Wednesday, October 4, 2017

Things That Just Don’t Add Up

From Natural News:
Although law enforcement says there was only one shooter, multiple witnesses are openly reporting the presence of multiple shooters. This could reasonably be the result of confusion and chaos, but it’s also highly suspicious that the shooter had “full auto” weapon which is usually limited to law enforcement or military personnel. This question about multiple shooters was also raised after the Aurora, Colorado “Batman movie theater” shooting, in which numerous witnesses reported the presence of multiple shooters. If this shooting was carried out by multiple shooters, it would obviously indicate planning and coordination among a group of people who sought to carry out the shooting for a political purpose of some kind. (Read more.)

1 comment:

julygirl said...

His hotel room was so filled with smoke from the firing of multiple rounds that it set off the smoke alarm. So, yes, one shooter could have wreaked this violence. And on another note, banning guns would not have stopped this shooter if one looks a the facts. Unless there is a world wide ban on the production of firearms someone intent on shooting will find a way. In fact, many of these mass shootings would have been stopped if someone else had had a gun. This particular venue was the first one in which the shooter could not have been immediately shot down by someone else.