A place for friends to meet... with reflections on politics, history, art, music, books, morals, manners, and matters of faith.
A blog by Elena Maria Vidal.
Writing historical fiction presents its own particular challenges,
not least when it comes to dialogue. How does an author create a sense
of time and place without sounding faux-archaic or having characters
proclaim “ye olde clichés”? Worse still, the unwitting author can
sometimes use words or phrases of sufficient modernity to rudely jerk
the reader out of their pleasant suspension of disbelief. I have done
that myself, which is why this has become a topic close to my own heart.
The thing that brings it into sharpest focus is swearing.
Swearing is an extremely useful item for any writer to have in their
toolbox. The technical term for swearing is ‘using intensifiers’, and
indeed that is exactly what it does. A carefully used, well-placed curse
can give a character’s emotion more impact on the reader than a whole
paragraph of description. It portrays that character’s mood or mental
state in the most immediate manner. If you get it wrong, however, it can
sound gratuitous, silly, or just plain anachronistic.
Most serious historical fiction authors will go to great lengths to
try to be authentic to the events and culture of the time period they
are writing in. Unfortunately, when it comes to cursing, a problem
arises where what once sounded shocking to our ancestors now seems
banal, childish or worse, laughable. In contrast, the everyday language
used in the past can now be deemed unacceptable.
Using authentic curses can just seem plain odd to a modern reader. In
sixth form, I had to read Sheridan’s School for Scandal and recall the
hilarity with which we snotty-nosed 1980s kids regarded each utterance
of Egad or Sdeath, 18th Century expletives which would
have then been regarded as outrageous. The text’s original readers
found the “D” word so terrible it could only be printed as D___ (I am
talking about “Damn” by the way, in case you were thinking of another D
word). Shakespeare’s use of curses like Swounds or Sblood met similar chortling.
In his Holcroft Blood series,
set in the 17th Century, Angus Donald is careful to scatter enough
original slang through his dialogue to give a sense of the era without
overwhelming the reader with obscure or (to modern eyes) laughable
expletives. Despite the name of the main character, Donald avoids using
too much authentic swearing like Sblood. This once-shocking
curse is a contraction of “By God’s Blood”, which gives us a clue to the
origins of swearing. In the past, people first swore by their gods.
They made oaths, promises to achieve deeds that they asked their Deities
to witness and approve or aid them in their endeavors to fulfill them.
It was the solemnity of the religious element that originally brought
censure to swearing. These were words that should only be said in the
most serious of circumstances. (Read more.)
Courteous comments are welcome. If a comment is not published, it may be due to a technical error. At any rate, do not take offense; it is nothing personal. Slanderous comments will not be published. Anonymity may be tolerated, but politeness is required.
I would like to respond to every comment but my schedule renders it impossible to do so. Please know that I appreciate those who take the time to share their thoughts.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Courteous comments are welcome. If a comment is not published, it may be due to a technical error. At any rate, do not take offense; it is nothing personal. Slanderous comments will not be published. Anonymity may be tolerated, but politeness is required.
I would like to respond to every comment but my schedule renders it impossible to do so. Please know that I appreciate those who take the time to share their thoughts.