skip to main |
skip to sidebar
From
The American Thinker:
The Democratic Party's Leninist fundamental transformation is near complete. It was November 6 and 7, 1917 when Lenin and his Russian Bolsheviks led a coup d'état against the Duma's provisional government. The parallels between the Bolshevik takeover, which begat the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and the über-leftward turn of the Democratic Party are impossible to ignore. Lenin and the Bolsheviks did not significantly differ ideologically from the Romanov monarchical dynasty they ended with their takeover, or from the Mensheviks, from whom the Bolsheviks spilt in 1903, just as the new Democrats don't differ much from the old Democrats.
In the lead-up to Lenin's hijacking, the various Russian factions all sold iterations of socialism, democratic socialism, and communism. These -isms, at their core, are mostly the same. Lenin sold a revolutionary narrative of a proletariat revolt, in which the political power rests with the peasants and workers, which would evolve into socialism — equal social ownership of all produced by the workers.
Like any collectivist promise, it was all a colossal lie. What Lenin intentionally established was the Communist Party dictatorship, which lasted seven decades. It is, in principle, the same lie propagated by America's Democratic Party and its "democratic socialists." Socialists don't actually believe in the socialism they peddle, just as the Rolls-Royce-owning Lenin didn't believe in the Leninism he peddled. They believe that only everyone else should live under their oppression.
Every post–Industrial Revolution "revolution" is only about unfettered power and is always heavily influenced by Karl Marx, whom Lenin was an acolyte of. There is no war more importantly waged by the "revolutionaries" than a class war — the basis of Marxism. The opiate sold to the masses is that resources and capital are finite, hence the zeal against "capital"-ism, designed to make the masses junkies of the most addictive drug in man's history: government dependency.
The "new" Democrats — U.S. Representatives Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) — attack at will the "old" Democrats. Omar was perfectly comfortable comparing President Trump with President Obama, calling the former president a "pretty face" whose "hope and change" shtick was utter balderdash.
Tlaib admonished her Democratic Party for the same alleged Islamophobia rampant in the GOP. She also recently fantasized about her enemies floating dead in a river, as she proudly proclaimed that "the Muslims are coming," which is weird, because the Muslims have been here since our Founding. Recall Ocasio-Cortez's "New party, who dis?" dis against former Connecticut senator Joe Lieberman, who has rendered himself obsolete due to his calls for some ideological balance. Note the wording: "new party." (Read more.)
Share
No comments:
Post a Comment