family” and its claim that all humans are “born free and equal in
dignity and rights” and “endowed with reason and conscience” imitate the
language of natural law, albeit one tinged with Enlightenment emphases.
The fact, however, that the Declaration was drafted and endorsed by
believers and non-believers itself illustrated that some principles are
recognizable by all humans as true.
But this confidence in reason’s ability to know truth, Benedict went
on, was now in question. The twentieth century’s second half, he said,
had witnessed the triumph of “a positivist understanding of nature”
throughout the West.
By “positivist,” the pope meant the idea that reason can only know
scientific and social facts. Philosophy and religion were subsequently
demoted to the sphere of the subjective. The West had consequently
cordoned itself off from “the classical sources of knowledge for ethics
and law”—and trapped itself in what Benedict called “a concrete bunker
with no windows, in which we ourselves provide lighting and atmospheric
conditions, being no longer willing to obtain either from God’s wide
world.”
How then do we escape this self-imposed prison? “How,” Benedict
asked, “do we find our way out into the wide world, into the big
picture? How can reason rediscover its true greatness, without being
sidetracked into irrationality?” (Read more.)
Share