Sunday, April 1, 2007

Denial of the Soul

Columba has a thought-provoking article based on the research of scholar Stanley Elkins about how the treatment of slaves was more humane in the Spanish dominated parts of the Americas than in the United States, where it was often denied they had a soul. In Catholic regions, at least, it was accepted that the enslaved needed to receive the Sacraments just like everyone else, the sacramental life forming the basis of civil rights.

....From this it followed, that legally the slavemaster [in Spanish dominated areas] never had the total control over the slave's body that characterized slavery in North America. A master could legally beat a slave, but not to the point of drawing blood or inflicting contusions. If a slave was accused of crimes, he was tried in the same court that any free man would be tried in. Slaves had legal holidays and legally mandated time off. Slaves could buy their freedom, by contracting their labor out to another person. The master was legally forced to set a sales price. These laws were generally enforced, except in Brazil where enforcement was weak.

As for the church, while it did acknowledge slavery and accommodate to it, it nonetheless also consistently warned that the slaveholder was in danger of mortal sin. Hence, the church was active in encouraging slave manumission, which was permitted throughout the system. The church never denied the injustice of slavery, and the 18th-century prelate Cardinal Gerdil stated categorically: "Slavery is not to be understood as conferring on one man the same power over another that men have over cattle...For slavery does not abolish the natural equality of man."


Thus, the church acted to encourage manumission to save the mortal soul of the slaveower and also acted to better the conditions of those in slavery. The church ministered to slaves. This means that slaves had to be baptized and to take the sacraments, including the sacrament of marriage. Slaves owned by different owners who wanted to marry were to be allowed to do so; families could not be separated. The church ministered to slaves and also priests functioned as inspectors of the system, reporting cases of abuse, etc. " As Elkins reports:


"A Caribbean synod of 1622, whose santiones had the force of law, made lengthy provisions for the chastisement of masters on feast days. Here the power of the Faith was such that master and slave stood equally humble before it. 'Every one who has slaves,' according to the first item in the Spanish code, 'is obliged to instruct them in the principles of the Roman Catholic religion and the necessary truths in order that the slaves may be baptized within the first year of their residence in the Spanish dominions.' Certain assumptions were implied therein which made it impossible that the slave in this culture should ever quite be considered as mere property, either in law or in society's customary habits of mind. These assumptions, prepetuated and fostered by the church, made all the difference in his treatment by society and its institutions, not only while a slave, but also if and when he should cease to be one.
They were [acknowledging], in effect, that he was a man, that he had a soul as precious as any other man's, that he had a moral nature, that he was not only as susceptible to sin, but also as eligible for grace as his master--that master and slave were brothers in Christ." [emphasis added] Share

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Any idea how these other churches justified their apparently denying that slaves had souls?

Anonymous said...

Before I make the comments I'm itching to make, I might ought to mention that I don't think any one religion is either all good or all bad, and would be saddened if anyone imputed such notions to me.

I also think it's fair, even an elementary matter of prudence, to look at the different beliefs, and fruits, of the different religions. By the fruits ye shall know them...

No other church of which I can think, all of which, incidentally, have married clergy, has nearly as many stories in the vein of those linked to below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_las_casas

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
/Jesuit_Reductions

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Claver

Surely something of which to be proud.