skip to main |
skip to sidebar
From Scott Richert at
Chronicles:
As the shock of the Paris attacks died
down, many reasonable and well-intentioned Christians followed in the
steps of less reasonable and less well-intentioned secularists,
declaring that it would be a mistake to lay responsibility for such acts
of terrorism at the feet of all Muslims (a self-evidently true
statement) or on Islam itself (far from self-evidently true). An
ordained Christian minister whom I have known for years rightly pointed
out that those who refuse to believe individual Muslims when they say
that they do not support violent jihad are effectively calling
them “liars or mere stooges.” Yet he and others who keep repeating that
“ISIS doesn’t represent all of Islam” (a self-evidently true statement)
all too often gently slide into implying something more: that ISIS is,
in some essential way, not truly Islamic (far from self-evidently true).
The leaders of the Islamic State, needless to say, disagree with these
well-meaning Christians. Here is how the former describe the jihadists
of Paris:
This group of believers were youth who divorced the worldly life and
advanced towards their enemy hoping to be killed for Allah’s sake, doing
so in support of His religion, His Prophet (blessing and peace be upon
him), and His allies. They did so in spite of His enemies. Thus, they
were truthful with Allah—we consider them so—and Allah granted victory
upon their hands and cast terror into the hearts of the crusaders in
their very own homeland.
Those who do not take representatives of the Islamic State at their
word when they claim that they are acting on behalf of Islam and in
accordance with Islamic principles are calling them “liars” as well. At
best, they are judging these Muslims’ self-understanding of their
religion in the same way that the teenaged atheist does when he says to a
Catholic or a Lutheran, “If you were really a Christian, you would . . .
” The problem becomes even worse when they refuse to believe seemingly
nonradical Muslims who, say, express a desire to see sharia
imposed in Western countries or are reluctant to condemn acts of terror
committed by other Muslims because, as the president of the Muslim
Association of Greater Rockford once told Aaron Wolf and me, Islam is a
pendulum that can “swing to the extremes and come back to the middle,
but you are still within the boundaries” of Islam, and thus “You can
believe someone is a terrorist, and I don’t.” Claiming that a man who
freely volunteers such statements “doesn’t really mean it” or “doesn’t
understand what he is saying” isn’t giving him the benefit of the doubt;
it is calling him either stupid or a liar. (Read more.)
Share
No comments:
Post a Comment