skip to main |
skip to sidebar
From
The American Vision:
The Virginia Democrat Governor Ralph Northam supported a law that
would allow a woman to kill her unborn baby up until his or her (not
“its”) birth and thereafter if the result of that birth did not meet the
personhood guidelines of the mother. The Virginia government is now dominated by pro-abortion Democrats.
They are good with snuffing out the most innocent of life. At the same
time, they are passing laws that will leave the rest of Virginians
defenseless from people who are hell-bent on killing people no matter
what the law says.
Leftists have been trying to defend the third-trimester abortion laws
as a woman’s fundamental right. The claim is being made that such
abortions should be permitted if (1) the mother’s physical life is in
danger, (2) the unborn baby has some physical abnormality, (3) the
mother’s “mental health” is in jeopardy.
Considering number 1: There is almost no example of a woman’s
physical health being in danger that would necessitate killing the
unborn baby. The goal of the doctor and his or her medical staff should
do everything to save both mother and child. A doctor should not kill
one to save the other. Jeff and Candi Durbin’s daughter went through a
difficult delivery. She needed a blood transfusion and the baby was not
breathing. What did the doctors do? They did everything to save both of
them, and they did.
Considering number 2: Where is the line drawn on physical
abnormality? What if a debilitating physical abnormality occurs well
after a child’s birth? Should parents have the right to kill the child?
Will DNA testing of an unborn baby be used to determine if there is some
physical or mental abnormality that could be used to permit a late-term
abortion. Think of the film Gattaca. James Jordan writes:
Your name is Vincent [to conquer] Freeman [free from the
genetic engineering of the State], [an invalid as determined by the
State] and you are a God-child. The prophets of genetics say that you
have a 99% probability of developing a heart condition, and so there is
no way you’re ever going to be admitted to the space program. You’ll
never go to heaven…. Religiously, the film begins with a quotation from
Ecclesiastes [7:13] [“Consider what God has done. Who can straighten out
what he made crooked?”] and asks the question whether the human spirit
is encoded on genes or comes from something higher. The religious
elements are in the background, yet they serve to fix the themes of the
film. Vincent’s mother clutches a rosary, cross visibly displayed, as
she gives birth to her “faith-child.” The symbol on the identity cards
of the designer people is an infinity symbol, but on the cards of the
normal people is a cross. When Vincent is accepted to go to Saturn,
Jerome [genome] exclaims pregnantly: “They’re sending you up there, for
Christ’s sake! You! Of all people!”
The spiral stairway in Jerome Morrow’s (played by Jude Law) house is formed as a double-helix model of DNA. One reviewer considered genetic engineering a positive: “With genetic
engineering, we could get rid of unwanted traits, such as baldness,
obesity, and even genetic diseases.” We could also get rid of the
children who have “unwanted traits” once they are born so they could not
pass them on. It’s called eugenics (good genes). Who ultimately makes
the determination? (Read more.)
Share
No comments:
Post a Comment