It was banned in England, too, under Cromwell. From History:
After the Puritans in England overthrew King Charles I in 1647, among
their first items of business after chopping off the monarch’s head was
to ban Christmas. Parliament decreed that December 25 should instead be
a day of “fasting and humiliation” for Englishmen to account for their
sins. The Puritans of New England eventually followed the lead of those
in old England, and in 1659 the General Court of the Massachusetts Bay
Colony made it a criminal offense to publicly celebrate the holiday and
declared that “whosoever shall be found observing any such day as
Christmas or the like, either by forbearing of labor, feasting, or any
other way” was subject to a 5-shilling fine.
Why did the Puritans loathe Christmas? Stephen Nissenbaum, author of The Battle for Christmas, says it was partly because of theology and partly because of the rowdy celebrations that marked the holiday in the 1600s. n their strict interpretation of the Bible, the Puritans noted that
there was no scriptural basis for commemorating Christmas. “The Puritans
tried to run a society in which legislation would not violate anything
that the Bible said, and nowhere in the Bible is there a mention of
celebrating the Nativity,” Nissenbaum says. The Puritans noted that
scriptures did not mention a season, let alone a single day, that marked
the birth of Jesus.
Even worse for the Puritans were the pagan roots of Christmas. Not until
the fourth century A.D. did the church in Rome ordain the celebration
of the Nativity on December 25, and that was done by co-opting existing
pagan celebrations such as Saturnalia,
an ancient Roman holiday of lights marked with drinking and feasting
that coincided with the winter solstice. The noted Puritan minister
Increase Mather wrote that Christmas occurred on December 25 not because
“Christ was born in that month, but because the heathens’ Saturnalia
was at that time kept in Rome, and they were willing to have those pagan
holidays metamorphosed into Christian [ones].” According to Nissenbaum,
“Puritans believed Christmas was basically just a pagan custom that the
Catholics took over without any biblical basis for it. The holiday had
everything to do with the time of year, the solstice and Saturnalia and
nothing to do with Christianity.” (Read more.)
Cromwell and Christmas, HERE.
Here is a defense of the traditional date of Christmas:
The Catholic Church, from at least the second century, has claimed
that Christ was born on December 25. However, it is commonly alleged
that our Lord Jesus Christ was not born on December 25. For the sake of
simplicity, let us set out the usual objections to the date of December
25 and counter each of them.
Objection 1: December
25 was chosen in order to replace the pagan Roman festival of
Saturnalia. Saturnalia was a popular winter festival and so the Catholic
Church prudently substituted Christmas in its place.
Reply to Objection 1: Saturnalia
commemorated the winter solstice. Yet the winter solstice falls on
December 22. It is true that Saturnalia celebrations began as early as
December 17 and extended till December 23. Still, the dates don’t match
up.
Objection 2: December 25 was chosen to replace the pagan Roman holiday Natalis Solis Invicti which means “Birthday of the Unconquered Sun.”
Reply to Objection 2: Let us examine first the cult of the Unconquered Sun. The Emperor Aurelian introduced the cult of the Sol Invictus or Unconquered Sunto Rome in A.D. 274. Aurelian found political traction with this cult, because his own name Aurelianderives from the Latin word aurora denoting “sunrise.” Coins reveal that Emperor Aurelian called himself the Pontifex Solis or Pontiff of the Sun. Thus, Aurelian simply accommodated a generic solar cult and identified his name with it at the end of the third century.
Most importantly, there is no historical record for a celebration
Natalis Sol Invictus on
December 25 prior to A.D. 354. Within an illuminated manuscript for the
year A.D. 354, there is an entry for December 25 reading “N INVICTI CM
XXX.” Here N means “nativity.” INVICTI means “of the Unconquered.” CM
signifies “circenses missus” or “games ordered.” The Roman numeral XXX
equals thirty. Thus, the inscription means that thirty games were order
for the nativity of the Unconquered for December 25th. Note that the
word “sun” is not present. Moreover, the very same codex also lists
“natus Christus in Betleem Iudeae” for the day of December 25. The
phrase is translated as “birth of Christ in Bethlehem of Judea.”
[i]
The
date of December 25th only became the “Birthday of the Unconquered Sun”
under the Emperor Julian the Apostate. Julian the Apostate had been a
Christian but who had apostatized and returned to Roman paganism.
History reveals that it was the hateful former Christian Emperor that
erected a pagan holiday on December 25. Think about that for a moment.
What was he trying to replace?
These
historical facts reveal that the Unconquered Sun was not likely a
popular deity in the Roman Empire. The Roman people did not need to be
weaned off of a so-called ancient holiday. Moreover, the tradition of a
December 25th celebration does not find a place on the Roman calendar until after the Christianization of Rome.
The “Birthday of the Unconquered Sun” holiday was scarcely traditional
and hardly popular. Saturnalia (mentioned above) was much more popular,
traditional, and fun. It seems, rather, that Julian the Apostate had
attempted to introduce a pagan holiday in order to replace the Christian
one! (Read more.)
Share