skip to main |
skip to sidebar
From
Crisis:
In January, co-owner Aaron Klein had denied a request to bake a cake
for a lesbian wedding. “The Bible tells us to flee from sin,” his wife
and business namesake, Melissa Klein told a Fox News columnist recently.
“I don’t think making a cake for it helps. Protests, boycotts, and a
storm of media attention—much of it negative—ensued. The couple received
death threats. Then, activists broadened the boycott: any wedding
vendor that did business with Sweet Cakes would be targeted.
The final nail in the coffin came in August when the slighted lesbian
couple filed an anti-discrimination suit with the state. “The LGBT
attacks are the reason we are shutting down the shop. They have killed
our business through mob tactics,” Klein said. His wife added: “I guess in my mind I thought we lived in a lot nicer of a world where everybody tolerated everybody.”
Christian Wedding Vendors Under Attack
In 2006, a noted advocate for traditional marriage, Maggie Gallagher,
warned that the legalization of same-sex marriage would lead to
constraints on religious freedom. Writing in the Weekly Standard,
Gallagher saw the end of adoptions services by Boston Catholic
Charities as a foreshadowing of things to come. (To retain its license,
Gallagher explained, the agency would have to abide by the state’s
anti-discrimination law, which had been extended to married same-sex
couples.) She couched her warning in the form of a question:
This March, then, unexpectedly, a mere two years after
the introduction of gay marriage in America, a number of latent concerns
about the impact of this innovation on religious freedom ceased to be
theoretical. How could Adam and Steve’s marriage possibly hurt anyone
else? When religious-right leaders prophesy negative consequences from
gay marriage, they are often seen as overwrought. The First Amendment,
we are told, will protect religious groups from persecution for their
views about marriage. So who is right? Is the fate of Catholic Charities
of Boston an aberration or a sign of things to come?
Seven years later, we have the answer: as of this writing, there have
been at least 11 instances of wedding vendors and venues facing some
form of recrimination—threats, boycotts, protests, and the intervention
of state or judicial authorities—because they denied services for gay
nuptials because of their faith. (Read more.)
Share
4 comments:
Though I am a strong supporter of gay marriage I feel why would any gay couple take their business to a baker,caterer, etc. that is opposed to gay marriage? We are all allowed to serve whom we wish. The gay couples should give their money and business to outfits that support them. Period. There will always be homophobia; that will never change. Our gay brothers and sisters should patronize the firms that support them; easy decision.
Yes, I would think they would want to support businesses run by those who share their beliefs and inclinations. Unfortunately, many of these lawsuits are started to cause trouble.
Not that it's entirely on-point, but it is far too easy to bring lawsuits today and too many people spring to it as the go-to position.
They do, and that is one reason insurance costs are so high.
Post a Comment