From
Artsy:
In a 2012 exhibition about the birth of abstraction at the Museum of Modern Art
in New York, curators highlighted the way that the artists may have
influenced one another. Titled “Inventing Abstraction: 1910–1925,” the
show illustrated over 80 artists’ radical departures from the traditions
of representational art, and opened with a large diagram depicting
their network to show who knew each other (an interactive version of which is online), with the most connected, like Pablo Picasso and Wassily Kandinsky, toward the center.
While
working on the show with her colleagues, exhibition curator Leah
Dickerman (now MoMA’s director of editorial and content strategy) was
influenced in part by a course she had taken with Columbia Business
School professor and Chazen Senior Scholar Paul Ingram, which was about
how curators can use their professional networks to achieve success.
Ingram helped to develop an early iteration of the network of early
pioneers of abstraction, and later, he used the same data to embark on a
new investigation.
Ingram and his
colleague Mitali Banerjee, of HEC Paris, used MoMA’s findings to examine
the role that creativity and social networks played for these artists,
in relationship to the level of fame they achieved. In a 2018
paper,
they relayed their findings—including that for successful artists,
making friends may be more important than producing novel art. (
Read more.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Courteous comments are welcome. If a comment is not published, it may be due to a technical error. At any rate, do not take offense; it is nothing personal. Slanderous comments will not be published. Anonymity may be tolerated, but politeness is required.
I would like to respond to every comment but my schedule renders it impossible to do so. Please know that I appreciate those who take the time to share their thoughts.