The pill. Freedom in a tablet. The
cause célèbre of the women's rights movement. Particularly in the wake of the Supreme Court's
Hobby Lobby decision in 2014 and the uncertain future of the
Affordable Care Act,
no other issue, perhaps barring campus sexual assault, has dominated
the contemporary feminist agenda as much as birth control.
Despite this focus, the history of this relative freedom is
something about which many advocates seem ignorant. More women (27.5%,
according to recent
data
from the Guttmacher Institute) rely on the pill than any other type of
contraception, yet public discourse suggests that most, on the pill or
not, have no idea about its past anchored in eugenics, sexism and
racism.
The irony of the pill is that it was
tested on women, specifically
women of color — many of whom were forced to undergo
sterilization — before later being marketed predominately to white women in America as a symbol of independence.
"The pill has functioned as a technique not only for
controlling reproduction but also for producing and controlling gender
and race," scholar Beatriz Preciado writes in her book about gender in
the age of pharmacology,
Testo Junkie. Indeed, Dr. Gregory Pincus and Dr. John Rock — two of Eig's "crusaders," funded by Planned Parenthood founder
Margaret Sanger — effectively sterilized hundreds of women, from non-consenting
psychiatric patients at the Worcester State Hospital to destitute Puerto Rican women living in the housing projects of
Rio Piedras, by testing variations of the pill on them.
"Guinea pigs": There were a handful of reasons why
Puerto Rico became "the ideal setting for pill trials, which were the
largest series of clinical tests ever performed," Preciado writes. As
PBS reports, government "officials supported birth control as a form of
population control in the hopes that it would stem Puerto Rico's endemic
poverty." In 1937, the passage of
Law 136 legally sanctioned sterilization of Puerto Rican women for
such purposes.
What's more, the pill trials that later began in Puerto Rico in the
1950s also expanded to other "pseudo-colonial locations" like Haiti and
Mexico, Iris Ofelia López
points out in her book
Matters of Choice: Puerto Rican Women's Struggle for Reproductive Freedom.
The real kicker? Women of color continued to be used as "
guinea pigs"
because the FDA, Preciado writes, "felt it threw doubt on the
femininity of American women by suppressing their periods altogether."
As a result "one-third of ever-married women aged 20-49 had
been sterilized" in Puerto Rico by 1965, with "two-fifths of them before
the age of 25," according to an article by sociology professor Harriet B. Presser. (Read more.)