Friday, April 18, 2025

Good Friday


From Daniel Mitsui.

The Reproaches (Improperia)
I.
1 and 2: My people, what have I done to you
How have I offended you? Answer me!
1: I led you out of Egypt,
from slavery to freedom,
but you led your Savior to the cross.
2: My people, what have I done to you?
How have I offended you? Answer me!

1: Holy is God!
2: Holy and strong!
1: Holy immortal One, have mercy on us!
1 and 2: For forty years I led you
safely through the desert.
I fed you with manna from heaven,
and brought you to a land of plenty; but you led your Savior to the cross.
Repeat "Holy is God..."
1 and 2: What more could I have done for you.
I planted you as my fairest vine,
but you yielded only bitterness:
when I was thirsty you gave me vinegar to drink,
and you pierced your Savior with a lance.
Repeat "Holy is God..." 
II.
1: For your sake I scourged your captors
and their firstborn sons,
but you brought your scourges down on me.
(Repeated throughout by Choir 2)
2: My people, what have I done to you?
How have I offended you? Answer me!
1: I led you from slavery to freedom
and drowned your captors in the sea,
but you handed me over to your high priests.
2: "My people...."
1: I opened the sea before you,
but you opened my side with a spear.
2: "My people...."
1: I led you on your way in a pillar of cloud,
but you led me to Pilate's court.
2: "My people...."
1: I bore you up with manna in the desert,
but you struck me down and scourged me.
2: "My people...."
1: I gave you saving water from the rock,
but you gave me gall and vinegar to drink.
2: "My people...."
1: For you I struck down the kings of Canaan.
but you struck my head with a reed.
2: "My people...."
1: I gave you a royal scepter,
but you gave me a crown of thorns.
2: "My people...."
1: I raised you to the height of majesty,
but you have raised me high on a cross.
2: "My people...."
Share

Calculating Death Tolls in War

 From Kyle Orton at It Can Always Get Worse:

Over the last century, the nefarious geopolitical actor that most effectively exploited human psychology to further its cause was the Soviet Union and the current Russian government that is its successor. HAMAS benefits directly from this inheritance: it is a component of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), the vanguard of the Islamic Revolution that seized Iran in 1979, which had assistance from the KGB in constructing the security and intelligence services that keep it in power, and draws on the Soviet model of worldwide Revolution.

In this context, it is less surprising that the information operation HAMAS has run with the Gaza casualty figures resembles a classic of Moscow’s anchoring propaganda: the claim twenty-million Soviet citizens were killed fighting the Nazis.

A caveat to be added here is that while the Soviets/Russia have been particularly successful in sacralising the figure of twenty-seven million Soviet martyrs in the Anti-Nazi War, the success is a matter of degree not kind. For the reasons mentioned above, interested parties developing false casualty figures that persist is not in itself unusual.

The open secret is that war death tolls generally originate from one of the combatants and their supporters, either to try to sway the course of the war and/or to serve a political purpose in the aftermath, and these numbers are frequently invented wholesale.3 Human psychology being what it is, and the widespread equation of numbers with Science, propagandists can short-circuit policy debates by presenting the right number in the right way.4 More importantly, whether the tactic works or not for its narrow purposes, such propaganda-generated numbers “tend to be sticky and to take on lives of their own”.5

A major reason for the endurance of politically-derived casualty numbers is that they, and the emotive narratives they undergird, become important, materially and ideologically, to various constituencies,6 in the war-torn countries and abroad, from activists, academics, and journalists—fluid categories where a single individual often plays multiple roles—all the way up to governments, and repetition of the numbers by these opinion-forming authorities embeds them as conventional wisdom.7 Challengers to the numbers are fiercely resisted, often with vicious reputational attacks, which deter other doubters from going public, explaining the otherwise-baffling paucity of efforts to investigate the origins and veracity of totemic body counts.8 Even were there is a public effort at refutation, it often unintentionally reinforces the number by focusing on it.

The overall result is that casualty counts “everyone knows”, even for wars that have been studied for decades, are often mythical.9

An obvious corollary is that, when it comes to ongoing wars, honest people should be operating on the assumption that death tolls cannot be known, and that anybody making a claim to the contrary is at best lying to themselves and probably consciously trying to advance an untruth. A moment’s thought about the practicalities of carrying out a body count in a warzone is enough to realise that such a thing cannot be done in any meaningful sense, thus when a number is proffered—whether in Syria, Sudan, Congo, Haiti, Yemen—scepticism is in order about exactly where it has come from. The answer in most cases is an extrapolations that is indistinguishable from guesswork given the small sample size it is based on, or it is just outright made up.10 The strangely precise fatality figures proffered with even stranger levels of confidence for these conflicts should be a red flag, not a guide for policy, let alone people’s moral judgments. Gaza is special in this matrix only because we actually do know where the fatality count comes from.11 (Read more.)

Share

Queen Mary Prays over the Sick on Good Friday

From Nobility. It is always bittersweet for me to read about how much potential for being a great ruler Mary Tudor had. To quote from a contemporary report:
On [Good] Friday morning the offertory was performed according to custom in the Church of the Franciscan Friars, which is contiguous to the palace. After the Passion, the Queen came down from her oratory for the adoration of the Cross, accompanied by my lord the right reverend Legate, and kneeling at a short distance from the Cross moved towards It on her knees, praying before It thrice, and then she drew nigh and kissed It, performing this act with such devotion as greatly to edify all those who were present.
Her Majesty next gave her benediction to the rings, the mode of doing so being as follows: An inclosure (un riparo) was formed for her Majesty to the right of the high altar by means of four benches placed so as to form a square, into the center of which she again came down from her oratory, and placing herself on her knees within this inclosure, two large covered basins were brought to her, filled with rings of gold and silver, one of these basins containing rings of her own, whilst the other held those of private individuals (particolari), labelled with their owners’ names. On their being uncovered she commenced reciting a certain prayer and psalms, and then taking them in her two hands (pigliandoli a mano per mano), she passed them again and again from one hand to the other, saying another prayer, which commenced thus:—
Sanctifica, Domine, annulos istos.”

This being terminated, her Majesty went to bless the scrofulous, but she chose to perform this act privately in a gallery, where there were not above 20 persons; and an altar being raised there she knelt and recited the confession, on the conclusion of which her Majesty turned towards my Right Reverend Lord the Legate, who gave her absolution; whereupon a priest read from the Gospel according to St. Mark, and on his coming to the words— “Super ægros manus imponet et bene habebunt,” she caused one of those infirm women to be brought to her, and kneeling the whole time she commenced pressing, with her hands in the form of a cross, on the spot where the sore was, with such compassion and devotion as to be a marvel, and whilst she continued doing this to a man and to three women, the priest kept ever repeating these words:
Super ægros manus imponet et bene habebunt.”
Then on terminating the Gospel, after the words—
In principio erat verbum,”
and on coming to the following, namely,—
Erat lux vera quæ illuminat omnem hominem in hunc mundum,”
then the Queen made the sick people again approach her, and taking a golden coin called an angel, she touched the place where the evil showed itself, and signed it with this coin in the form of the cross; and having done this, she passed a ribbon through a hole which had been pierced in the coin, and placed one of these round the neck of each of the patients, making them promise never to part with that coin, which was hallowed, save in case of extreme need; and then, having washed her hands, the towel being presented to her by my Lord the Right Reverend the Legate, she returned to her oratory. (Read entire article.)
Share

Thursday, April 17, 2025

Franz Joseph Washing the Feet of the Poor

In accord with the ancient custom.
In 1850, Franz Joseph participated for the first time as emperor in the second of the traditional Habsburg expressions of dynastic piety: the Holy Thursday foot-washing ceremony, part of the four-day court observance of Easter. The master of the staff and the court prelates chose twelve poor elderly men, transported them to the Hofburg, and positioned them in the ceremonial hall on a raised dais. There, before an invited audience observing the scene from tribunes, the emperor served the men a symbolic meal and archdukes cleared the dishes. As a priest read aloud in Latin the words of the New Testament (John 3:15), “And he began to wash the feet of the disciples,” Franz Joseph knelt and, without rising from his knees, washed the feet of the twelve old men in imitation of Christ. Finally, the emperor placed a bag of twenty silver coins around the necks of each before the men were led away and returned to their homes in imperial coaches.(Read more.)
Share

Paper Confirms Pfizer mRNA Vaccine Contaminated

 From The Vigilant Fox:

"We finally have it—the very first published scientific evidence showing that the mRNA vaccine, Pfizer vaccines, were contaminated with bacterial plasmid DNA."

Dr. Mikolaj Raszek from Merogenomics just unpacked the world’s first peer-reviewed paper exposing DNA contamination in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine—oh, and it comes with a delightful bonus of the shady SV40 enhancer (SOURCE). Yep, that pristine shot millions rolled up their sleeves for? Not so pristine after all.

This isn’t some wild conspiracy scribbled on a napkin—it’s actual published science. For now, at least. Dr. Raszek’s already placing bets on its lifespan, saying, We'll see how long this might last before perhaps such information that just simply does not look good for the company, how long that might last before it gets retracted.” (Read more.)
Share

Blessed Karl, Clericalism and Lay Church Governance

 From Charles Coulombe at One Peter 5:

In many ways, Austro-Hungarian Emperor-King Franz Joseph epitomised the traditional relationship between the lay and clerical powers of the Church. As with the other Crowned Heads of Europe, he had inherited a particular style of Catholic devotion peculiar to his own dynasty – the Pietas Austriaca. Bound up with a veneration of the True Cross and the Passion, the Blessed Sacrament and the Sacred Heart, the Blessed Virgin and St. Joseph (the family patron), this religiosity had led to the tremendous collection of relics at the Hofburg, the Imperial Palace in Vienna. The Maundy Thursday Footwashing and the Corpus Christi procession were highlights of court life in Vienna, and in 1898 Franz Joseph led the Imperial Family in observing the Consecration of All Mankind to the Sacred Heart, led by Leo XIII in Rome. In the canon of the Mass, the Good Friday Collects, and the Holy Saturday Exsultet, the Emperor was prayed for by name.

Franz Joseph was crowned and anointed King of Hungary in 1867. As Emperor-King he appointed the Cardinals, Archbishops, and Bishops, subject to Papal approval. Exempt from this were Salzburg and Olomouc, their metropolitans being elected by the cathedral chapters, and the former ‘Salzburg dioceses’ of Seckau, Lavant, and Gurk. The Archbishop of Salzburg had the right of appointment for Seckau and Lavant, the occupation of Gurk was regulated in a mixed manner, that is, the Emperor proposed two candidates, the subsequent nomination was made by the Archbishop of Salzburg. The Nuncio had to be consulted to make sure that the choice was not obnoxious to the Pope – either disapproval would derail the process; the separate Austrian and Hungarian ministries of Worship and Education would do the research, but it was Franz Joseph who had to approve the choices, both for Latin and Eastern Rite Catholic Bishops. Moreover, he had to bear in mind that some of his appointees would sit in one or more legislatures within the Monarchy.

There were three national parliaments. In the Upper House – House of Lords (Herrenhaus) of the Austrian Parliament could be found the prince-archbishops of Vienna, Prague, Salzburg, Görz, and Olmütz, the archbishops of Lemberg and Zara, the Byzantine Catholic archbishop of Lemberg, the Armenian Catholic archbishop of Lemberg, and the Greek Orthodox archbishop of Czernowitz, as well as the prince-bishops of Brixen, Breslau (although located in what was then Germany, for the diocesan territory in Austrian Silesia), Krakau, Seckau, Trient, Laibach, Lavant, and Gurk. In the Hungarian Upper House, the Főrendiház or “House of Magnates,” had an even higher proportion of ecclesiastical members – although it was also more interfaith than Austria’s: forty-two dignitaries of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches, including the Primate, Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, and various other high officials, and thirteen representatives of the Protestant confessions. The annexation of Bosnia in 1908 presented a challenge in creating representative institutions for a region that had never known them. But while Bosnian diet (Sabor) would only one have one house, it would also have religious representatives appointed by the Monarch. These were, in deference to the Muslim majority, the Reis, who was the principal of Muslims’ granted lands, and the Muslims’ regional leader from Mostar; four Metropolitans and the president of the Orthodox community; the Catholic archbishop and two province members of Franciscan order of Bosnia and Herzegovina; and the Sephardic rabbi of the higher order. The various provincial diets in the Austrian half of the Monarchy also numbered the local Catholic bishops in their number.

Another religious duty that Franz Joseph took very seriously was that of funding missions – even though Austria-Hungary had no colonies. The Catholic Church in Scandinavia, Albania, and Bulgaria (Latin and Byzantine in that case) was heavily funded by the Emperor, as was the Church in the Holy Land and Egypt (the Coptic Catholic Church was funded from its beginning thereby, and Franz Joseph paid for the building of the Latin Catholic Cathedral of St. Catherine in Alexandria, where, ironically, the remains of  his wartime enemy King Victor Emmanuel III would rest until their recent repatriation to Italy). But since 1826, very largely out of funds given by both Franz Joseph and his two immediate predecessors, a large amount of this largesse went to the Church in the United States. Through an organisation called the Leopoldinenstiftung – the “Leopoldine Foundation” – the Habsburgs and many of their subjects poured millions of dollars into the American Church, founding 400 parishes, subsidising wholly or partly 300 missionaries (such as St. John Neumann and Ven. Bishop Baraga), and sending an endless flow of vestments, statues, stained glass, liturgical implements, and the like. A great deal of dynastic money went to Eastern Rite churches in the United States as well. Unfortunately, the outbreak of war in 1914 ended the flow of generosity – which, of course, would be repaid by Woodrow Wilson’s insistence of the deposition of Franz Jospeh’s successor, his exile, and the partition of his domains. (Read more.)

Share

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

The Best Place On Earth to Be a Parent

 

From Helen Roy:

Despair is a lie, perhaps the most insidious one available to American parents. Of course difficulty is real and inevitable, but despair paralyzes us precisely in the moment we, as the nucleus of democracy, are called to act in spite of our challenges. So… don’t despair. Plant the community garden. Start the co-op. Lobby for the rights of children and parents, and openly debate the particulars of what that really means. Run for the school board. Host the potluck. Become the village. We should clearly articulate the challenges of parenthood in the modern world, but not without a sincere and demonstrable effort to become of service to one another in real life first.

Our freedom—however fragile—is still real enough to wield, and it actually depends on our mutual trust, reliance, action, and willingness to engage with the truth. If Tocqueville was right, and I believe he was, the future of democracy—and the future of our children—depends on what we choose to do with that freedom right now. (Read more.)

Share

What Ever Happened to Q?

 From Sharyl's Substack:

Picture a digital bulletin board where faceless strangers swap secrets without names—an anonymous message board like 4chan, where anyone can post ideas, wild or mundane, shielded by a cloak of invisibility.

It’s there, in October 2017, that a figure dubbed “Q” sparked a wildfire called “QAnon.” An anonymous post claimed a shadowy cabal of elite pedophiles was locked in a secret war against then-President Donald Trump. They said Trump would soon unleash “The Storm” of mass arrests:

HRC extradition already in motion effective yesterday with several countries in case of cross border run. Passport approved to be flagged effective 10/30 @ 12:01am. Expect massive riots organized in defiance and others fleeing the US to occur. US M’s will conduct the operation while NG activated. Proof check: Locate a NG member and ask if activated for duty 10/30 across most major cities.

—October 28, 2017 post by an anonymous user with the ID "BQ7V3bcW.”

This was the initial "Q drop" that kicked off the QAnon conspiracy theory, claiming Hillary Clinton’s arrest was imminent, and predicting unrest.

From this obscure beginnings, QAnon surged to mainstream infamy, gripping millions with cryptic posts promising insider truths. Today, its blaze has dulled to embers, yet questions linger: Who was Q? Was it a Trump cheerleader or something else? Did any of its predictions hit the mark? And where do its traces hide today?

Read on for details. (Read more.)

Share

Life Under Pharaoh Akhenaten

 From The Greek Reporter:

Recent archaeological discoveries in Egypt are revealing new details about life under Pharaoh Akhenaten, offering a rare glimpse into a city frozen in time. More than 3,000 years ago, Pharaoh Akhenaten made a decision that uprooted an entire population. The ruler of ancient Egypt ordered citizens of So’oud Aten to seal their homes and move, leaving their belongings and everyday lives behind. The move was part of his effort to replace Egypt’s long-standing polytheism (worship of many gods) with monotheism, the worship of a single deity—Aten, the sun god.

“This is the pharaoh,” Egyptologist Zahi Hawass said in an interview with NBC News, “When the king makes a decision, everyone has to obey the decision.” (Read more.)

Share

Tuesday, April 15, 2025

The Temple Church of London

 From Abbey of Misrule:

The Temple, meanwhile, is accessed down windy little lanes which look more like the backstreets of Oxford than central London. There’s a reason for that. This area is home to the four ancient ‘Inns of Court’, all of which have excellent Tolkeiny names: Lincoln’s Inn, Gray’s Inn, the Middle Temple and the Inner Temple. London is a city whose place names sometimes seem to have been invented for the specific purpose of appearing in a fantasy novel. Consider some of the stops on the Tube network: Shepherd’s Bush, White City, Mansion House, Tower Hill, Earl’s Court. You imagine dreamy meadows, knights errant pursuing dragons, stone palaces behind high walls, glittering spires. And then you actually visit.

Alas, the Inns of Court are also less Romantic in reality than they sound: they are the place where British barristers go to learn their trade. But even though barristers are far more boring than knights, the Inns of Court still look like they belong in another age, resembling Oxford colleges or Tudor Palaces, at least from the outside.

But why are lawyers learning about tort theory in a place that sounds like it was named by Aleister Crowley? Could there possibly be an interesting historical explanation? Thrillingly enough, the answer is yes.

The Temple got its name because originally it was home to a mysterious and mystical medieval order that everyone has surely heard of: the Knights Templar. The Templars - or, to give them their proper name, the ‘Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon’, were founded in France in the wake of the First Crusade, when a group of knights set themselves the task of protecting Christian pilgrims to the Holy Land. Over time, they became a wealthy, influential and powerful religious order. Committed, like monks, to vows of poverty, chastity and obedience, they were also committed, unlike monks, to smiting with their blades the enemies of Christ. (Read more.)

Share

How Pornography Ravaged American Culture

 From Mark Judge at The Washington Examiner:

In his 2005 encyclical God is Love, Pope Benedict defended the Christian view of sexual love. Despite those who claimed that Christians were killjoys when it comes to sex, Benedict offered a correction. Christianity “in no way rejected eros as such; rather, it declared war on a warped and destructive form of it, because this counterfeit divinization of eros actually strips it of its dignity and dehumanizes it.”

As Benedict explained, “The prostitutes in the [Greek] temple, who had to bestow this divine intoxication, were not treated as human beings and persons, but simply used as a means of arousing ‘divine madness’: far from being goddesses, they were human persons being exploited.”

Reclaiming genuine eros is at the heart of a brilliant new bookGirl on Girl: How Pop Culture Turned a Generation of Women Against Themselves by Sophie Gilbert. Gilbert is not a religious scholar but a liberal journalist. Even so, it is a profound work, beautifully written and deeply researched. (Read more.)

Share

What Happened to King Priam's Gold?

 I know I have blogged about this before; I find it endlessly fascinating. From The Greek Reporter:

In 1871, Schliemann began excavation work on the site of Hisarlik, now recognized as the ancient city of Troy. After discovering a level known as Troy II and identifying it as the same Troy written about in the Iliad, his next aim was to find the gold Treasure of Priam.

Being that Priam was the monarch of Troy, Schliemann deduced he must have hidden his treasure somewhere in the city to prevent it from being stolen by the Greeks if his city fell. On May 31, 1873, Schliemann unearthed the legendary treasure he was seeking. He supposedly stumbled upon it by chance, as he is said to have caught a glimpse of gold in the trench-face while straightening the side of a trench on the southwestern side of the site.

Despite Schliemann’s report that the Treasure of Priam was a singular find, other scholars have doubted this claim, arguing it was but a section of the full treasure, of which most of the significant objects were unearthed by Schliemann. Other artifacts were discovered at an earlier date. Once the treasure had been found, Ottoman authorities were keen to get their hands on it. However, Schliemann was against this and devised a strategy to get the artifacts out of Ottoman territory. A mystery still surrounds the manner in which Schliemann managed to do this, and many posited suggestions and theories have tried to explain it. One tale has it that Schliemann’s wife, Sophia, smuggled bits of the treasure through Ottoman customs by hiding them in her knickers. Schliemann was eventually sued by the Ottoman government. (Read more.)

Share

Monday, April 14, 2025

Visigoths vs. Islam



 I am so glad someone is writing about Visigothic Spain! Spain is the only country to date that, after being conquered by Islam, became Christian again. I think some of the religious art looks almost Celtic. From Hilary White at The Sacred Images Project:

In the standard classroom version of history in which the Visigoths tend to appear, they helped Alaric sack Rome in 410 and then faded from the story like a storm that passed through. But in reality, they didn’t vanish. They converted to orthodox Nicene Christianity (eventually), settled, governed and for over a century and a half built a Christian kingdom in Spain, one that developed its own liturgy, theology and sacred aesthetic. That kingdom, once powerful enough to host ecumenical councils and produce some of the finest goldsmithing in post-Roman Europe, collapsed almost overnight in 711, when Muslim armies crossed the Strait of Gibraltar and defeated the last Visigothic king. The Christian kingdom of Spain disappeared, and its remnants and refugees fled.

In today’s post for all subscribers, we’re turning west - far west - to explore what happened to Christian sacred art in Visigothic Spain. This often-overlooked kingdom, briefly powerful, deeply Christian and artistically distinct, was building its own sacred culture when it was suddenly extinguished. Before that moment, Spain had its own councils, its own churches, its own treasures offered in gold and stone. It even had a court and legal culture shaped by theology. And then, in the space of a few years, it was all gone.

By the end of the 7th century, Imperial Rome was a distant memory and Western Europe had splintered into a mosaic of kingdoms. We’ve talked about the Lombards in Italy, the Merovingians in Gaul, and the continuing Eastern influence in Rome and southern Italy, but what about the furthest Mediterranean edge of the old empire? What about Spain? We might forget that before the coming of Islam, Spain was the centre of a Christian kingdom, ruled not by Romans but by Visigoths who had arrived from eastern Europe in the 4th and 5th centuries. And for a brief time, this Visigothic kingdom had begun to forge a sacred culture of its own: Christian, Latin, and increasingly orthodox (that is, Nicene) Christians.

Then one day, across the narrow strait of Gibraltar came a Muslim force led by Tariq ibn Ziyad, under orders from the Umayyad caliph in Damascus. The Visigoths, fractured by internal rivalries and recent civil war, were unprepared. Five of the 25 kings who ruled between 470 and 710 were assassinated, five were dethroned and five had to face a conspiracy. King Roderic of Spain, last of the Visigothic kings, whose legitimacy was contested even before the invasion, met the army in battle near the Guadalete River. (Read more.)


Share

It's Darkest Before Dawn

 From Tierney's Real News:

As I predicted, President Trump quietly announced on Truth Social that he is purposefully crashing the stock market, as part of his Save America plan, in order to force the Federal Reserve into lowering interest rates. Why? So that the economy can thrive with lower borrowing costs and we can reduce the US TRILLION DOLLAR interest debt. It’s always darkest before the dawn. 

VIDEO: “Trump is crashing the stock market by 20% this month, but he’s doing it on purpose. This is why Warren Buffett just said that President Trump is making the best economic moves for the country that he’s seen in over 50 years. Here’s the secret game he’s playing. He’s pushing cash into US Treasuries which forces the Fed to slash interest rates in May.

These lower rates gives the Fed the ability to REFINANCE TRILLIONS of dollars of debt very inexpensively. It also weakens the dollar and drops mortgage rates for consumers. His tariff strategy is a genius play. It actually forces companies to build here to dodge them. It also forces farmers to sell more of their products here in the US to bring grocery prices way down. We’ve already seen this with eggs.

Remember, 94% of all stocks are owned by only 8% of Americans. So, President Trump is taking from the rich short-term and handing the money to the middle-class through lower prices.”
(Read more.)

 

Also from Mrs. Tierney:

President Trump’s entire goal with tariffs is to bring critical industry back to America (or to countries that we can trust won’t turn them against us) so we aren’t beholding to our enemies for things we really need. Can you imagine relying on an enemy for things we need to survive and then have them declare war on us? Where would we be then? Remember during COVID when they told us that antibiotics were in short supply because they all come from Communist China? That’s just insane.

We can keep some manufacturing in other countries for things we can live without - and where the economics don’t make sense to move to America - but that is a delicate balancing act and must be dealt with line by line.

Trump originally imposed a 10% baseline tariff on nearly all trading partners, with higher rates (20%-50%) targeting specific countries, particularly China. National security concerns drive separate processes for semiconductors and pharmaceuticals under something called Section 232 investigations - which the media always fails to mention. (Read more.)

 

On "J. D. Vance and the Pursuit of American Happiness" from C.C. Pecknold at Postliberal Order:

I am very biased, but it strikes me as obvious and reasonable to state that we have never had a more compelling Catholic statesman in the White House. We will be comparing J.D. Vance to John F. Kennedy for many years, not only for their similarities but also for their deep differences as Catholic statesmen. They share, of course, manly vigor and rhetorical power. But where JFK held his faith in abeyance, with Catholic principles subordinated to the rules of liberal order, JDV takes a much more traditional approach — it is among the duties of a Catholic statesman that Christian principles will inform decisions of governance, not be separated from them. To win high office in America at the peak liberalism’s power meant conformity to the liberal arrangement in which Christian faith belonged to a private and personal realm, and religion played no role in public decision-making. Octagenarian Catholic politicians like Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi exemplified the weakness of this approach as they showed up at Mass as private persons, but voted against the Church’s moral code in public. The Vice President represents the opposite of this liberal standard. He has stated very clearly that religious liberty is not just about legal safeguards, but it’s about supporting and encouraging faith in God. And he’s not been shy about expressing that faith in a way which actually illuminates government policies such as we have seen in his appeal to the ordo amoris for explaining immigration policy. (Read more.)

Share

Dear Woke Left: Hands Off Jeanne d’Arc!

 From The European Conservative:

She suffered from a destiny that Heaven had asked of her. Her young and tender heart made her shed tears when she saw one of her enemies wounded near her, or when she felt the full weight of the injustice of her judges. She did not consider for a second carrying an iron and preferred to go into battle carrying a banner bearing the names of Jesus and Mary.

The Church that condemned her to the stake was not the brutally patriarchal force feminists like to depict. While Bishop Cauchon wanted her dead, other priests assisted her, confessed her, brought her communion, and bowed to the grace and strength that emanated from the courageous girl of Lorraine.

Even today, some feminists are up in arms and defending their Jeanne d’Arc because they don’t get their own back in the travesty—dare we say the word—of the young woman as a queer activist. Jeanne d’Arc also has a message for women, as a fully-fledged woman: “pursue your ideal, don’t let yourself be intimidated by those who want to stand in your way.” It’s a fact: Jeanne is an inspiring woman, even for a progressive feminist.

For seven hundred years, Jeanne’s case has been a source of questioning and turmoil. In her time, she knew how to win the hearts of the soldiers who began to march in her wake, without really understanding what was happening to them. With her candour and strength, she disarmed the judges who wanted her dead.

We therefore ask our English friends to leave Jeanne in peace and to follow the example of those soldiers who, during the First World War, when she was still just a blessed, prayed to her to give them the strength to defeat the enemy. (Read more.)

Share

Sunday, April 13, 2025

Marie Antoinette’s Bridal Journey

The new Dauphine enters Strasbourg
The fourteen-year-old Marie-Antoinette crosses the border into France in May, 1770, clothed in a golden dress. In the background can be seen the pavilion where the new Dauphine surrendered all of her Austrian clothes and possessions and was dressed in French garb.
The Dauphine Marie-Antoinette (The portrait in the article is actually not Marie-Antoinette but her sister Archduchess Josefa.

 From Royal Central:

The procession had its afore-planned route, which had been worked out well in advance, to meet the necessary needs of both the practical and the ceremonial. Horses had to be ready at their posts to be changed when the procession met them en route. En route stops meant fireworks, music, triumphal arches, receptions, theatrical performances. In short, it was a justly apt preparation in more ways than one, for the court of Versailles, from where Marie Antoinette would write a mere two months after her arrival, “I put on my rouge… in front of all the whole world.”

Bells rang when the procession entered; canons were fired. Invariably for such a huge retinue, it was necessary to find places to stop overnight, which could accommodate the Dauphine as well as her suite, ladies-in-waiting and attendants. Often, monasteries and castles appear to have been chosen, as they represented places equal in size as well as importance which could be deemed worthy of receiving en route both an Austrian Archduchess as well as a future French Queen. As such, the roads had to be made passable, streets improved and food and fine cutlery sourced in enough quantity as would be needed.

Marie Antoinette’s journey would cross much of the Holy Roman Empire, of which her father had been Emperor in his lifetime, her mother being Holy Roman Empress also, albeit by marriage. Crucially, she would then be handed over formally to France as its future Dauphine, but this time in order to ‘become’ fully French, thereafter entering Strasbourg and then her father’s former duchy of Lorraine. Many of the cities and towns through which she passed would count the passing of her procession through them as a high point in their cultural history. (Read more.)
More HERE.

My biography of the Queen, HERE.
Share

The War on Elon Musk

 From Amuse on X:

In politics, as in physics, action begets reaction. Elon Musk’s fifteen-point favorability decline did not happen in a vacuum. According to Nate Silver, Musk’s popularity dropped 14 percent compared to Donald Trump’s 5 percent in the same period. That fact might seem to suggest Musk has become politically radioactive by his own hand. But it is Musk himself who best explains this phenomenon: “The inevitable outcome of having a political propaganda war waged against me while I have almost no countervailing campaign and, at times, digging my own grave way better than my enemies do.” He is half right. He does dig. But the grave was dug long before he arrived with a shovel.

To understand Musk’s collapse in public favor, one must understand the architecture of attack that surrounds him. This architecture is neither spontaneous nor benign. It is not simply a matter of critics online or the backlash of market sentiment. It is the result of a coordinated, well-funded, digitally networked, multi-platform propaganda and protest apparatus that has made Elon Musk the central symbol of the Left’s war on free enterprise, masculinity, decentralization, and dissent.

Musk is not merely a billionaire. He is a billionaire who dared to criticize the cathedral. He mocked sacred cows, opened the gates of Twitter to previously banned accounts, and embraced Donald Trump. He embodies, in one man, too many heresies for the Left to tolerate. That is why he is the subject of a relentless campaign, not simply of criticism, but of coordinated delegitimization. (Read more.)


Share

Pollinators in Peril

 From WBOC:

Bee distributors and keepers have reported mysterious and dramatic spikes in honey bee die-offs recently, and local beekeepers say the impacts of the deaths may soon be felt at farms and grocery stores if they continue. Hundreds of millions of bees have died in the past eight months, according to experts, threatening to plunge beekeepers and farmers - both here on Delmarva and nationally - into a crisis. There is currently no consensus on what is causing the die-offs. Dr. Jeff Pettis, an entomologist in Salisbury and President of Apimondia, the International Federation of Beekeepers’ Associations, tells WBOC it could be a complex array of factors. (Read more.)

Share

Saturday, April 12, 2025

Marie-Antoinette Accused

"Marie Antoinette listening to the Act of Accusation" by Edward Matthew Ward.
She would never understand the audacity that enabled an individual to lie so shamefacedly, in such elaborate detail and at such great lengths about events that existed only in his mind, or in another's equally depraved. Had her poor husband gone through this, she wondered? Surely, he had; now it was behind him, and he was in Heaven.
~from Trianon, Chapter Seven: "The Sacrifice"
Share

Marine Le Pen and the Weaponized Judiciary

 From First Things:

Her current rise reflects in many ways a right-wing shift in French politics. Once shunned as a racist proposition, the National Rally’s central campaign plank, ending mass immigration from the Global South, is now increasingly being accepted by French public opinion. According to a 2023 poll, 64 percent of the French want non-European immigration to be curtailed. Another poll shows, even more tellingly, that 51 percent of the left-wing, pro-immigration and pro-Islamic LFI party’s voters agree that there are too many non-European immigrants.

But more factors are also working in Marine Le Pen’s favor this time. One of her major achievements, since she succeeded her father Jean-Marie Le Pen as party leader in 2011, was to “dedemonize” the party and win over hitherto reluctant voters: Once smacking of Vichy State nostalgia, the National Rally turned into a neo-Gaullist and democratic organization. 

Additionally, Macron will not be taking part in the 2027 election. A 2008 amendment limits French presidents to two consecutive five-year terms. Macron must therefore forego the election, though he may run again in 2032. This dynamic puts Le Pen at a distinct advantage against less prominent or less seasoned opponents, including Edouard Philippe, a former Macronist prime minister, who is polling at 21 percent.

But that’s only if Le Pen is allowed to run in 2027—and incredibly, she might not be. (Read more.)

Share

How Britpoppers Killed Patriotism

 From Mary Harrington at UnHerd:

This generation came of age in the End of History era, in which the kind of hard-edged patriotism that inspires young men to enlist in armies seemed obsolete, hopefully for good. In its place emerged something softer: a vision of nationhood as without enemies, only friends we hadn’t met yet. Now, though, the world is changing. Can this kind of inclusive patriotism still awaken the fighting spirit, in an emergency? The Britpoppers have, until now, presided over a world sufficiently peaceful that this question never really came up. But as the world has grown more dangerous, the shrillness of their bellicosity suggests they’re worried the answer might be “no”.

Starmer himself is arguably himself a post-national Britpopper par excellence. He declares himself “proud of being patriotic”, though the Tories demur; for example Robert Jenrick recently called him a “quisling” for seeking to hand control of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. More generally, conservatives of both small and large C varieties accuse his regime of harbouring deep animus toward Britain, as expressed in Labour policy toward anything even tenuously English-coded, from independent schools to small farmers, provincial churches, and even history itself.

How does this add up? The explanation is simple: Starmer is all for Britpopper patriotism, of the Spice Girls Union Jack and globalisation variety: the kind where national identity is lightly worn, inclusive, and adequately expressed by “British Values”, like a Three Lions football shirt, for sale to anyone who wants to wear one. By contrast, the older, harder style of patriotism saw nations as having both friends and enemies. But since the war, and especially since the End of History, this version has become indelibly associated with racism, jingoism, and hostile, exclusionary sentiments. Starmer’s not for that.

The gap between this End of History Britpopper patriotism, and the harder-edged one that preceded it, was captured in vivid microcosm in the LBC exchange between Matthew Wright and John the Cockney. John tried to explain to Wright that Britain going to war today would be a non-starter, simply because patriotic solidarity has ebbed along with ethnic homogeneity. He was circumspect in his phrasing, saying only that Britain can’t fight because “we haven’t got the people any more”. He continued with the example of how the East End Cockneys left London and “ran for refuge”. And though he doesn’t say what they were running from, the clear implication is that he’s referring to that area’s well-documented postwar demographic change. In John’s view, those who replaced the Cockneys are unlikely to be as willing as they were, to fight for Britain: “If you went by these schools in the morning…you know…it’s unbelievable. Them kids wouldn’t be fighting.” (Read more.)


Share

Friday, April 11, 2025

Madame de la Motte

The infamous conartist Jeanne de la Motte-Valois has a prominent role in the execrable PBS program about Marie-Antoinette. I have never seen the above picture identified as Madame de la Motte, the adventuress who precipitated the Diamond Necklace Scandal. But the following article identifies it as being Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy. If anyone knows differently, then please let me know. From Headstuff:
 Nobility in pre-Revolutionary France was something of a double-edged sword. Of course it came with great privilege, and the nobles of France were permitted behaviour that was unthinkable for those of lower orders. But it also came with obligations, and one of the most notable of these was that it was unthinkable for a noble to earn their living at a trade. As such there were many people who were rich in name but poor in cash, forced to rely on the charity of the more influential to provide them with official positions and largesse. In that atmosphere of desperation many were prepared to go to great lengths to get what they felt they were owed; but few went quite as far as Jeanne de la Motte.

She was born as Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy in 1756, a name that was derived directly from her noble lineage. Her father Jacques was descended from King Henry II of France (of the House of Valois) and his mistress Nicole de Savigny. Even two hundred years old and from the “wrong side of the blanket”, royal blood was more than enough to grant one the status of nobility. Their illegitimate son had been granted the title of Comte de Saint-Rémy, a title Jacques still claimed. Jeanne’s mother Marie came from far less noble stock; she was a maidservant who Jacques got pregnant. This wasn’t uncommon; what was uncommon was that Jacques insisted on marrying her despite his father’s protestations. This argument delayed their marriage until 1755, by which time they had already had two children. Jeanne (born a year later) was their first legitimate child.

Though Jacques inherited an estate from his father near Bar-sur-Aubein the northeast of France, he did not really inherit enough money to maintain it; at least not combined with his constant drunkenness and Marie’s spendthrift nature. Jeanne would later in her autobiography blame her mother for squandering the inheritance, but this may have been to cover up how little there was to squander. Visitors to the estate noted how the children had to do farmyard chores, and do them barefoot. It was only thanks to the charity of the locals that they survived.

When Jeanne was young, Jacques decided to move the family to Paris where he hoped to find opportunities for a noble like himself. It was a vain hope, and he was reduced to literally begging on the street. He died in 1762, when Jeanne was only six years old. Her mother soon took on a new lover and abandoned her three surviving children into the care of a charitable local, the Marquise de Boulainvilliers.

This proved to be a fortunate occurrence for the children, as the Marquise’s wife took a liking to her new foster children. Jeanne would later describe her as her “true mother”. Luckily for them, one of the things that the nobles of France had and the rest of the country did not was a social safety net. Once Madame de Boulainvilliers was able to prove their royal lineage they were entitled to a small annual stipend from the crown; enough for Jeanne’s brother Jacques to go to a military academy and for Jeanne and her sister Marie-Anne to attend a boarding school. When they completed their schooling they were sent into a convent, but Jeanne turned out not to have “the monastic temperament”. In 1776 she ran away from the convent (taking her little sister with her) and returned back to her childhood home in Bar-sur-Aube.

There she was taken in by the Surmont family, landed gentry with their own distant link to the nobility. After four years in their household, she married a nephew of the household by the name of Nicolas de la Motte, an officer in the gendarmerie (a local militia that was a precursor to the police). It was a whirlwind romance, necessitated by the fact that Jeanne was heavily pregnant when she was married.

She herself gives very little details about how she and Nicolas came to get married; scandalous later rumours implied that she fell pregnant from a lover she could not marry and swiftly ensnared Nicholas as a marriageable prospect and convinced him the children were his. Why could she not marry her lover? Because, said the rumours, the father was actually the man who officiated at her wedding: the Bishop of Langres. Whether this was true or not is impossible to say; she gave birth to twins shortly after the wedding but they only survived a few days. Infant mortality like that was a cruel fact of life back in those days. (Read more.)
Share

Silk Purses and Royal Scandal

 From History...the Interesting Bits:

On an earlier visit to France Isabella of France, wife of Edward II of England, had given silk purses to her sisters-in-law, as souvenirs of the knighting of her 3 brothers, Louis, Philip and Charles, the sons of Philip IV. When she visited again in 1314, Isabella saw these same silk purses on the belts of 2 knights of the French court; brothers Gautier and Philippe d’Aunay. When Isabella brought this to her father’s attention, the matter was investigated and the brothers were put under surveillance.

The 2 knights, it seems, were meeting with the princesses in secret. The whole scandal became known as the Tour de Nesle Affair, as the clandestine meetings were supposed to have taken place in this small palace on the outskirts of Paris (although some sources suggest that events happened at Philip IV’s country retreat of Maubuisson Abbey). (Read more.)

Share

Thursday, April 10, 2025

She Never Said It

From Reading Treasure:
Marie Antoinette did not say "Let them eat cake!" 
Yet "Let them eat cake!" isn't the only phrase frequently attributed to the last queen of France. A quick cursory search on Google or numerous social media platforms reveals many quotes supposedly said by Marie Antoinette. But did she really say them? Where did these quotes come from? In this new post series, 'And Marie Antoinette Said...' we will be taking a closer look at some of the most famous quotes attributed to the queen  (yes, including "Let them eat cake!") to uncover their origins and hopefully their veracity.
 
"I was a queen, and you took away my crown; a wife, and you killed my husband; a mother, and you deprived me of my children. My blood alone remains: take it, but do not make me suffer long."

This popular quote is credited as having been said by Marie Antoinette at her trial. In addition to being frequently shared online, the quote was commonly included in 19th century history books and can be even bound in books published in the last hundred years. The short speech is usually placed after Marie Antoinette's death sentence is read or when she is asked if she has anything to say in her own defense before the jury begins their deliberations.

It is a moving, novel-worthy quote to be sure--something that evokes a hauntingly elegant image of the burdened former queen, slowly rising in her tattered mourning gown, addressing the Revolutionary Tribunal with all the grace and wit of a daughter of the Caesars.

But did she actually say it?  (Read more.)
Share

Economic Warfare 2.0

 From Tierney's Real News:

President Trump is now doing to Communist China what Reagan did to the Bolshevik Communists behind the Soviet Union: defeating them economically. President Trump is now rewarding the countries who came to the table to negotiate a new tariff deal - with a 90 day pause - while doubling down on Communist China - who retaliated. This is called carrot & stick. This is how you break Communist China, ECONOMICALLY, the same way Reagan broke the Soviet Union.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!

BESSENT: “What I am certain of is that what China is doing will affect their economy much more than it will ours."

Scott Bessent, President Trump’s Treasury Secretary, has been making the rounds giving interviews. So far, I’ve seen him on Tucker, All-in, NBC, CBS, CNN, CNBC, Kudlow, Axios and more. You name it, he’s talking to them and explaining Trump’s economic plan to revive America. (Read more.)

Share

The Rise and Fall of Urban Frump

 From First Things:

Fashion is a complicated dialectic. Designers don’t just dictate what people wear: They have to be sensitive to psychic or spiritual needs, even if what they ultimately present to us is a chemically pure version of how we’d like to think of ourselves, or what we’re afraid of. They are artists, which means their designs will have as little in common with our daily needs as a Matisse portrait has in common with the human face. Even so, in light of Hu’s assessment, I think we can say that Urban Frump is the external manifestation of a desire to take oneself off the market. To be left alone, to not be a commodified chooser. The 2021 fashion show foretold that the more we become like robots, the more our faces glow like screens, the more we suffer from digital lethargy, then the more we crave the opposite of the sleek, optimized digital world: frumpy, bumpy, and lumpy natural fibers.

I’m going to miss Urban Frump. I found it endearing, but I’m sorry to say that the industry has moved on, as of spring 2025, from Urban Frump to the LARPer (Live Action Role Playing) look. The latest shows feature huge billowing pants, shoulder pads, black on white, leather shoes, bizarre combinations of long and short, and flowing capes. Trinity and Neo are back. It’s time to get over the fact that you have been uploaded into the world of datafication. It’s time to express your inner emoji, and let your inner avatar come billowing forth. And if that seems daunting, don’t worry: The fashion designers will be there to help you. (Read more.)

Share

Wednesday, April 9, 2025

The Turbulent Life of Henrietta Maria of France, Queen of England

 From All About Royal Families:

Recently I read a splendid book My Queen, My Love: A Novel of Henrietta Maria written by Elena Maria Vidal about Henrietta Maria of France. Who was she? Who was this French princess who became Queen of England?  So, time to make up another Royal History post.

Henrietta Maria was born on 25 November 1609 in the Louvre Palace in Paris. Her parents were Henry IV of France and Marie de' Medici. She was thus a member of the House of Bourbon. Of course Henriette Maria had other siblings. Among them were King Louis XIII of France and Elisabeth, who became Queen of Spain. Henrietta Maria was trained, along with her sisters, in riding, dancing, and singing, and took part in court plays. (Read more.)

 

Thanks to Kathleen for her wonderful review. To quote:

Due to my interest for royal history, I was very keen to read My Queen, My Love: A Novel of Henrietta Maria written by Elena Maria Vidal. The book didn't let me down, it captivated me from the beginning to the end, although I knew how the story continued...The author wrote this book very well and she painted a perfect picture from the 17th. century. It was very nice to read. So without no doubt, I recommend this book to all royal history lovers. I hope to read more books written by Elena Maria Vidal. I'm very pleased to give a 5 star rating for this captivating novel. (Read more.)

 
My Queen, My Love is available HERE.


Share

A Terrifying Transhumanism Warning

From The Vigilant Fox:

Biotech entrepreneur Ben Lamm painted a bone-chilling picture of where humanity could be headed on episode #2301 of The Joe Rogan Experience. Gene editing was at the heart of the conversation—and according to Lamm, China isn’t just experimenting with it. They’ve already created genetically modified children. He pointed to a now-infamous case in 2018, when Chinese scientist He Jiankui announced that he had cloned human embryos and edited their genes using CRISPR to make them resistant to HIV. The news shocked the world and led to widespread condemnation. He was later sentenced to prison for violating scientific ethics and conducting unapproved procedures. (Read more.)

Share

The Lancaster Sisters

 From History...the Interesting Bits:

Philippa of Lancaster was born at Leicester on 31 March 1360. She was the eldest daughter of John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster and 4th son of Edward III, and his first wife Blanche of Lancaster, great-great-granddaughter of Henry III. Philippa’s father was one of the richest men in the country – and one of the most powerful. Her life as a child would have been one of luxury and privilege, with a glorious dynastic marriage awaiting her in the future. Philippa was raised alongside her younger sister, Elizabeth, who was born in 1363/4, and her baby brother, Henry of Bolingbroke, born in 1367.

The children lost their mother when Blanche died at Tutbury on 12 September 1368, from the complications following the birth a daughter, Isabella, who did not survive. The children’s father was with Blanche when she died but departed on campaign to France soon after; although it is doubtful the children’s care was interrupted.

Philippa and her sister were raised together in one household, with Blanche Swynford, the daughter of their mother’s lady-in-waiting, Katherine Swynford. John of Gaunt provided his daughters with an annual allowance of £200. The Lancaster household was well-organised and run by Katherine, now the girls’ governess. She became mistress to their father, John of Gaunt, in early 1371. Despite his relationship with Katherine, in September 1371 the Lancaster children gained a stepmother in their father’s new bride, Constance of Castile. Constance was the daughter and heir of Pedro the Cruel, the deceased King of Castile who had been murdered by his half-brother, Henry of Trastámara, in March 1369. A new sister arrived when Constance gave birth to Catherine (Catalina) of Lancaster, in 1372/3.

Despite several dynastic marriage propositions, by 1385 and at 25 years old Philippa was still unmarried. However, in the following year her father took all three of his daughters on his military expedition to Spain, hoping to claim the kingdom of Castile in right of his second wife, Constance. Philippa’s marriage to John – or Joao – I of Portugal was agreed as part of an alliance made with her father at Ponte do Mouro in November 1386. Philippa was married to King John at Oporto on 2nd February 1387, before they had even received the required papal dispensation. Philippa was 26 – about 10 years older than the average age for a princess to marry. John of Portugal was three years her senior and had been king for just short of two years. (Read more.)

Share

Tuesday, April 8, 2025

Of Nunneries and Fair Rosamund


My sympathies have always been with Queen Eleanor. From The Abbey of Misrule:

Rosamund was the high-born daughter of a Norman Lord from the Welsh marches. Not very much is actually known about her, which is why it is so easy to fill the gaps with stories. What we do know is that she became the mistress (or one of the mistresses: medieval kings were not especially faithful creatures) of Henry II. When their affair became public, in 1174, the Queen, Eleanor of Aquitaine, unsurprisingly soured on the King, and it is said that she swore revenge on both Rosamund and her husband. Soon enough, she had joined with the King’s sons in a public rebellion against him. It failed, and she was imprisoned for fifteen years.

All of which, of course, was great news for Rosamund - and, indeed, the King, who could now dedicate himself fully to his mistress. Henry had built her a palace at Woodstock, complete with a labyrinth, a well to bathe in (which can still be seen today) and a secret bower where she and the King would meet when the Queen’s back was turned. Now, there was no need to hide. The King and his lover could be out and proud.

Chroniclers of the time tended to paint Rosamund as a whore and a temptress, who had seduced the King away from the straight and narrow path - a standard treatment of women at the time. In fact, though, we know nothing much about her, or about her real relationship with the King. All we have today are a burgeoning mass of Romantic stories. Rosamund and Henry became, for a long while, an archetypal love story from the Age of Chivalry. (Read more.)

Share

Red Storm Rising

 From Amuse on X:

The calculus of war often hides behind the fog of peacetime wishful thinking. But when a regime faces the collapse of its internal order, the temptation to seek salvation through external aggression becomes not merely probable, but perilously rational. China’s present condition, as Kyle Bass argues, is precisely such a moment. A regime on the brink, with few options left but one: war. Specifically, a war to seize Taiwan.

At first glance, this might appear alarmist. After all, isn’t the People’s Republic of China deeply intertwined with global markets? Wouldn’t an invasion risk sanctions, conflict with the United States, and economic ruin? Possibly. But Bass and defense analyst Reuben F. Johnson compel us to ask the more urgent question: would not invading Taiwan present an even greater risk to the regime?

 Consider the facts: China’s banking system is effectively insolvent, propped up by bad debt and political pressure. Its real estate sector—formerly the engine of growth—has imploded, leaving unfinished towers and bankrupt developers as symbols of economic hubris. Youth unemployment is not just high, but incalculable; so massaged are official statistics that they have simply stopped reporting it. Worse still, the yuan teeters on the edge of devaluation, held aloft only by unsustainable intervention. When the peg goes, capital flight will follow—and so will any remaining illusion of stability. (Read more.)


Share