skip to main |
skip to sidebar
From
Reid's Reader:
Recently,
I came across the following quotations from the philosopher and cultural critic
Hannah Arendt. They appeared in her essay “The Crisis in Culture”, first published in 1961 in her collection of
essays Between Past and Future. At
this point in her essay, Arendt was distinguishing between “culture” (basically
great and challenging works which have come to us from the past) and
“entertainment” (what is ephemeral, undemanding and basically intended to fill
up our spare time).
She
wrote: “those who produce for the mass
media ransack the entire range of past and present culture in the hope of
finding suitable material. This material, moreover, cannot be offered as it is;
it must be altered in order to become entertaining; it must be prepared to
be easily consumed.”
Of
real works of art, she goes on to say: “their
nature is affected when these objects themselves are changed – rewritten,
condensed, reduced to kitsch in reproduction, or in preparation for the movies.
This does not mean that culture is
spread to the masses, but that culture is being destroyed in order to yield
entertainment. The result of this
is not disintegration but decay, and those who promote it are not the Tin Pan
Alley composers but a special kind of intellectual, often well read and
well informed, whose sole function is to organise, disseminate, and change
cultural objects in order to persuade the masses that Hamlet can be as
entertaining as My Fair Lady, and perhaps as educational as well. There
are many great authors of the past who have survived centuries of oblivion and
neglect, but it is still an open question whether they will survive an entertaining
version of what they have to say.” [Underlinings added for
emphasis.]
Of
course, after most of 60 years, there are some things here that now sound a
little dated. Perhaps we could substitute something like Mamma Mia! for My Fair Lady
and we might say “the music industry” rather than “Tin Pan Alley”, a phrase which means little nowadays. We might
remark that it would be television and the internet rather than “the movies” which now do most of this
cultural simplification, although the movies are still part of the process. If
we read only these quotations, we might also think that Arendt is
attacking pop culture and the mass media per
se, and in therefore (to use the easy insult word) an “elitist”. In
fact
she isn’t. The essay as a whole makes it clear that she understands the
legitimate functions of the mass media and also the necessity for
“entertainment”. Then we might consider how, over the past half century,
television and film have been more readily recognised as media capable
of rising to the status of real art. (Read more.)
Share
No comments:
Post a Comment