A place for friends to meet... with reflections on politics, history, art, music, books, morals, manners, and matters of faith. A blog by Elena Maria Vidal.
Pages
▼
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
Queen Charlotte in 1769
From Tiny-Librarian. I have the greatest respect and admiration for Charlotte, Queen of England but I do not understand why she is not remembered for luxurious clothes while Marie-Antoinette is, especially when Charlotte's clothes were more lavish than Antoinette's. Even Antoinette's grandest gowns had an air of simplicity.
2 comments:
Courteous comments are welcome. If a comment is not published, it may be due to a technical error. At any rate, do not take offense; it is nothing personal. Slanderous comments will not be published. Anonymity may be tolerated, but politeness is required.
I would like to respond to every comment but my schedule renders it impossible to do so. Please know that I appreciate those who take the time to share their thoughts.
M.A. was more 'out there' for everyone to see, criticize and pass judgement upon, plus as you have pointed out, had enemies who wanted the Monarchs out of the way...
ReplyDeleteCaroline just did not have as much going for her in the way of looks and personality as Antoinette did, being notably plain. A beautiful young woman is always going to get a lot more attention than a plain-faced woman well into middle age. And, even though her clothes were luxurious and extravagant, she did not have the sense of style that Marie did. Antoinette was a real style leader and did things with clothes that no one else had done, while Caroline was more conventional.
ReplyDelete