From
The National Review:
For a few criminals, remorse comes with old age; but for the
Clintons, near-70 was to be the capstone, the last chance to trump all
their prior shenanigans. They were artists of amorality, and the
election of 2016 was to be their magnum opus.
Collate the FBI reopened investigation, WikiLeaks Podesta trove,
revelations about the Clinton Foundation, the e-mail–server scandal, the
DNC disclosures, and the various off-the-cuff campaign remarks of Bill
and Hillary Clinton, and one then ponders what was the point of the
Clinton shakedowns, the loss of reputation, the crude lawbreaking, as
they neared their seventh decade. To paraphrase Barack Obama, in his
progressive sermonizing on making enough money, did the two ever think
they had enough money, enough honors, enough power already?
The Hillary/Bill fortune — generated by pay-for-play influence peddling
on the proposition that Bill would return to the White House under
Hillary’s aegis and reward friends while punishing enemies — hit a
reported $150 million some time ago, a fortune built not on farming,
mining, insurance, finance, high-tech, or manufacturing, but on skimming
off money. The Clintons are simply grifters whose insider access to
government gave them the power to make rich people richer.
Long gone was the Scrooge-like need to write off used underwear as
charitable tax deductions or to play 4-trillion-to-one odds in rigging a
$100,000 cattle-futures profit on a $1,000 “investment,” or Hillary’s
decade-and-a-half as a corporate lawyer masquerading as a children’s
advocate. How pathetic the minor league Whitewater cons must seem now to
the multimillionaire Clintons — such a tawdry ancient example of
amateurish shakedowns when compared with the sophistication of real
profiteering through the humanitarian-sounding, high-brow, corrupt
Clinton Foundation.
So the Clintons finally got their millions and what such millions can
ensure for their separate lifestyles. They have at last beautiful gated
estates, tasteful and secluded from hoi polloi, light years away from
Arkansas and the Rose Law Firm. Progressive Chelsea married a
multimillionaire hedge-fund operator whose father served five years in
federal prison for bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud. Her parents’
profiteering can allow Chelsea to announce, perhaps even sincerely, that
she is not interested in money. Why should she be, given her own
reported $15 million net worth from maternal spin-off favors? She lives
in a $10 million Manhattan residence, so her parents had no motivation
to get more in order to “provide” for their offspring. Instead, was
bringing Chelsea down to Bill and Hillary’s level as a Foundation fixer a
way to leave her a post mortem primer on how to get even richer? (
Read more.)
Share
1 comment:
Rudy Guiliani said when he was States Attorney he indicted people on less evidence, and if they had an Italian last name they would never have gotten away with their racketeering and money laundering schemes.
Post a Comment