Tea at Trianon: Questions on Charlie's Murder

John Wilson Croker on Marie-Antoinette

"We have followed the history of Marie Antoinette with the greatest diligence and scrupulosity. We have lived in those times. We have talked with some of her friends and some of her enemies; we have read, certainly not all, but hundreds of the libels written against her; and we have, in short, examined her life with– if we may be allowed to say so of ourselves– something of the accuracy of contemporaries, the diligence of inquirers, and the impartiality of historians, all combined; and we feel it our duty to declare, in as a solemn a manner as literature admits of, our well-matured opinion that every reproach against the morals of the queen was a gross calumny– that she was, as we have said, one of the purest of human beings."

~from History of the Guillotine by John Wilson Croker, 1844

Edmund Burke on Marie-Antoinette

"It is now sixteen or seventeen years since I saw the queen of France, then dauphiness, at Versailles; and surely there never lighted on this orb, which she hardly seemed to touch, a more delightful vision. I saw her just above the horizon, decorating and cheering the elevated sphere she had just begun to move in, glittering like a morning star full of life and splendor and joy. Oh, what a revolution....Little did I dream that I should have lived to see such disasters fall upon her, in a nation of gallant men, in a nation of men of honor and of cavaliers! I thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from their scabbards, to avenge even a look which threatened her with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone; that of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded...."

~Edmund Burke, October 1790

Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Questions on Charlie's Murder

From Tierney's Real News:

This is Part 3 of my report on Charlie’s murder. You can find Part 1 here and Part 2 here....
Kash: “Let me take a step back and tell you what we were doing while we were there and how we were led to the suspect. So that this all fits into the puzzle. We, as soon as we learned of the shooting, we were able to, Charlie was shot at 12:23pm local time on September 10th and by 12:39pm local time, local FBI assets were on scene securing the scene.
We launched at 10:00 am, the next day, September 11th, the first [still] images of the suspect. Myself and the deputy arrived at 5:00 pm local time on September 11th.
We decided to have a press conference at 8:00 pm on September 11th where we issued for the first time the FBI-obtained video footage that we received from the surveillance system and new images, enhanced images, that I decided to release immediately to the public because we were working with the public and the media to find this killer.
Shortly after that 8:00 pm release, two hours later, at 10:00 pm local time, the suspect was in custody. Why?
Because the father informed us pursuant to an interview of him that he looked at the video that we released that evening and the enhanced photos and identified the suspect.
That's how fast the FBI was working to put out information in real time. For comparative sake, the Boston Bombing, the FBI didn't release images for three days. We knew we didn't have three days. I made executive decision [when I took over] operational lead it turned out to be the right move. The men and women of the FBI said that's what we should be doing.” (Read more.)

The official documents. Also from Tierney's Real News:

Here are the ONLY official documents released in the Charlie Kirk case. Please read these documents BEFORE you listen to sound bites or read misleading headlines from the fake news. Please study these official documents for comparison later to media reports, witness statements and testimony...(Read more.)

From The Reactionary:

For starters, Robinson isn’t cooperating with authorities. The cooperation is apparently coming from Robinson’s transgender boyfriend/partner: Lance Twiggs (he also goes by Luna). Twiggs was allegedly raised in a Christian home but rejected the faith and his family, chose radical gender ideology (leftism), and had an account on a sexual anime furry website. And of course, he was a Biden supporter. He “developed a hatred of Christians and conservatives”, becoming “progressively worse the last year or two” and having issues with anger.
And according to reporting from Wisconsin Right Now, who spoke with a member of Twiggs’ family, he was in the process of transitioning and was taking different medications to further that goal. He was “very angry with anyone who is supportive of conservative ideals and Christian values.” He “is full of evil and hatred.”
By all accounts, the political values of Robinson and Twiggs were aligned. They were liberal, had hatred for those who were against radical transgender ideology, and certainly had intense hatred for Charlie Kirk and what he stood for. (Read more.)

Also from The Reactionary:

Today, prosecutors released the charging information against Tyler Robinson. He faces multiple counts, including aggravated murder (which we will summarize further below).
However, before we get to the charges, prosecutors also included texts exchanges between Robinson and his boyfriend, Lance Twiggs. These messages took place on September 10, not long the shooting. Why did Robinson do it? Here’s what he said:
I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again, hopefully they have moved on. I haven’t seen anything about them finding it.
The text exchange between Robinson and Twiggs started with Robinson’s message: “drop what you are doing, look under my keyboard.” Twiggs complied and found a note that said: “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I’m going to take it.” (Read more.)

From Culturcidal:

We also can’t forget the way these situations normally go.
If a conservative does something wrong (and we are far from perfect), it often gets exaggerated, distorted, and we get viciously slammed as a group, often for things we really didn't even say, do, or think. On the other hand, when liberals do something wrong, like say murdering a prominent conservative and publicly cheerleading it in the most disgusting and abrasive way possible, we get a lecture about how both sides made some mistakes and are equally at fault. Then we’re supposed to stop talking about the subject because it makes liberals look bad.
You know, “Let’s turn down the temperature. Let’s have unity. Let’s agree that we all made some mistakes.”
No.
We’re not talking about a few people on the fringes here. Millions of liberals are acting like they’re possessed by demons. Not only are they endorsing murder, they’re celebrating someone being murdered for having mainstream conservative views that are probably held by more than 100 million people. There are already more than 60,000 liberals catalogued who’ve stupidly been willing to call for murder or celebrate Charlie Kirk’s death online, so the real number is undoubtedly at least several million...(Read more.)