A fascinating article on Merkel, with a reference to my cousin John Laughland. From
American Thinker:
In
the mainstream media, the policies of the German prime minister, Angela
Merkel, are often portrayed as a form of atonement for Germany’s past
sins of imperialism and genocide. Letting in a million refugees is
supposedly the absolute negation of the Holocaust, and pressing for
further European cooperation is seen as the opposite of Germany’s old
attempts to violently bring the rest of Europe under its control. And
for these very reasons, progressive politicians and intellectuals around
the world are now looking up to Merkel as the defender of pluralistic
Western values.
At
first sight, this praise for Merkel doesn’t seem so far-fetched, even
for conservatives who fundamentally oppose her policies. After all, she
is acting out of genuine goodwill and charity towards the downtrodden of
the Middle East, isn’t she? And we may disagree about the feasibility
and consequences of further European integration, but given Europe’s
bloody past it seems perfectly understandable that Germany’s prime
minister is calling for more harmony among European nations.
Nonetheless,
it is important to point out that the popular image both of Angela
Merkel and of modern Germany is deeply flawed. Because far from
representing a negation -- or a misguided attempt at negation -- of past
German policies and attitudes, the modern German mentality is in many
ways a mutation or an update of the same mentality that has guided
Germany since the eighteenth century, and especially since the
unification of the country in 1870.
Let
us begin with the more obvious parallel: German support for further
European integration. Despite all the German talk about subordinating
narrow national interests to the European project, careful observers
must have noticed the coincidence that the Germans always see themselves
as the leaders of this disinterested project, and that the measures
deemed to be necessary for further European cooperation always seem to
be German-made.
Are
the Germans really such idealistic supporters of the European project?
It is more probable that in reality they see the European Union as an
ideal instrument to control the rest of Europe. Indeed, in 1997 the
British author John Laughland wrote a book about this subject, The Tainted Source: the Undemocratic Origins of the European Idea,
which is still worth reading for anyone who wants understand what kind
of organization the EU actually is. According to Laughland, the Germans
are such big supporters of the European ideal because they know that all
important decisions in a confederation of states can ultimately only be
taken by or with the approval of the most important state -- in this
case, Germany. (Read more.)
Share
No comments:
Post a Comment