Friday, April 18, 2025

Good Friday


From Daniel Mitsui.

The Reproaches (Improperia)
I.
1 and 2: My people, what have I done to you
How have I offended you? Answer me!
1: I led you out of Egypt,
from slavery to freedom,
but you led your Savior to the cross.
2: My people, what have I done to you?
How have I offended you? Answer me!

1: Holy is God!
2: Holy and strong!
1: Holy immortal One, have mercy on us!
1 and 2: For forty years I led you
safely through the desert.
I fed you with manna from heaven,
and brought you to a land of plenty; but you led your Savior to the cross.
Repeat "Holy is God..."
1 and 2: What more could I have done for you.
I planted you as my fairest vine,
but you yielded only bitterness:
when I was thirsty you gave me vinegar to drink,
and you pierced your Savior with a lance.
Repeat "Holy is God..." 
II.
1: For your sake I scourged your captors
and their firstborn sons,
but you brought your scourges down on me.
(Repeated throughout by Choir 2)
2: My people, what have I done to you?
How have I offended you? Answer me!
1: I led you from slavery to freedom
and drowned your captors in the sea,
but you handed me over to your high priests.
2: "My people...."
1: I opened the sea before you,
but you opened my side with a spear.
2: "My people...."
1: I led you on your way in a pillar of cloud,
but you led me to Pilate's court.
2: "My people...."
1: I bore you up with manna in the desert,
but you struck me down and scourged me.
2: "My people...."
1: I gave you saving water from the rock,
but you gave me gall and vinegar to drink.
2: "My people...."
1: For you I struck down the kings of Canaan.
but you struck my head with a reed.
2: "My people...."
1: I gave you a royal scepter,
but you gave me a crown of thorns.
2: "My people...."
1: I raised you to the height of majesty,
but you have raised me high on a cross.
2: "My people...."
Share

Calculating Death Tolls in War

 From Kyle Orton at It Can Always Get Worse:

Over the last century, the nefarious geopolitical actor that most effectively exploited human psychology to further its cause was the Soviet Union and the current Russian government that is its successor. HAMAS benefits directly from this inheritance: it is a component of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), the vanguard of the Islamic Revolution that seized Iran in 1979, which had assistance from the KGB in constructing the security and intelligence services that keep it in power, and draws on the Soviet model of worldwide Revolution.

In this context, it is less surprising that the information operation HAMAS has run with the Gaza casualty figures resembles a classic of Moscow’s anchoring propaganda: the claim twenty-million Soviet citizens were killed fighting the Nazis.

A caveat to be added here is that while the Soviets/Russia have been particularly successful in sacralising the figure of twenty-seven million Soviet martyrs in the Anti-Nazi War, the success is a matter of degree not kind. For the reasons mentioned above, interested parties developing false casualty figures that persist is not in itself unusual.

The open secret is that war death tolls generally originate from one of the combatants and their supporters, either to try to sway the course of the war and/or to serve a political purpose in the aftermath, and these numbers are frequently invented wholesale.3 Human psychology being what it is, and the widespread equation of numbers with Science, propagandists can short-circuit policy debates by presenting the right number in the right way.4 More importantly, whether the tactic works or not for its narrow purposes, such propaganda-generated numbers “tend to be sticky and to take on lives of their own”.5

A major reason for the endurance of politically-derived casualty numbers is that they, and the emotive narratives they undergird, become important, materially and ideologically, to various constituencies,6 in the war-torn countries and abroad, from activists, academics, and journalists—fluid categories where a single individual often plays multiple roles—all the way up to governments, and repetition of the numbers by these opinion-forming authorities embeds them as conventional wisdom.7 Challengers to the numbers are fiercely resisted, often with vicious reputational attacks, which deter other doubters from going public, explaining the otherwise-baffling paucity of efforts to investigate the origins and veracity of totemic body counts.8 Even were there is a public effort at refutation, it often unintentionally reinforces the number by focusing on it.

The overall result is that casualty counts “everyone knows”, even for wars that have been studied for decades, are often mythical.9

An obvious corollary is that, when it comes to ongoing wars, honest people should be operating on the assumption that death tolls cannot be known, and that anybody making a claim to the contrary is at best lying to themselves and probably consciously trying to advance an untruth. A moment’s thought about the practicalities of carrying out a body count in a warzone is enough to realise that such a thing cannot be done in any meaningful sense, thus when a number is proffered—whether in Syria, Sudan, Congo, Haiti, Yemen—scepticism is in order about exactly where it has come from. The answer in most cases is an extrapolations that is indistinguishable from guesswork given the small sample size it is based on, or it is just outright made up.10 The strangely precise fatality figures proffered with even stranger levels of confidence for these conflicts should be a red flag, not a guide for policy, let alone people’s moral judgments. Gaza is special in this matrix only because we actually do know where the fatality count comes from.11 (Read more.)

Share

Queen Mary Prays over the Sick on Good Friday

From Nobility. It is always bittersweet for me to read about how much potential for being a great ruler Mary Tudor had. To quote from a contemporary report:
On [Good] Friday morning the offertory was performed according to custom in the Church of the Franciscan Friars, which is contiguous to the palace. After the Passion, the Queen came down from her oratory for the adoration of the Cross, accompanied by my lord the right reverend Legate, and kneeling at a short distance from the Cross moved towards It on her knees, praying before It thrice, and then she drew nigh and kissed It, performing this act with such devotion as greatly to edify all those who were present.
Her Majesty next gave her benediction to the rings, the mode of doing so being as follows: An inclosure (un riparo) was formed for her Majesty to the right of the high altar by means of four benches placed so as to form a square, into the center of which she again came down from her oratory, and placing herself on her knees within this inclosure, two large covered basins were brought to her, filled with rings of gold and silver, one of these basins containing rings of her own, whilst the other held those of private individuals (particolari), labelled with their owners’ names. On their being uncovered she commenced reciting a certain prayer and psalms, and then taking them in her two hands (pigliandoli a mano per mano), she passed them again and again from one hand to the other, saying another prayer, which commenced thus:—
Sanctifica, Domine, annulos istos.”

This being terminated, her Majesty went to bless the scrofulous, but she chose to perform this act privately in a gallery, where there were not above 20 persons; and an altar being raised there she knelt and recited the confession, on the conclusion of which her Majesty turned towards my Right Reverend Lord the Legate, who gave her absolution; whereupon a priest read from the Gospel according to St. Mark, and on his coming to the words— “Super ægros manus imponet et bene habebunt,” she caused one of those infirm women to be brought to her, and kneeling the whole time she commenced pressing, with her hands in the form of a cross, on the spot where the sore was, with such compassion and devotion as to be a marvel, and whilst she continued doing this to a man and to three women, the priest kept ever repeating these words:
Super ægros manus imponet et bene habebunt.”
Then on terminating the Gospel, after the words—
In principio erat verbum,”
and on coming to the following, namely,—
Erat lux vera quæ illuminat omnem hominem in hunc mundum,”
then the Queen made the sick people again approach her, and taking a golden coin called an angel, she touched the place where the evil showed itself, and signed it with this coin in the form of the cross; and having done this, she passed a ribbon through a hole which had been pierced in the coin, and placed one of these round the neck of each of the patients, making them promise never to part with that coin, which was hallowed, save in case of extreme need; and then, having washed her hands, the towel being presented to her by my Lord the Right Reverend the Legate, she returned to her oratory. (Read entire article.)
Share

Thursday, April 17, 2025

Franz Joseph Washing the Feet of the Poor

In accord with the ancient custom.
In 1850, Franz Joseph participated for the first time as emperor in the second of the traditional Habsburg expressions of dynastic piety: the Holy Thursday foot-washing ceremony, part of the four-day court observance of Easter. The master of the staff and the court prelates chose twelve poor elderly men, transported them to the Hofburg, and positioned them in the ceremonial hall on a raised dais. There, before an invited audience observing the scene from tribunes, the emperor served the men a symbolic meal and archdukes cleared the dishes. As a priest read aloud in Latin the words of the New Testament (John 3:15), “And he began to wash the feet of the disciples,” Franz Joseph knelt and, without rising from his knees, washed the feet of the twelve old men in imitation of Christ. Finally, the emperor placed a bag of twenty silver coins around the necks of each before the men were led away and returned to their homes in imperial coaches.(Read more.)
Share

Paper Confirms Pfizer mRNA Vaccine Contaminated

 From The Vigilant Fox:

"We finally have it—the very first published scientific evidence showing that the mRNA vaccine, Pfizer vaccines, were contaminated with bacterial plasmid DNA."

Dr. Mikolaj Raszek from Merogenomics just unpacked the world’s first peer-reviewed paper exposing DNA contamination in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine—oh, and it comes with a delightful bonus of the shady SV40 enhancer (SOURCE). Yep, that pristine shot millions rolled up their sleeves for? Not so pristine after all.

This isn’t some wild conspiracy scribbled on a napkin—it’s actual published science. For now, at least. Dr. Raszek’s already placing bets on its lifespan, saying, We'll see how long this might last before perhaps such information that just simply does not look good for the company, how long that might last before it gets retracted.” (Read more.)
Share

Blessed Karl, Clericalism and Lay Church Governance

 From Charles Coulombe at One Peter 5:

In many ways, Austro-Hungarian Emperor-King Franz Joseph epitomised the traditional relationship between the lay and clerical powers of the Church. As with the other Crowned Heads of Europe, he had inherited a particular style of Catholic devotion peculiar to his own dynasty – the Pietas Austriaca. Bound up with a veneration of the True Cross and the Passion, the Blessed Sacrament and the Sacred Heart, the Blessed Virgin and St. Joseph (the family patron), this religiosity had led to the tremendous collection of relics at the Hofburg, the Imperial Palace in Vienna. The Maundy Thursday Footwashing and the Corpus Christi procession were highlights of court life in Vienna, and in 1898 Franz Joseph led the Imperial Family in observing the Consecration of All Mankind to the Sacred Heart, led by Leo XIII in Rome. In the canon of the Mass, the Good Friday Collects, and the Holy Saturday Exsultet, the Emperor was prayed for by name.

Franz Joseph was crowned and anointed King of Hungary in 1867. As Emperor-King he appointed the Cardinals, Archbishops, and Bishops, subject to Papal approval. Exempt from this were Salzburg and Olomouc, their metropolitans being elected by the cathedral chapters, and the former ‘Salzburg dioceses’ of Seckau, Lavant, and Gurk. The Archbishop of Salzburg had the right of appointment for Seckau and Lavant, the occupation of Gurk was regulated in a mixed manner, that is, the Emperor proposed two candidates, the subsequent nomination was made by the Archbishop of Salzburg. The Nuncio had to be consulted to make sure that the choice was not obnoxious to the Pope – either disapproval would derail the process; the separate Austrian and Hungarian ministries of Worship and Education would do the research, but it was Franz Joseph who had to approve the choices, both for Latin and Eastern Rite Catholic Bishops. Moreover, he had to bear in mind that some of his appointees would sit in one or more legislatures within the Monarchy.

There were three national parliaments. In the Upper House – House of Lords (Herrenhaus) of the Austrian Parliament could be found the prince-archbishops of Vienna, Prague, Salzburg, Görz, and Olmütz, the archbishops of Lemberg and Zara, the Byzantine Catholic archbishop of Lemberg, the Armenian Catholic archbishop of Lemberg, and the Greek Orthodox archbishop of Czernowitz, as well as the prince-bishops of Brixen, Breslau (although located in what was then Germany, for the diocesan territory in Austrian Silesia), Krakau, Seckau, Trient, Laibach, Lavant, and Gurk. In the Hungarian Upper House, the Főrendiház or “House of Magnates,” had an even higher proportion of ecclesiastical members – although it was also more interfaith than Austria’s: forty-two dignitaries of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches, including the Primate, Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, and various other high officials, and thirteen representatives of the Protestant confessions. The annexation of Bosnia in 1908 presented a challenge in creating representative institutions for a region that had never known them. But while Bosnian diet (Sabor) would only one have one house, it would also have religious representatives appointed by the Monarch. These were, in deference to the Muslim majority, the Reis, who was the principal of Muslims’ granted lands, and the Muslims’ regional leader from Mostar; four Metropolitans and the president of the Orthodox community; the Catholic archbishop and two province members of Franciscan order of Bosnia and Herzegovina; and the Sephardic rabbi of the higher order. The various provincial diets in the Austrian half of the Monarchy also numbered the local Catholic bishops in their number.

Another religious duty that Franz Joseph took very seriously was that of funding missions – even though Austria-Hungary had no colonies. The Catholic Church in Scandinavia, Albania, and Bulgaria (Latin and Byzantine in that case) was heavily funded by the Emperor, as was the Church in the Holy Land and Egypt (the Coptic Catholic Church was funded from its beginning thereby, and Franz Joseph paid for the building of the Latin Catholic Cathedral of St. Catherine in Alexandria, where, ironically, the remains of  his wartime enemy King Victor Emmanuel III would rest until their recent repatriation to Italy). But since 1826, very largely out of funds given by both Franz Joseph and his two immediate predecessors, a large amount of this largesse went to the Church in the United States. Through an organisation called the Leopoldinenstiftung – the “Leopoldine Foundation” – the Habsburgs and many of their subjects poured millions of dollars into the American Church, founding 400 parishes, subsidising wholly or partly 300 missionaries (such as St. John Neumann and Ven. Bishop Baraga), and sending an endless flow of vestments, statues, stained glass, liturgical implements, and the like. A great deal of dynastic money went to Eastern Rite churches in the United States as well. Unfortunately, the outbreak of war in 1914 ended the flow of generosity – which, of course, would be repaid by Woodrow Wilson’s insistence of the deposition of Franz Jospeh’s successor, his exile, and the partition of his domains. (Read more.)

Share

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

The Best Place On Earth to Be a Parent

 

From Helen Roy:

Despair is a lie, perhaps the most insidious one available to American parents. Of course difficulty is real and inevitable, but despair paralyzes us precisely in the moment we, as the nucleus of democracy, are called to act in spite of our challenges. So… don’t despair. Plant the community garden. Start the co-op. Lobby for the rights of children and parents, and openly debate the particulars of what that really means. Run for the school board. Host the potluck. Become the village. We should clearly articulate the challenges of parenthood in the modern world, but not without a sincere and demonstrable effort to become of service to one another in real life first.

Our freedom—however fragile—is still real enough to wield, and it actually depends on our mutual trust, reliance, action, and willingness to engage with the truth. If Tocqueville was right, and I believe he was, the future of democracy—and the future of our children—depends on what we choose to do with that freedom right now. (Read more.)

Share

What Ever Happened to Q?

 From Sharyl's Substack:

Picture a digital bulletin board where faceless strangers swap secrets without names—an anonymous message board like 4chan, where anyone can post ideas, wild or mundane, shielded by a cloak of invisibility.

It’s there, in October 2017, that a figure dubbed “Q” sparked a wildfire called “QAnon.” An anonymous post claimed a shadowy cabal of elite pedophiles was locked in a secret war against then-President Donald Trump. They said Trump would soon unleash “The Storm” of mass arrests:

HRC extradition already in motion effective yesterday with several countries in case of cross border run. Passport approved to be flagged effective 10/30 @ 12:01am. Expect massive riots organized in defiance and others fleeing the US to occur. US M’s will conduct the operation while NG activated. Proof check: Locate a NG member and ask if activated for duty 10/30 across most major cities.

—October 28, 2017 post by an anonymous user with the ID "BQ7V3bcW.”

This was the initial "Q drop" that kicked off the QAnon conspiracy theory, claiming Hillary Clinton’s arrest was imminent, and predicting unrest.

From this obscure beginnings, QAnon surged to mainstream infamy, gripping millions with cryptic posts promising insider truths. Today, its blaze has dulled to embers, yet questions linger: Who was Q? Was it a Trump cheerleader or something else? Did any of its predictions hit the mark? And where do its traces hide today?

Read on for details. (Read more.)

Share

Life Under Pharaoh Akhenaten

 From The Greek Reporter:

Recent archaeological discoveries in Egypt are revealing new details about life under Pharaoh Akhenaten, offering a rare glimpse into a city frozen in time. More than 3,000 years ago, Pharaoh Akhenaten made a decision that uprooted an entire population. The ruler of ancient Egypt ordered citizens of So’oud Aten to seal their homes and move, leaving their belongings and everyday lives behind. The move was part of his effort to replace Egypt’s long-standing polytheism (worship of many gods) with monotheism, the worship of a single deity—Aten, the sun god.

“This is the pharaoh,” Egyptologist Zahi Hawass said in an interview with NBC News, “When the king makes a decision, everyone has to obey the decision.” (Read more.)

Share