Any "literacy" programs were part of Communist re-education. From
Intellectual Takeout:
On CBS’ 60 Minutes, Senator Bernie Sanders recently praised the achievements of
communist Cuba. An interviewer asked him about his 1985 comments that
Cubans supported communist dictator Fidel Castro because he “educated
their kids, gave their kids health care, totally transformed society.”
In response, Sanders defended those comments, by stating that when
“Fidel Castro came into office, you know what he did? He had a massive
literacy program.”
But Castro did not give Cubans literacy. Cuba already had one of the highest highest
literacy rates in Latin America by 1950, nearly a decade before Castro
took power, according to United Nations data (statistics from UNESCO).
In 2016, The Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler debunked a politician’s claim that Castro’s rule significantly improved Cuban healthcare and education. In today’s Cuba, children are taught by poorly paid teachers in dilapidated schools. Cuba has made less educational progress than most Latin American countries over the last 60 years.
According
to UNESCO, Cuba had about the same literacy rate as Costa Rica and
Chile in 1950 (close to 80 percent). And it has almost the same literacy
rate as they do today (close to 100 percent). Meanwhile,
Latin American countries that were largely illiterate in 1950—such as
Peru, Brazil, El Salvador, and the Dominican Republic—are largely
literate today, closing much of the gap with Cuba. El Salvador had a
less than 40 percent literacy rate in 1950, but has an 88 percent
literacy rate today. Brazil and Peru had a less than 50 percent literacy
rate in 1950, but today, Peru has a 94.5 percent literacy rate, and
Brazil a 92.6 percent literacy rate. The Dominican Republic’s rate rose
from a little over 40 percent to 91.8 percent. While Cuba made
substantial progress in reducing illiteracy in Castro’s first years in
power, its educational system has stagnated since, even as much of Latin
America improved.
Contrary to Sanders’ claim that Castro “gave”
Cubans healthcare, they already had access to healthcare before he
seized power. Doctors frequently
provided free healthcare to those who couldn’t afford it. As
The Washington Post’s
Glenn Kessler noted,
“As for health care and education, Cuba was already near the top of the
heap before the revolution. Cuba’s low infant mortality rate is often
lauded, but it already led the region on this key measure in 1953-1958,
according to data collected by Carmelo Mesa-Lago, a Cuba specialist and
professor emeritus at the University of Pittsburgh.”
Cuba led virtually all countries
in Latin America in life expectancy in 1959, before Castro’s communists
seized power. But by 2012, right after Castro stepped down as Communist
Party leader, Chileans and Costa Ricans lived slightly longer than
Cubans.
Back in 1960, Chileans had a life span seven years shorter than
Cubans, and Costa Ricans lived more than two years less than Cubans on
average. In 1960, Mexicans lived seven years shorter than Cubans; by
2012, the gap had shrunk to just two years. (Today, life spans are virtually the same in
Cuba as more prosperous Chile and Costa Rica — if you accept the rosy
official statistics put out by Cuba’s communist government, which many
people do not. Cuba has been credibly accused of hiding infant deaths, and exaggerating the life spans of its citizens. If these accusations are true, Cubans die sooner than Chileans or Costa Ricans).
Cuba has made less progress in health care and
life expectancy than most of Latin America in recent years, due to its
decrepit health care system. “Hospitals in the island’s capital are
literally falling apart.” Sometimes,
patients "have to bring everything with them, because the hospital provides nothing. Pillows, sheets, medicine: everything.”
(Read more.)
Share
No comments:
Post a Comment