From Ruth Wise writing for the
WSJ:
Assaults on intellectual and political
freedom have been making headlines. Pressure from faculty egged on by
Muslim groups induced Brandeis University last month not to grant Ayaan
Hirsi Ali,
the proponent of women's rights under Islam, an intended honorary
degree at its convocation. This was a replay of 1994, when Brandeis
faculty demanded that trustees rescind their decision to award an
honorary degree to
Jeane Kirkpatrick,
former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. In each case, a
faculty cabal joined by (let us charitably say) ignorant students
promoted the value of repression over the values of America's liberal
democracy.
Opponents of free speech have lately chalked up many such victories: New York City Police Commissioner
Raymond Kelly
prevented from speaking at Brown University in November; a lecture by
Charles Murray
canceled by Azusa Pacific University in April;
Condoleezza Rice,
former secretary of state and national-security adviser under the
George W. Bush
administration, harassed earlier this month into declining the
invitation by Rutgers University to address this year's convocation.
Most
painful to me was the Harvard scene several years ago when the
Committee on Degrees in Social Studies, celebrating its 50th
anniversary, accepted a donation in honor of its former head tutor
Martin Peretz,
whose contributions to the university include the chair in
Yiddish I have been privileged to hold. His enemies on campus generated a
"party against Marty" that forced him to walk a gauntlet of jeering
students for having allegedly offended Islam, while putting others on
notice that they had best not be perceived guilty of association with
him.
Universities have not only failed
to stand up to those who limit debate, they have played a part in
encouraging them. The modish commitment to so-called diversity replaces
the ideal of guaranteed equal treatment of individuals with guaranteed
group preferences in hiring and curricular offerings.
Females and members of visible
minorities are given handicaps (as in golf). Courses are devised to
inculcate in students the core lesson that (in the words of one recent
graduate, writing online at the Huffington Post) "harmful structural
inequalities persist on the basis of class, race, sex, sexual
orientation, and gender identity in the U.S." On too many campuses, as
in a funhouse mirror, ideological commitment to diversity has brought
about its opposite: ideological hegemony, which is much more harmful to
the life of the mind than the alleged structural inequalities that
social engineering set out to correct. (Read more.)
Some commentary from
Bloomberg View,
HERE.
Share
1 comment:
There is no longer any conversation, there is no longer any debate..it now is, believe as I do or you are an ignorant lout.
Post a Comment