Thursday, March 9, 2017

Hitler Was a Socialist

From Louder with Crowder:
A favorite tactic employed by leftists is to describe the Nazis as “right wing,” with Adolf Hitler, their leader, as the grand leader of this “right wing” movement. Rewriting history is pretty common for leftists, as their history is littered with injustice (the KKK was founded by Democrats, did you know?). Injustices they claim to fight against today. Awkward.

But thanks to this nifty thing called “history” in combination with “the internet,” we can bust this myth once and for all. Thoroughly. Or until a leftist insists on ignoring it. Then we’ll hold them down and tape their eyes open. Just kidding, that’s only what a leftist would do. For those who’d rather watch this column in video form, there’s one below. For those who prefer reading, yuck. But scroll down.

Adolf Hitler wasn’t “right wing.” If you take nothing else from this post, just remember Hitler was a socialist. With terrible facial hair. There’s an easy way to remember it, too. NAZI stands for National Socialist German Workers‘ Party. Associate it with blunt mustaches.

What does National Socialist German Worker’s Party mean? Glad you asked. Is it different from “Democratic socialism”? Only in semantics. A Democracy is mob rule, which is why America is actually a constitutional, representative republic, NOT a democracy. A representative republic protects the minority from the majority, whereas a democracy is the rule of the majority. Leftists get caught up in words, getting tripped up over “National Socialism” as opposed to “Democrat Socialism.” But it’s just that. Semantics. So when Hitler ginned up hatred for the Jews, he could get the mob to agree with him. He could get the mob to believe him. There were no representatives to stop Hitler. He was one man helming the desperation of a majority of people. Spot the difference? (Read more.)
Share

1 comment:

julygirl said...

Mob rule seems to be the current trend in attempting to influence legislation. Funny how these groups appear to fall into the same demographic cluster as they did when they were in their 20's raising hell against the establishment during the 60's and 70's. They grew up in a climate of spoiled entitlement doled out by parents who had to grow up quickly serving this country in WWII, and wanted to protect their children from any pain. They instead created a vast number of left wing radicals intent of destroying social mores by 'throwing the baby out with the bath water'. They want their way and do not want to engage in any sort of discourse. Their way is tied into who they are rather than what they think, therefore they must protect it bodily rather than intellectually.