A place for friends to meet... with reflections on politics, history, art, music, books, morals, manners, and matters of faith.
A blog by Elena Maria Vidal.
"She was not a guilty woman, neither was she a saint; she was an upright, charming woman, a little frivolous, somewhat impulsive, but always pure; she was a queen, at times ardent in her fancies for her favourites and thoughtless in her policy, but proud and full of energy; a thorough woman in her winsome ways and tenderness of heart, until she became a martyr."
"We have followed the history of Marie Antoinette with the greatest diligence and scrupulosity. We have lived in those times. We have talked with some of her friends and some of her enemies; we have read, certainly not all, but hundreds of the libels written against her; and we have, in short, examined her life with– if we may be allowed to say so of ourselves– something of the accuracy of contemporaries, the diligence of inquirers, and the impartiality of historians, all combined; and we feel it our duty to declare, in as a solemn a manner as literature admits of, our well-matured opinion that every reproach against the morals of the queen was a gross calumny– that she was, as we have said, one of the purest of human beings."
"It is now sixteen or seventeen years since I saw the queen of France, then dauphiness, at Versailles; and surely there never lighted on this orb, which she hardly seemed to touch, a more delightful vision. I saw her just above the horizon, decorating and cheering the elevated sphere she had just begun to move in, glittering like a morning star full of life and splendor and joy. Oh, what a revolution....Little did I dream that I should have lived to see such disasters fall upon her, in a nation of gallant men, in a nation of men of honor and of cavaliers! I thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from their scabbards, to avenge even a look which threatened her with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone; that of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded...."
~Edmund Burke, October 1790
A Note on Reviews
Unless otherwise noted, any books I review on this blog I have either purchased or borrowed from the library, and I do not receive any compensation (monetary or in-kind) for the reviews.
The claim that Admiral Zheng He (a Muslim eunuch) "discovered" America has caused quite a bit of controversy. So far, most scholars completely discount the idea. However, I would say it is remotely possible but what I most dispute is that, if true, it should in some way displace Columbus. We already know that the Vikings came to America long before either voyage, the ancestors of the Native Americans came from Asia long before that and even if Zheng He did reach America first it was still the voyage of Columbus that sparked the European colonization of America and changed the course of history.
Vikings discovered Iceland then later Greenland (Erik the Red) then Vinland (Wineland, his son Leif Eriksson), and it is believed the latter area is Labrador Bay or something. And that was before 1418, the year of that Chinese General.
Thanks for the additional information and feedback. Of course, St. Brendan the Navigator probably found North America before the lot of them! However, the discovery by Columbus is in a category by itself, since his explorations opened up the New World to vast colonization, which the other discoveries did not.
Sure it was America St Brendan found? Seems to have been islands that were rather, as some places in The Quest of the Holy Grail, spiritual places. Places, that like Eden cannot be found again. Which neither precludes, but nor indeed implies America.
As for America, what think ye of Thor Heyerdahl's theory that bearded and red haired people (presumably Phenicians) from Heliopolis came to 1 Central America, 2 lake Titicaca, 3 Easter Island?
Phenician looking people were arguably a minority anywhere in the New World, but they were there.
Thor Heyerdahl first traced possible artisanal influences on style between S America and Polynesia by the Kon Tiki expedition (getting in a raft from Peru to Polynesia).
Then he traced the Phenician looking people on Easter Island (long ears/orejones because they used to extend their ear nibs like some African peoples do) in the Aku Aku expedition (interviews, diggings, participation in pagan rites - Th H was an apostate since youth or childhood - reconstruction of long ear knowhow of making an "aku aku") and he noted their similarity with a people formerly known in Titicaca area.
Then he tried to prove, in parallel of reaching Polynesia in a Peruvian raft, that people could have got to S America in Egyptian reed boats. Ra I failed, Ra II followed.
Marie-Antoinette "en gaulle" by Elisabeth Vigée-Lebrun
#1 in Kindle Biographies of Royalty!
Marie-Antoinette, Daughter of the Caesars: Her Life, Her Times, Her Legacy
An Audible Bestseller
Marie-Antoinette, Daughter of the Caesars: Her Life, Her Times, Her Legacy
An Amazon Bestseller
Trianon: A Novel of Royal France
My Queen, My Love: A Novel of Henrietta Maria
Available from Amazon
The Saga of Marie-Antoinette's daughter, Marie-Thérèse of France
A Novel of the Restoration
In Kirkus Top 20 for 2014! And #1 in Kindle Historical Mystery, Thriller & Suspense Fiction
"In every Eden, there dwells a serpent . . . ."
#1 in Kindle History of France!
The Night's Dark Shade: A Novel of the Cathars
Listen to Tea at Trianon Radio
All about Marie-Antoinette!
Join me on Facebook!
Elena Maria Vidal Author Page
Join me on X!
@emvidal
Visit My Tumblr!
East of the Sun, West of the Moon
St. Teresa of Avila, pray for us!
"...Bud forth as the rose planted by the brooks of waters. Give ye a sweet odor as frankincense. Send forth flowers, as the lily...and bring forth leaves in grace, and praise with canticles, and bless the Lord in his works." —Ecclesiasticus 39:17-19
The fact that a link is provided here in no way constitutes an endorsement of everything on the other end of the link.
Comments Policy
Comments are moderated. If a comment is not published, it may be due to a technical error. At any rate, do not take offense; it is nothing personal. Slanderous comments will not be published. Anonymity may be tolerated, but politeness is required.
I would like to respond to every comment but my schedule renders it impossible to do so. Please know that I appreciate those who take the time to share their thoughts.
7 comments:
The claim that Admiral Zheng He (a Muslim eunuch) "discovered" America has caused quite a bit of controversy. So far, most scholars completely discount the idea. However, I would say it is remotely possible but what I most dispute is that, if true, it should in some way displace Columbus. We already know that the Vikings came to America long before either voyage, the ancestors of the Native Americans came from Asia long before that and even if Zheng He did reach America first it was still the voyage of Columbus that sparked the European colonization of America and changed the course of history.
Vikings discovered Iceland then later Greenland (Erik the Red) then Vinland (Wineland, his son Leif Eriksson), and it is believed the latter area is Labrador Bay or something. And that was before 1418, the year of that Chinese General.
Thanks for the additional information and feedback. Of course, St. Brendan the Navigator probably found North America before the lot of them! However, the discovery by Columbus is in a category by itself, since his explorations opened up the New World to vast colonization, which the other discoveries did not.
Sure it was America St Brendan found? Seems to have been islands that were rather, as some places in The Quest of the Holy Grail, spiritual places. Places, that like Eden cannot be found again. Which neither precludes, but nor indeed implies America.
As for America, what think ye of Thor Heyerdahl's theory that bearded and red haired people (presumably Phenicians) from Heliopolis came to 1 Central America, 2 lake Titicaca, 3 Easter Island?
Hans, have you ever read Tim Severin's book called The Brendan Voyage? It is very enlightening. I did a post on it a few years back.
http://teaattrianon.blogspot.com/2007/11/how-irish-discovered-america.html
I don't know enough about Heyerdahl's theory in order to comment on it but it sounds interesting.
Phenician looking people were arguably a minority anywhere in the New World, but they were there.
Thor Heyerdahl first traced possible artisanal influences on style between S America and Polynesia by the Kon Tiki expedition (getting in a raft from Peru to Polynesia).
Then he traced the Phenician looking people on Easter Island (long ears/orejones because they used to extend their ear nibs like some African peoples do) in the Aku Aku expedition (interviews, diggings, participation in pagan rites - Th H was an apostate since youth or childhood - reconstruction of long ear knowhow of making an "aku aku") and he noted their similarity with a people formerly known in Titicaca area.
Then he tried to prove, in parallel of reaching Polynesia in a Peruvian raft, that people could have got to S America in Egyptian reed boats. Ra I failed, Ra II followed.
That's fascinating! Thanks!
Post a Comment