skip to main |
skip to sidebar
From
Dr. Gorka:
What evidence did the intelligence community have to rely on to initiate such investigations? According to the New York Times,
the FBI launched a counterintelligence investigation based on the
“dossier” compiled by former British MI6 operative, Christopher Steele.
The details of this dossier were never fully vetted by the intelligence
community and were accepted at face-value by most of the leaders of the
Obama-era intelligence community. The Steele dossier asserted that
Russian intelligence had compromising materials on Donald Trump that
were of an embarrassing sexual nature. It concluded that the Russians
were using this compromising material–kompromat—to blackmail Trump into being an agent of influence.
Yet, never once did the U.S. intelligence services independently verify these claims. And, for the record, the memo was commissioned
by Trump’s Republican primary opponents in 2016. It was then
disseminated to the office of virulent “Never-Trumper,” the now-deceased
Senator John McCain (R-AZ), who, in turn, passed the dossier onto the
James Comey-led FBI. In effect, the dossier was the poisoned source from
which so many investigators used to justify investigating Donald J.
Trump.
For his part, Christopher Steele had become a noted anti-Trump zealot–even offering
to come on and work directly for the FBI after the Republican primary
ended in a Trump victory. Steele’s British nationality should not be
overlooked, either. An international thread has run throughout the murky
Russian collusion-delusion “investigation” since its inception. Not
only was former MI6 operative, Steele, involved, but, so too was an
Australian diplomat, Alexander Downer. (Read more.)
Share
No comments:
Post a Comment