Tea at Trianon: Was Oswald a CIA Agent?

John Wilson Croker on Marie-Antoinette

"We have followed the history of Marie Antoinette with the greatest diligence and scrupulosity. We have lived in those times. We have talked with some of her friends and some of her enemies; we have read, certainly not all, but hundreds of the libels written against her; and we have, in short, examined her life with– if we may be allowed to say so of ourselves– something of the accuracy of contemporaries, the diligence of inquirers, and the impartiality of historians, all combined; and we feel it our duty to declare, in as a solemn a manner as literature admits of, our well-matured opinion that every reproach against the morals of the queen was a gross calumny– that she was, as we have said, one of the purest of human beings."

~from History of the Guillotine by John Wilson Croker, 1844

Edmund Burke on Marie-Antoinette

"It is now sixteen or seventeen years since I saw the queen of France, then dauphiness, at Versailles; and surely there never lighted on this orb, which she hardly seemed to touch, a more delightful vision. I saw her just above the horizon, decorating and cheering the elevated sphere she had just begun to move in, glittering like a morning star full of life and splendor and joy. Oh, what a revolution....Little did I dream that I should have lived to see such disasters fall upon her, in a nation of gallant men, in a nation of men of honor and of cavaliers! I thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from their scabbards, to avenge even a look which threatened her with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone; that of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded...."

~Edmund Burke, October 1790

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Was Oswald a CIA Agent?

More facts are brought to light. Share

3 comments:

tubbs said...: One leaves oneself wide open to being called a conspiracy kook if one dares question the Warren report. Well, I became a "kook" appropoximately ten years ago, after reading the obit for the ER surgeon from the Dallas hospital where JFK was declared dead. The obit told of his life-long defiance of the Warren report, This doctor saw gunshot wounds to the head on a regular basis, and he boldly and consistantly stated that JFK was shot from the front.
Any one who's had a bit of shooting experience with guns and rifles (ex., hunters) knows what I mean.; October 29, 2009 at 2:06:00 PM EDT
elena maria vidal said...: Actually, almost 30 years ago at my liberal arts alma mater we had a thorough presentation from a scholar who was far from being a conspiracy kook. He showed us the tape of the assassination and talked about the forensics, especially the direction of the bullets, etc. It put some questions in my mind.; October 29, 2009 at 2:38:00 PM EDT
Julygirl said...: Without getting involved in the conspiracy theory thing, the fact that the back of Kennedy's head was blown off sounds like an exit wound to me, although he was definitely also shot from behind, which was the shot that also struck Gov. Connelly. But back to Oswald being in the CIA, in my opinion he was too much of a whiny attention seeking wimp to be in the CIA. I cannot imagine how he managed to make it through the Marine training program. I have watched the film clips over and over of his transfers back and forth within the police station in Dallas before the fateful outdoor transfer attempt, and all he does is whine and complain.; October 29, 2009 at 3:07:00 PM EDT