Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Dealing with Rejection As a Writer

Some wise words from Fiction Factor:
Despite beliefs to the contrary, editors are people. They breathe real air and work at real jobs. They go home to real homes and have real families (sometimes). They have bosses to answer to and they must fulfill job descriptions, like anyone else.

An editor’s job is to purchase manuscripts (be they novels, short stories or articles) for the publishing house who pays the checks on pay day. In order for that editor to keep receiving pay checks, the publishing house must continue to sell enough books (or magazines) to enough readers to guarantee the running costs will be covered for another week.

If the editor purchases manuscripts that do NOT return sufficient profit for the publishing house to remain in business, then everyone loses. The author’s work is STILL rejected, the editor loses his or her job, and thousands of related workers will also join unemployment cues once the publishing house files for bankruptcy and closes its doors.

Now that we all understand that trivial fact, let’s ask the following question:
Why do so many writers feel the need to exact a bloody, dire revenge on an editor who is simply doing his or her job?

Whilst researching for this article, I visited some “Coping with Rejection” sites. One of these sites offers a place for rejected authors to vent their frustration and anger at hapless editors.

On one forum, I happened across the angry rantings of a rejected writer, determined to let the world know that he thought all publishers and all agents were only out to find out ‘how much money that writer can make for [them] anyway.”

I’d like to know who told that unhappy Rejected Author that the industry was ever any different! Let’s be honest. If your book is not popularly liked by the masses (your readers!) then no copies are going to sell. If no copies sell, then the publisher has lost money. The editor has lost money. The bookstore has lost money. The author has lost money – oh wait – the author has to pay back any money that wasn’t covered by sales…

Honestly, the publishing industry is a money and sales oriented business – just like any other. Why try to internalize something that is simply about how many books are going to sell of how many shelves on any day? (Read more.)


Hans Georg Lundahl said...

Here is a person who pretended to want to help me:

Une femme prétendait me vouloir aider ....

In correspondence with me, of course.

If you look at links, you will also find the series of posts includes: Avec Albin Michel, éditeurs, sur la possibilité de publier mes blogs en livres.

If you skim or carefully read through both, you will find a common theme is "editors CAN'T take submissions via bloglinks".

Now, this was NOT about what content would sell or not, this was about a method of submitting, which is:

a) advantageous to an author who, like me, has no drawers or even decent computer programs to use for making pdfs;
b) advantageous to poorer newbie editors who maybe need to test fifteen copies of a booklet of essays of mine before daring to go further.

Is that the problem? The big guys don't want competitions from small upstarts?

Hans Georg Lundahl said...

And MANY thanks for all tips for writers about self-publishing, BUT the method I have in mind, which suits both my ideals and my situation better, is not quite the same.

Would you mind making that come a bit closer to the forefront?

Note on further use conditions
(by short link)